Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Congratulations you have given an example of a violation of causality.The light we're seeing from SN1987A could have left yesterday, if God so willed it.
Revelation 6:14a And the heaven departed as a scroll when it is rolled together;
Would you like a violation of the laws of thermodynamics as well?Congratulations you have given an example of a violation of causality.
Because you are taught it was emitted 170,000 years ago.sjastro said:If the light was emitted yesterday why do we call it SN1987A and not SN2022?
If you can roll a three-dimensional universe up as a scroll, then I would assume a fourth dimension is needed to do so ... correct?Are you suggesting that this passage was referring to wormholes? Or did you just find a passage that contains a synonym for a word I used and thus conclude it was relevant to the discussion?
Would you like a violation of the laws of thermodynamics as well?
I'll be more than happy to show you.
Because you are taught it was emitted 170,000 years ago.
Stop with the whataboutisms and address the issue.Would you like a violation of the laws of thermodynamics as well?
Oh you mean when Henrietta Swan Levitt discovered Cepheid variables in the LMC in 1908, the very satellite galaxy SN1987A originated from, to establish the luminosity distance relationship of Cepheids which was calibrated to great accuracy using trigonometric parallax on the star Delta Cephei with the Hubble Space telescope.I'll be more than happy to show you.Because you are taught it was emitted 170,000 years ago.
This is hilarious using your own fairytale as a reference.
Glad you like'em!This is hilarious using your own fairytale as a reference.
Two wrongs don't make a right.
You are prime DK material.
I think you know why:If the actions of God resulted in the light of the supernova being emitted yesterday which can travel "jillions of kilometers" in a very short period of time than why do we call it SN1987A instead of SN2022?
1987A's light reached Earth on February 23, 1987,
Being a fairytale is was quite boring.Glad you like'em!
knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone's own interpretation. 21 For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit. (2 Peter 1: 20-21)
If that offends conservative Christians, then perhaps they have something better they can present?The thread was ridiculed across the board from using a fairytale as a substitute for the science, to the gross misinterpretation of Bible verse to make up the story which I imagine is highly offensive to conservative Christians based on this verse.
I note the penny still hasn't dropped.
So you accept no responsibility for butchering the Bible.If that offends conservative Christians, then perhaps they have something better they can present?
Until then: YMMV.
Are you going to stand up and tell us this verse does not apply to you in the slightest.knowing this first of all, that no prophecy of Scripture comes from someone's own interpretation. 21 For no prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit. (2 Peter 1: 20-21)
Where did I say it was created yesterday, then observed in 1987?If God created the supernova yesterday it was October 17 2022, the supernova was observed February 23 1987.
If you can roll a three-dimensional universe up as a scroll, then I would assume a fourth dimension is needed to do so ... correct?
And correct me if I'm wrong, but don't even scientists says there are some eleven or fourteen dimensions of space?
And didn't Paul mention four dimensions?
Ephesians 3:18 May be able to comprehend with all saints what is the breadth, and length, and depth, and height;
That's your opinion, isn't it?So you accept no responsibility for butchering the Bible.
You're desperate to keep yourself confused, aren't you?I've asked you a few times now to clearly define what direction those dimensions measure.
Okay. This time, I'll humor you. But believe me, I'd better see a light bulb come on, or I'm going to start humoring your questions in another far less serious way.Kylie said:You always refused to answer.
Notice you gave me only three axes, but are asking for four?Kyle said:But since you bring it up again, I'll ask you again. Below is a diagram of a cube with the X, Y, and Z axes labelled. Which axis corresponds to breadth? Which corresponds to length? Which to depth? And which to height?
Show me, dear self-confused one, where I ever said that.Wow. You can tell that a particular supernova was created as a home for a particular angel.
Nope. I wouldn't either. Since you misquoted me (as usual).Kylie said:Tell me, do you think for a second that I'm going to find that anything close to convincing?
Good. I don't take that seriously either. I take what I really said seriously. Not your self-confused version.Kylie said:I see no reason why I should take it seriously.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?