• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

My Omphalos Challenge

thaumaturgy

Well-Known Member
Nov 17, 2006
7,541
882
✟12,333.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I don't --- I wouldn't trust the public education system to teach my children anything about the Bible.

Why? I mean, if it's all there, all obviously laid out, how could the public education system mess that up?

:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheManeki
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,333
52,693
Guam
✟5,169,055.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why? I mean, if it's all there, all obviously laid out, how could the public education system mess that up?

:)

Oh, I'm sure they'd find ways. Like denying a global flood, calling it a talking snake, getting the "sons of God" in Genesis 6 wrong and, dare I say, THE biggest, most unpardonable of all errors --- using the wrong text.
 
Upvote 0

Domenico

Sacrifice to the Gods of Speed
Jun 10, 2007
1,021
65
Dunedin, New Zealand
✟24,012.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
AV, not everyone uses the King James...

And, as a psych student, you are deeply fascinating. I dont think I have ever seen any case of cognitive dissonance that is so deep rooted. (cognitive dissonace fascinates me) Is there any part of you that twiches when you say things like "The universe is 4.5 billion years old, but it was created 6100 years ago"? How did you come to belive such oxymorons as "maturity without history"? Because I honestly cannot get my head around the concept. Its like rejecting something deeply fundamental in us, and embracing something that shouldnt, and maybe doesnt, make any sense at all.
 
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
20,182
3,189
Oregon
✟960,546.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
Oh, I'm sure they'd find ways. Like denying a global flood.........
Now that I understand how you have one foot in a religious beliefs for a 6100 year creation and your other foot standing in the science that describes a 14 Billion year old universe, how does that same process work for a Biblical Flood? Or does it?

Science is not able to find any evidence what so ever for a Biblical Flood. As far as science is concerned, it never happened. But the Bible said it happened. Based on the Bible you also say a Biblical flood happened.

You argue Omphalos as the means that narrows and even closes the gap between two opposing dichotomies where science describes an old universe and the Bible describes a young universe. So I’m wondering why your not able to do the same with the Biblical Flood? Or are you.

.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,333
52,693
Guam
✟5,169,055.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
AV, not everyone uses the King James...

And, as a psych student, you are deeply fascinating. I dont think I have ever seen any case of cognitive dissonance that is so deep rooted. (cognitive dissonace fascinates me) Is there any part of you that twiches when you say things like "The universe is 4.5 billion years old, but it was created 6100 years ago"? How did you come to belive such oxymorons as "maturity without history"? Because I honestly cannot get my head around the concept. Its like rejecting something deeply fundamental in us, and embracing something that shouldnt, and maybe doesnt, make any sense at all.

Cognitive Dissonance, or "known anxiety," occurs when someone buys a product, and by the time he gets it home (or shortly thereafter), is having doubts (anxiety) about the purchase.

That's why manufacturers put that paragraph right in the front of the owner's manual that says something to the effect:
  • Thank you for buying this washer. It was built to give you years of maintenance-free service and, rest assured, you have made a great choice. We're sure you'll enjoy this product for many years to come.
The most famous remark made by someone suffering cognitive dissonance is:
  • WOW! I could have had a V8!
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,333
52,693
Guam
✟5,169,055.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
How did you come to belive such oxymorons as "maturity without history"? Because I honestly cannot get my head around the concept. Its like rejecting something deeply fundamental in us, and embracing something that shouldnt, and maybe doesnt, make any sense at all.

It doesn't take a Rhodes Scholar, Domenico to ascertain this.
  1. According to the Bible, the earth has been in existence only 6100 years and, in fact, predates the sun, moon, and stars.
  2. According to science, the earth is 4.57 billion years old.
Can statements 1 and 2 be reconciled? Some see these two statements and just assume they're contradictory; but a close examination shows they do not violate the Law of Non-contradiction. In other words, they can be reconciled.

Now, Domenico, you take it from here and let's see how you would do so.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,333
52,693
Guam
✟5,169,055.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You argue Omphalos as the means that narrows and even closes the gap between two opposing dichotomies where science describes an old universe and the Bible describes a young universe. So I’m wondering why your not able to do the same with the Biblical Flood? Or are you.

I'll answer the Flood question, but first, let me say this. I do not argue Omphalos. I have been accused of being Omphalos, and it upsets me very much.

The Bible does not describe a young universe.
 
Upvote 0

Phred

Junior Mint
Aug 12, 2003
5,373
998
✟22,717.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
It doesn't take a Rhodes Scholar, Domenico to ascertain this.
  1. According to the Bible, the earth has been in existence only 6100 years and, in fact, predates the sun, moon, and stars.
  2. According to science, the earth is 4.57 billion years old.
Can statements 1 and 2 be reconciled? Some see these two statements and just assume they're contradictory; but a close examination shows they do not violate the Law of Non-contradiction. In other words, they can be reconciled.

