Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
If I created something ex nihilo that said it was made in Japan, does that mean it wasn't created ex nihilo?[Pedant]
Trademark and patent, not copyright
[/pedant]
Ex nihilo, as I stipulated?Yup, because it would be made in japan
If you make something ex nihilo and say it wasn't, you are lying.If I created something ex nihilo that said it was made in Japan, does that mean it wasn't created ex nihilo?
Where did I say it wasn't?If you make something ex nihilo and say it wasn't, you are lying.
"Let God be true and every man a liar"Where did I say it wasn't?
If you want to add to my challenge in an attempt to nullify it, then I'll add to it to keep it valid.
It was made in Japan ex nihilo and brought to you.
Now ... care to step out of character (i.e., set your science aside) and do something really weird: answer my challenge as I wrote it, please?
Isn't it interesting that people who have their heads stuck to clipboards think we should jettison our faith in favor of an evidence-based style of hermeneutics; when they don't even have the decency to admit there are some things God did that didn't generate evidence?"Let God be true and every man a liar"
Software driving it would be a copyright violation.[Pedant]
Trademark and patent, not copyright
[/pedant]
Not at all, but God being a liar is inconsistant with being God. It creates an internal paradox with your challenge akin to "God makes an apple, but God says he didn't make an apple, and is being truthful about not making an apple because, you know, God and all" such paradoxes cannot be true or false as they are not internally consistant.Isn't it interesting that people who have their heads stuck to clipboards think we should jettison our faith in favor of an evidence-based style of hermeneutics; when they don't even have the decency to admit there are some things God did that didn't generate evidence?
True I suppose, but at least theoretically you could license the softwareSoftware driving it would be a copyright violation.
God creates an iPad ex nihilo and gives it to you.
Everyone you tell laughs at you.
Convince them otherwise, or explain why you can't.
Thank you, Jacks!I could convince some but not others.
"Now faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the conviction of things not seen. For by it the people of old received their commendation. By faith we understand that the universe was created by the word of God, so that what is seen was not made out of things that are visible."
because...
"They have mouths, but they cannot speak; They have eyes, but they cannot see; They have ears, but they cannot hear; They have noses, but they cannot smell; They have hands, but they cannot feel; They have feet, but they cannot walk;"
BTW Great to have you back!
That's childish talk, If there is no evidence how on earth would anyone know anything had been done?when they don't even have the decency to admit there are some things God did that didn't generate evidence?
By faith.That's childish talk, If there is no evidence how on earth would anyone know anything had been done?
Funnily enough, this just happened to me.God creates an iPad ex nihilo and gives it to you.
Your presumption would be in error, wouldn't it?I would presume hallucination.
Groovy.Funnily enough, this just happened to me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?