Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Gone? decayed? crumbled to dust? hidden somewhere? not hidden, but pending discovery? none of the above?Then where is the evidence of *that* in the Egyptian records?
Gone? decayed? crumbled to dust? hidden somewhere? not hidden, but pending discovery? none of the above?
Keep looking.
Would you even recognize the "real world" if you lived in it?It would show evidence from the real world.
Because it doesn't make it through my heuristics.Why do you reject evidence from reality?
LOL -- solid gold!Your new "go look for the things I need to prove you wrong" tactic is new, but it has already grown tiresome.
My suggestion Frumious, is that if you can't find physical evidence of something you want to find in the Bible --- keep looking.
Would you even recognize the "real world" if you lived in it?
What does the "real world" look like?
Does it contain a generation of Thalidomites? a ninth planet downgraded on paper? a plethora of astronauts whose missions were cut short? an unsinkable passenger vessel at the bottom of the ocean? oil washing ashore in the Gulf of Mexico? a lifesaving footbridge hauled off to the landfill?
Does a "real world" contain ...
Hebrews 13:2 Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.
I submit most don't know what all our "real world" contains.
Because it doesn't make it through my heuristics.
Why do you?
Why should they?But whatever it is, it won't contradict the things we DO know.
I reject reality if reality doesn't make it through my heuristics.So you reject reality if reality isn't the way you think it should be?
Why should they?
The things you DO know contradict themselves eventually.
Like when they "knew" Nebraska Man was a missing link -- until it wasn't.
Or like they "knew" Pluto was our ninth planet -- until it wasn't.
Or like they "knew" Thalidomide was a "prenatal wonder drug" -- until it wasn't.
Or like they "knew" the Challenger was GO FOR THROTTLE UP -- until it wasn't.
Or like they "knew" ...
LOL -- solid gold!
Run a FIND on my "new tactic" and read all 236 results!
Here's the oldest one -- note the date:
I declare academia's paper reality "wrong," if it doesn't meet my standards.So you declare reality to be wrong, huh?
I reject reality if reality doesn't make it through my heuristics.
Let's put it this way:So of course, you know better than the experts...
Let's put it this way:
I know when they're wrong.
Maybe you need to see my standards again then:That's not knowing. That's rejecting things just because you disagree with them.
Your new "go look for the things I need to prove you wrong" tactic is new, but it has already grown tiresome.
Now before we can check the Egyptian records we need to know the Pharaoh whom Moses demand of "Let my people go!"
Where should we start? Who was the pharaoh?
Yes .. the Bible a major source for causing many of the world's disagreements.Maybe you need to see my standards again then:
1. Bible says x, Science says x = go with x
2. Bible says x, Science says y = go with x
3. Bible says x, Science says ø = go with x
4. Bible says ø, Science says x = go with x
5. Bible says ø, Science says ø = free to speculate on your own
Prime Directive: Under no circumstances whatsoever is the Bible to be contradicted.
I reject things because the BIBLE rejects them.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?