Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No. In theory, at least, it would be possible for a computer running a genetic algorithm to make a robot. So one cannot say that all robots that will ever be made will be designed by an intelligent being.
Show me the problems with definitions using BICYCLE as an example.
He refused to - saying that he doesn´t like definitions.Did Mr. Robot ever define what a robot is or did I miss it?
This is why I think it's reasonable to say evolution is a design process, though not a purposeful one; a process of 'bottom-up' design, producing competence without comprehension. Natural selection filters according to the implicit design criterion of survival.... In theory, at least, it would be possible for a computer running a genetic algorithm to make a robot. So one cannot say that all robots that will ever be made will be designed by an intelligent being.
Genetic algorithms can in theory make a robot just like genetic processes make penguins
And could not the designer of the algorithm be an algorithm that designs algorithms?but such an algorithm need a design too.
ok. do you agree that by definion a BICYCLE is a product of design?
Yes sure - when your point consists of mere semantics trickery...Oh, I guess it is kind of risky to actually define what you keep talking about.
No - looks like a self-replicating watch to me.so you cant say if this is a car?:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f1/Wiki_libra.jpg/220px-Wiki_libra.jpg
It's not a car, it's a JPG image.so you cant say this is a car without defining it first?:
(image from wiki)
There is a penguin designing process already--evolution.
Design by an intelligent agency, yes.
.
No, its a car. jpg images dont have wheels.It's not a car, it's a JPG image
but such an algorithm need a design too.
That's just the appearance of wheels, they don't really turn.No, its a car. jpg images dont have wheels.
How can you tell that just from the picture?That's just the appearance of wheels, they don't really turn.
Because it's just a picture. Send it back for a refund, you won't be driving it anywhere. You could print it out though, if that helps.How can you tell that just from the picture?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?