Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Do you remember these two posts?
Sorry, 46, I've already lost interest in this thread.Yes, and I asked you AFTER that how that is not fudging. I'll ask it again, how is picking whichever average fits (and discarding others) not inherently dishonest?
I plan to use it to QV people to, when I see them accusing God of being deceptive.
Accusing God of being deceptive, but not accusing me of being deceptive when I hypothetically do basically the same thing, tells me someone is confused.
Sorry, 46, I've already lost interest in this thread.
Usually one like this has a shelf life of about a half hour, then it goes stale rather quickly.
I plan to use it to QV people to, when I see them accusing God of being deceptive.
Accusing God of being deceptive, but not accusing me of being deceptive when I hypothetically do basically the same thing, tells me someone is confused.
In any event, I'm gong to read-only mode here.
Sorry, 46, I've already lost interest in this thread.
Usually one like this has a shelf life of about a half hour, then it goes stale rather quickly.
I plan to use it to QV people to, when I see them accusing God of being deceptive.
Accusing God of being deceptive, but not accusing me of being deceptive when I hypothetically do basically the same thing, tells me someone is confused.
In any event, I'm gong to read-only mode here.
Don't worry, it won't be long tell you create yet another version of this tired old question.Sorry, 46, I've already lost interest in this thread.
Usually one like this has a shelf life of about a half hour, then it goes stale rather quickly.
AmazingI plan to use it to QV people to, when I see them accusing God of being deceptive.
Accusing God of being deceptive, but not accusing me of being deceptive when I hypothetically do basically the same thing, tells me someone is confused.
Heard that one before.In any event, I'm gong to read-only mode here.
Science can answer this one. Because science clearly says that Adam had a belly button. Francis Collins says: "Adam was the infusion of the soul, of the moral law, free will and the fall. These are critical to our understanding of God's character and our own." Was Adam in the Bible a historic figure? According to Collins you can defend either way. From my extensive study of the Bible and ancient history I believe Adam was a real person. But that does not really matter when you look at the transition mankind went though at the time.AV, you still haven't answered me this though, do you think God created Adam with a belly button? Cavities in his teeth?
Science can answer this one. Because science clearly says that Adam had a belly button. Francis Collins says: "Adam was the infusion of the soul, of the moral law, free will and the fall. These are critical to our understanding of God's character and our own." Was Adam in the Bible a historic figure? According to Collins you can defend either way. From my extensive study of the Bible and ancient history I believe Adam was a real person. But that does not really matter when you look at the transition mankind went though at the time.
Science tells us that the real beginning of disease was when man began to build cities. Back when man was a hunter gather there was not nearly as much disease. Disease came with the moral decline.
Yes, But I am not so sure that Eve had a belly button because we are told that God made Eve from Adams rib. That means that Eve had the same MtDNA as Adams mother, aunt or sister. In the case of Abraham, Sarah was his sister: "the daughter of my father but not the daughter of my mother; and she became my wife". But they did not share the same MtDNA.So that we are perfectly clear, what you are saying is that Adam was in the womb of a woman and was connected to her through an umbilical cord, that is why he had a belly button, right?
Actually it does. The VERY FIRST public building was little more then a brothel as far as I am concerned. There are still some like them in India today.Disease being spread in cities has nothing to do with "moral decline" and everything to do with population densities.
Actually it does. The VERY FIRST public building was little more then a brothel as far as I am concerned. There are still some like them in India today.[FONT=Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]Göbekli Tepe was a temple with prostituted or perhaps what people like Martin Sheen would call a goddess.There is a lot of stuff in the Bible about how they were suppose to stay away from those places.
[/FONT]
Yes, But I am not so sure that Eve had a belly button because we are told that God made Eve from Adams rib.
Actually it does. The VERY FIRST public building was little more then a brothel as far as I am concerned. There are still some like them in India today. Göbekli Tepe was a temple with prostituted or perhaps what people like Martin Sheen would call a goddess.There is a lot of stuff in the Bible about how they were suppose to stay away from those places.
STD exist. Yes we have more drugs now. Back when I was in High School there use to be lots of stories of people who died from sexually transmitted diseases. My question to you is do you really think there were no STD's 10,000 years ago? Then why are there so many warnings in the Bible to stay away from those women and those kind of places?I don't understand what the VERY FIRST brothel has to do with disease spread NOW.
I tend to believe we should follow the Bible. For me the diet prescribed by Moses looks very much like the diet prescribed by the American Heart Association. If you want good heath then you need to eat right and do what the Bible says to do. If you do not follow the Bible then do not expect to live as long and do not expect to be as healthy as you would or you could be. People say we do not need to follow the Bible. Yet they are dropping like flies from sickness and disease.Oh, so you don't really mean "diseases", do you? You actually mean sexually transmitted diseases...
Again your argument is with science not the Bible. Because the dust of the ground is talking about the elements that makes up man. I for one love the poetry in the Bible. I would not be willing to change the translation to make it easier for people like you to understand. That would no longer be a translation, that would be a paraphrase or a commentary.God also says he made Adam from dust of the ground, and that didn't stop you from saying he had a belly button, what is the difference?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?