ImmortalTechnique
Senior Veteran
noah never existed... he's a fairy tale... neanderthals did, but no one was around to write fairy tales about them... we weren't writing yet
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Neo-Darwinist fables about human origins in Africa are fairy tales. Who do you think wrote the epic of Gilgamesh if not Neanderthal descents of Neanderthal Noah?ImmortalTechnique said:noah never existed... he's a fairy tale... neanderthals did, but no one was around to write fairy tales about them... we weren't writing yet
john crawford said:Neo-Darwinist fables about human origins in Africa are fairy tales. Who do you think wrote the epic of Gilgamesh if not Neanderthal descents of Neanderthal Noah?
john crawford said:Neo-Darwinist fables about human origins in Africa are fairy tales.
All right. I can take a hint. Neo-Darwinist monkey theories are adult fish stories and children's fairy tales because whales walk on land, fish magically turn into amphibians, leaping lizards learn to fly like birds and hairy apes are mysteriously transformed into Neo-Darwinists by natural selection and genetic deformities.BeamMeUpScotty said:So, please enlighten us, how do you know "neo-darwinists" wrote fairy tales about human origins, but not the writers of the Bible (hint: you can't use the Bible to justify your answer as that's circular reasoning)?
Nice post FSHWILDFIRE. I enjoyed reading it.FSHWILDFIRE said:As an evo bio major...
john crawford said:All right. I can take a hint. Neo-Darwinist monkey theories are adult fish stories and children's fairy tales because whales walk on land, fish magically turn into amphibians, leaping lizards learn to fly like birds and hairy apes are mysteriously transformed into Neo-Darwinists by natural selection and genetic deformities.
Wow, I really would have expected better of you by now, john. What a crock of lies. You know evolutionary theory says none of these things and yet you continue to say it does. You are lying. There is no other word for it. You are saying something you have been told time and again is incorrect on this very forum.john crawford said:All right. I can take a hint. Neo-Darwinist monkey theories are adult fish stories and children's fairy tales because whales walk on land, fish magically turn into amphibians, leaping lizards learn to fly like birds and hairy apes are mysteriously transformed into Neo-Darwinists by natural selection and genetic deformities.
It doesn't need to be proven. He's still lying. john is claiming that evolutionary theory states something that it doesn't. Since he has been told otherwise, his statement is a lie. There is no other way of putting it. Liar is the appropriate term. In fact, john isn't claiming just one thing that evolutionary theory doesn't actually propose, he's claiming a number of things. All of the claims he has made are lies.Lignoba said:im am all for evolution, however i dont think we can call anyone a liar. Evolution has not, and probably will not ever be proven.
Jan87676 said:Well, from what I know, my grandfather wasn't a monkey. We have a common ancestor with monkeys. Creationists are right, your grandfather was not a friggin' monkey.
john crawford said:Normal powers of human speech ought to qualify most humans for unique membership in a Human order and family of primates.
We are apes, right now.Jan87676 said:Creationists are right, your grandfather was not a friggin' monkey.belladonic-haze said:No...Apes, we have a common ancestor with APES!
Actually, he was. Look it up.And my great great grand father wasn't an ape either......Evolution doesn't go that quickly!
No theory is ever proven. Even those which have been around for centuries and are the basis for all kinds of scientific advancement aren't what one could consider absolutely proven. The reason for this is obvious. Isaac Newton came up with the basics for general gravitational theory. Even when man was beginning to send rockets into space, much of that same basic theory was being put into practice and found to be accurate. Does that prove the theory? Does it then change from theory to proven fact? No, because later Einstein showed that while Newton's basic ideas were generally accurate, there were still situations, unknown to Newton, wherein some of his observations failed to be true. So theory, no matter how accurate it may prove itself to be against the evidence at any given time, will never become "proven fact", simply because science recognizes that we never have all of the evidence. And with new evidence sometimes comes the necessity of revising theory.Lignoba said:im am all for evolution, however i dont think we can call anyone a liar. Evolution has not, and probably will not ever be proven.
You are lying if you say that humans in Africa originated from apes or ape ancestors.Dannager said:You are lying. There is no other word for it. You are saying something you have been told time and again is incorrect on this very forum.
Evolutionists call Christian creationists liars all the time and then lie about human evolution from African apes or ape ancestors by saying it is a fact rather than only a neo-Darwinist racial theory.Lignoba said:im am all for evolution, however i dont think we can call anyone a liar. Evolution has not, and probably will not ever be proven.
Since none of what you say is true it must be as big a lie as the neo-Darwinist lie that African people originated from apes or ape ancestors.Dannager said:It doesn't need to be proven. He's still lying. john is claiming that evolutionary theory states something that it doesn't. Since he has been told otherwise, his statement is a lie. There is no other way of putting it. Liar is the appropriate term. In fact, john isn't claiming just one thing that evolutionary theory doesn't actually propose, he's claiming a number of things. All of the claims he has made are lies.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?