why else do you think the warnings from him for scientist to stay away from the bible?
Why does he want to hide from the truth?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
why else do you think the warnings from him for scientist to stay away from the bible?
Acts 17:21 (For all the Athenians and strangers which were there spent their time in nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new thing.)
I'll bet they sound like your kind of people, don't they?
Every time AVET has no answer to a post, he takes some random quote from scripture and posts it out of context. This represents his level of biblical learning that we are supposed to emulate.That would be a scientist's job today.
1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
We don't go snooping around the bible. You are the one snooping around the bible to find some way to misapply it to our understanding of nature and the physical world. If you stuck to the supernatural, you would get little grief from me.Well ooh and aah to science.
Good for them -- and I mean that.
But when they come snooping around the Bible with their clipboards, they should be taught the lesson that was taught to Uzzah,* viz. there are places you just don't go.
* Non-lethal, that is -- this is a new dispensation.![]()
Every time AVET has no answer to a post, he takes some random quote from scripture and posts it out of context. This represents his level of biblical learning that we are supposed to emulate.
Bologna.We don't go snooping around the bible.
Bologna.
Who was here first? creationists or evolutionists?
if they must be called so, evolutionists, creationism is a knee-jerk reaction to science.Bologna.
Who was here first? creationists or evolutionists?
Um ... no.if they must be called so, evolutionists, creationism is a knee-jerk reaction to science.
Um ... no.
Adam, who wrote Genesis 1 & 2, was a creationist.
Darwin came much later.
Bologna.
Who was here first? creationists or evolutionists?
Um ... no.
Adam, who wrote Genesis 1 & 2, was a creationist.
Darwin came much later.
Adam evolved from mud. So Adam was a theistic evolutionist.
I didn't say he did.lol Adam didn't write Genesis.
Um ... no.
Adam, who wrote Genesis 1 & 2, was a creationist.
lol Adam didn't write Genesis.
I didn't say he did.
Oh, now he meant: Adam didn't write Genesis 1 & 2?You are really making yourself look bad, AVET. Or are you really just confusing yourself?
Oh, now he meant: Adam didn't write Genesis 1 & 2?
And I move the goal posts?
Either that, or he knew better than to say, "Adam didn't write Genesis 1 & 2", knowing I'd come back to the contrary with Wikipedia.Please spare us your sophistry. Yes, he meant Genesis 1 & 2. Did you really think his point centered on the writing of the entire book, rather than just the first two chapters?
You can talk yourselves out of believing that if you want; but my point still stands: creationists where here long before evolutionist were.Adam wrote Genesis (1,2 or 2118) just as Bilbo Baggins wrote the Red Book of the Westmarch, which as we all know, was published by another famous englishman.