• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

My Finch Challenge

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dorothy Mae

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2018
5,657
1,017
Canton south of Germany
✟82,714.00
Country
Switzerland
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
This is what you said in post #229: "His book was actually helpful to slavers because it distinguished races from one another and called it the struggle to survive between favored races. And it is true that some slavers decided that people of African descent were not really human beings. Darwin's theory an help that one along."

Do you have evidence to back up this claim, yes or no?
Ok I take it back.
 
Upvote 0

Dorothy Mae

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2018
5,657
1,017
Canton south of Germany
✟82,714.00
Country
Switzerland
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You mean like distorting "child in the womb" to "fetus" to justify abortion?
Pretty similar to “collateral damage” or “friendly fire” instead of killing the wrong people.
 
Upvote 0

Dorothy Mae

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2018
5,657
1,017
Canton south of Germany
✟82,714.00
Country
Switzerland
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Darwin's use of the term "races" was basically synonymous with variations in species. In his writings he uses the term with respect of various species not just humans.

We have to be careful not to distort the context of the word as it was used at the time.
Why was the title changed if that’s the case?
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,196
7,477
31
Wales
✟429,207.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Pretty similar to “collateral damage” or “friendly fire” instead of killing the wrong people.

Not really the same. Collateral damage means extra damage outside of an intended action, and friendly fire refers to specific situations where a unit is fired upon by another unit from their their same armed forces or an allied armed forces unit.
They both have their specific meanings and refer to specific situations.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: AV1611VET
Upvote 0

Dorothy Mae

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2018
5,657
1,017
Canton south of Germany
✟82,714.00
Country
Switzerland
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Not really the same. Collateral damage means extra damage outside of an intended action, and friendly fire refers to specific situations where a unit is fired upon by another unit from their their same armed forces or an allied armed forces unit.
They both have their specific meanings and refer to specific situations.
Except they are the same in that innocent persons are killed. To those who died, which words matter little.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,196
7,477
31
Wales
✟429,207.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Why was the title changed if that’s the case?

It wasn't changed, just shortened. I can go on Amazon right now and get the book and it will be listed under its full name of On the Origin of Species: By means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,196
7,477
31
Wales
✟429,207.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
Except they are the same in that innocent persons are killed. To those who died, which words matter little.

Except that they refer to specific situations which add context to what happened. Again: Collateral damage means extra damage outside of an intended action, and friendly fire refers to specific situations where a unit is fired upon by another unit from their their same armed forces or an allied armed forces unit.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,999
52,622
Guam
✟5,143,639.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Dorothy Mae

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2018
5,657
1,017
Canton south of Germany
✟82,714.00
Country
Switzerland
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It wasn't changed.
Yes it was. Don’t you know?

Title today, “On the Origin of species.”

Original title: “On the Origin of Species by means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favored Races in the Struggle for survival.”
 
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,196
7,477
31
Wales
✟429,207.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single

Ah, so you ignored my comment in post #248: It wasn't changed, just shortened. I can go on Amazon right now and get the book and it will be listed under its full name of On the Origin of Species: By means of Natural Selection or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.