Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If you two don't mind stepping out of the way and letting someone more qualified in answering questions the way they were written, I would sure appreciate it.It's reality, AV -- which, I grant you, has nothing whatsoever to do with this thread.
It's YEC, not Last Thursdayism.
If it was Last Thursdayism, you would have to admit that the rock is 10,000 years old.
And inasmuch as you guys would love to discuss YEC, Last Thursdayism, and I having things backwards -- could we stick to embedded age here, please?
If you two don't mind stepping out of the way and letting someone more qualified in answering questions the way they were written, I would sure appreciate it.
And Last Thursdayism isn't?Embedded age is, as we have shown, a nonsensical concept.
No.Heh, more qualified=agrees with you?
And Last Thursdayism isn't?
No.
More qualified = answering the questions the way they were written.
You're the one who asked how old the rock would be existentialy. It would be Xenu's rock. Case closed. (I can further clarify it for you if you want)What does 'you know who' have to do with this thread?
If a rock came into existence ex nihilo and radiodated as 10,000 years old:
1. Explain why that would not be an example of embedded age.
2. How old would the rock be:
- physically
- existentially
You, sir, are a breath of fresh air.I can't. That would be a perfect example of embedded age.
Its physical age would be different from its existential age though.The rock's age would equal the amount of time it has been in existence, period. That is the definition of "age."
That's actually a good question, but for another thread --Now, my question is, how would one know the true age of the rock?
You, sir, are a breath of fresh air.
Its physical age would be different from its existential age though.
That's actually a good question, but for another thread --
You, sir, are a breath of fresh air.
Its physical age would be different from its existential age though.
That's actually a good question, but for another thread --
The true age wouldn't matter; be it 9000 years, or 10,000 or 60 years.Aww, c'mon. I obliged you. Now, you indulge me.
The true age wouldn't matter; be it 9000 years, or 10,000 or 60 years.
Embedded age is embedded age.
Hooray -- someone finally validated your vanity.
And there you have the meaning of "embedded age": truth doesn't matter.
What do you mean?Hmph. You beat me too it, NP.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?