Now, Domenico, you take it from here and let's see how you would do so.
But they don't have to be reconciled. The Bible is wrong. See how easy that was?
 
Upvote 0

Phred

Junior Mint
Aug 12, 2003
5,373
998
✟22,717.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I'll answer the Flood question, but first, let me say this. I do not argue Omphalos. I have been accused of being Omphalos, and it upsets me very much.

The Bible does not describe a young universe.
No matter... there simply wasn't a global flood.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,333
52,693
Guam
✟5,169,055.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Science is not able to find any evidence what so ever for a Biblical Flood. As far as science is concerned, it never happened. But the Bible said it happened. Based on the Bible you also say a Biblical flood happened.

Yes, a global flood occurred. Science cannot find evidence for it because God cleaned it up. You don't flood the entire earth to a depth of 15 cubits above the highest mountain*, then drop back and let nature take its course. Nature couldn't have reversed the effect of the Flood if she had wanted to. Thus, the only conclusion is that God cleaned up the mess, Himself.

* I have reason to believe that these mountains were much higher back then than our highest mountains today. Possibly 50,000 feet high, but that's another story.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,333
52,693
Guam
✟5,169,055.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
And all of that to cling to a particular, overly literal, reading of Scripture. I think a degree of pride and stubbornness comes into play at some point.

Jesus interpreted the Scriptures literally, and so do we. You're going to have to drop using a literal interpretation as an ad hominem. It doesn't work.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,333
52,693
Guam
✟5,169,055.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Is this Biblical?

Is what Biblical? That God cleaned it up?

No --- it is not documented as such; but look at it this way. Who is the only one who had the ability to do so?

Noah? Satan? Demons? Angels?

You think God just sat there and watched them clean the water up against His will?
 
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
20,182
3,189
Oregon
✟960,546.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
Is what Biblical? That God cleaned it up?

No --- it is not documented as such; but look at it this way. Who is the only one who had the ability to do so?

Noah? Satan? Demons? Angels?

You think God just sat there and watched them clean the water up against His will?
Why would God even need to clean up after causing a Global Flood?

I'm not wanting to be rude, really I'm not...but your suggestion that God cleaned up after the flood that He caused to happen and with out that clean up being documented in the Bible, just seems to me to be completely out there in the land of make believe.



.
 
Upvote 0

Domenico

Sacrifice to the Gods of Speed
Jun 10, 2007
1,021
65
Dunedin, New Zealand
✟24,012.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
AU-Greens
It doesn't take a Rhodes Scholar, Domenico to ascertain this.
  1. According to the Bible, the earth has been in existence only 6100 years and, in fact, predates the sun, moon, and stars.
  2. According to science, the earth is 4.57 billion years old.
Can statements 1 and 2 be reconciled? Some see these two statements and just assume they're contradictory; but a close examination shows they do not violate the Law of Non-contradiction. In other words, they can be reconciled.

Now, Domenico, you take it from here and let's see how you would do so.
The only way to reconcole those statments is to say that yes, the universe has existed for 4.5 billion years, and thus it must have existed for 6100 years, plus 4.49 billion odd years as well. While it doesnt take a Rhodes Scholar to realise that the bible and science say different things, Im fairly sure no Rhodes Scholar would ever claim that they are actually the same.

Oh, and cognitive dissonance is far more than just buying the wrong drink. It can lead to violence as one seeks to destroy the anxiety with actions that, conversely, only serve to make the anxiety more entrenched.
 
Upvote 0

Split Rock

Conflation of Blathers
Nov 3, 2003
17,607
730
North Dakota
✟22,466.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Why would God even need to clean up after causing a Global Flood?

I'm not wanting to be rude, really I'm not...but your suggestion that God cleaned up after the flood that He caused to happen and with out that clean up being documented in the Bible, just seems to me to be completely out there in the land of make believe.



.
This is a good example of a Bible Literalist interpreting scripture. They do it all the time, while simultaneously claiming it is wrong to interpret scripture.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,333
52,693
Guam
✟5,169,055.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Why would God even need to clean up after causing a Global Flood?


For safety and sanitary reasons.

I'm not wanting to be rude, really I'm not...but your suggestion that God cleaned up after the flood that He caused to happen and with out that clean up being documented in the Bible, just seems to me to be completely out there in the land of make believe.

Why? I'm not following your logic here. Just how large do you want the Bible to be anyway? Besides, He gave us just what He wanted us to have. Nothing more, nothing less.

[bible]Deuteronomy 29:29[/bible]

History books today are just like that. The Chicago Fire, the San Francisco earthquake, the Galveston Flood, et.al. Who cleaned those up? If it's not documented, is the story "completely out there in the land of make believe"?
 
Upvote 0