My Pool Challenge

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

Only on paper.Made-up events: like asteroid strikes and whatnot.
...
And while I applaud your concatenation skills, your history is full of more holes than Clyde Barrow.

At least that's consistent - true to your sig, you deny the real-word evidence that contradicts your storybook.

 

[doubtingmerle]

Only on paper.Made-up events: like asteroid strikes and whatnot.

And while I applaud your concatenation skills, your history is full of more holes than Clyde Barrow.23 October 4004 BC

Nope.

The evidence for evolution is not only on paper. It is literally cast in stone.

 

[AV1611VET]

It is literally cast in stone.

That stone has a lot of missing links.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

That stone has a lot of missing links.

By the same token it also has a lot of solid links.

 

[AV1611VET]

By the same token it also has a lot of solid links.

I think "links" is the key word here.

Are we dealing with Darwin's Tree, or Adam's Orchard?

Evolutionists would say Darwin's Tree, by way of links.

Literal creationists would say Adam's Orchard, with no links.

The Bible breaks the tie.

 

[Psalm 27]

Nope.

The evidence for evolution is not only on paper. It is literally cast in stone.

The stones would cry out

 

[Bungle_Bear]

I think "links" is the key word here.

Are we dealing with Darwin's Tree, or Adam's Orchard?

Evolutionists would say Darwin's Tree, by way of links.

Literal creationists would say Adam's Orchard, with no links.

The Bible breaks the tie.

So funny how you go from "a lot of missing links" to "no links" as if nobody would notice. You lose again

 

[AV1611VET]

So funny how you go from "a lot of missing links" to "no links" ...

That's because I don't believe there are any links.

The grass, created before the sun, has no links to the trees.

In fact, here's a list of things that can't be linked:

1. Earth before Sun
2. Light before Sun
3. Plants before marine organisms
4. Fruit bearing trees before fish
5. Birds before insects
6. Plants before Sun
7. Man before rain

Why can't they be linked? because they were created in an instant: orchard style.

Evolution, on the other hand, says there is a way to biologically link ... say ... #3 above, by tracing their DNA backwards through deep time.

But in so doing, they encounter more missing links than a men's jewelry store that's been robbed.

 

[doubtingmerle]

The stones would cry out

I don't believe in talking stones (or talking donkeys).

But I do believe the record written in the stones.

If there have not been millions of years of evolution, why do the stones so clearly indicate that is what happened?

 

[AV1611VET]

If there have not been millions of years of evolution, why do the stones so clearly indicate that is what happened?

You're trained to see that.

A good example is the Grand Canyon.

Some are trained to think it was forged by the Colorado River,* others are trained to think it was created by an act of God.

* Nevermind the fact that the Mississippi River didn't forge anything. Where is the "grand canyon" of the Midwest?

 

[SelfSim]

You're trained to see that.

A good example is the Grand Canyon.

Some are trained to think it was forged by the Colorado River,* others are trained to think it was created by an act of God.

* Nevermind the fact that the Mississippi River didn't forge anything. Where is the "grand canyon" of the Midwest?

Sorry .. no one can respond to this because its a 'problem post'!
(This is not a response).

 

[AV1611VET]

Sorry .. no one can respond to this because its a 'problem post'!
(This is not a response).

Oh, sorry.

I wasn't baiting or anything.

 

[Psalm 27]

I don't believe in talking stones (or talking donkeys).
But I do believe the record written in the stones.

If there have not been millions of years of evolution, why do the stones so clearly indicate that is what happened?

an ammonite fossil and a nautilus shell-each according to their kind

I don't believe in talking stones (or talking donkeys).

But I do believe the record written in the stones.

If there have not been millions of years of evolution, why do the stones so clearly indicate that is what happened?

 

[Psalm 27]

ammonite fossil and nautilus shell. similar, little change in approximately 6000 years-He made them all-each according to their kind

Genesis 1
1
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth...
31
...Then God saw everything that He had made, and indeed it was very good. So the evening and the morning were the sixth day.

 

[doubtingmerle]

You're trained to see that.

A good example is the Grand Canyon.

Some are trained to think it was forged by the Colorado River,* others are trained to think it was created by an act of God.

* Nevermind the fact that the Mississippi River didn't forge anything. Where is the "grand canyon" of the Midwest?

Intereting. So all those buried fossils and buried sand dunes were just made to look like they were the result of millions of years of axtivity?

Why would God create all those rock layers to tell a complex history that never happened?

 

[AV1611VET]

Why would God create all those rock layers to tell a complex history that never happened?

LOL -- God can't win in academia, can He?

Genesis 1 has cosmic evolution twisted into a pretzel in the following ways:

1. Earth before Sun
2. Light before Sun
3. Plants before marine organisms
4. Fruit bearing trees before fish
5. Birds before insects
6. Plants before Sun
7. Man before rain

... and academia says it's because Genesis 1 is a myth.

But God cleans up the flood nice and neat, line upon line, in some geologic order, and academia says it shows Genesis 1 is a myth.

Solid aurum.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

LOL -- God can't win in academia, can He?

Genesis 1 has cosmic evolution twisted into a pretzel in the following ways:

1. Earth before Sun
2. Light before Sun
3. Plants before marine organisms
4. Fruit bearing trees before fish
5. Birds before insects
6. Plants before Sun
7. Man before rain

... and academia says it's because Genesis 1 is a myth.

But God cleans up the flood nice and neat, line upon line, in some geologic order, and academia says it shows Genesis 1 is a myth.

Solid aurum.

Tsk, academia - what are they like? Unbelievable, isn't it?

What about the magic pixies that turned the moon into cheese a couple of million years ago, then changed it back again a million years later? Academia would have you believe it never happened...

 

[VirOptimus]

Tsk, academia - what are they like? Unbelievable, isn't it?

What about the magic pixies that turned the moon into cheese a couple of million years ago, then changed it back again a million years later? Academia would have you believe it never happened...

The cheesus gospels?

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

The cheesus gospels?

It was parmesan, for a celebration of the Spaghetti Monster, bless His noodly appendages

 

[Bungle_Bear]

LOL -- God can't win in academia, can He?

Your version of God can't win because you keep painting him into unwinnable corners. For example:

But God cleans up the flood nice and neat, line upon line, in some geologic order

I thought the animals were supposed to have been buried during the flood. You are saying that your version of God came along after the flood and reburied them in a specific order. If that's the story you want to stick to then of course your God cannot win - he's more deceitful than satan.