My Enoch Challenge

[AV1611VET]

Have you stopped beating your wife, yet?

Why? do you hear yelling?

 

[JustMeSee]

Wood boat?

Most people think Noah's Ark was a ship -- but the Bible never calls it a 'ship'.

It was actually a submarine.

Notice that it is described as having 'one window' (periscope) at the top:

Genesis 6:16a A window shalt thou make to the ark, and in a cubit shalt thou finish it above;

... thus the Ark was not subject to the stresses that would have been placed on ships on the surface.

Are you sure about that?

 

[AV1611VET]

Are you sure about that?

It's a Poe ... a joke.

 

[TLK Valentine]

It's a Poe ... a joke.

To clarify, what makes it a Poe is the notion that it's no more or less asinine than some of the other "theology" you sincerely try to fob off on this forum.

 

[AV1611VET]

To clarify, what makes it a Poe is the notion that it's no more or less asinine than some of the other "theology" you sincerely try to fob off on this forum.

I'd say my worst theology beats your best science any day of the week; but we're just throwing opinions back and forth, aren't we?

 

[Subduction Zone]

I'd say my worst theology beats your best science any day of the week; but we're just throwing opinions back and forth, aren't we?

Pull the other one, it has bells on.

Trust AVET to make a totally indefensible statement everyday.

 

[Strathos]

I don't get it

 

[mzungu]

Pull the other one, it has bells on.

Trust AVET to make a totally indefensible statement everyday.

Are you a Brit The Yanks do not have that saying; At least not that I know of!

 

[TLK Valentine]

I'd say my worst theology beats your best science any day of the week;

Of course you'd say that; it's classic you.

but we're just throwing opinions back and forth, aren't we?

Perhaps -- except our opinions have facts to back them up.

On the other hand, Embedded Age, Noah coming from New Jersey, and flood waters sent to Neptune to warn off would-be rebel angels are, among your other doozies, completely lacking in any kind of factual support.

After all, if you had anything vaguely resembling a fact, you wouldn't post "challenge" threads like this one demanding that the rest of us prove your fairy tales for you, now would you?

 

[AV1611VET]

Of course you'd say that; it's classic you.

I aim to pleez.

Perhaps -- except our opinions have facts to back them up.

Facts supported by moving goalposts.

On the other hand, Embedded Age, Noah coming from New Jersey, and flood waters sent to Neptune to warn off would-be rebel angels are, among your other doozies, completely lacking in any kind of factual support.

If you have better explanations, I'm all ears.

At least I put Mr. Noah in [what is now] New Jersey; others say he didn't exist.

If you think he existed, then you tell me where he lived.

Or perhaps you don't have the guts to speculate?

After all, if you had anything vaguely resembling a fact, you wouldn't post "challenge" threads like this one demanding that the rest of us prove your fairy tales for you, now would you?

I don't deal in facts, I wasn't called to be a scientist.

 

[Mr Strawberry]

I don't deal in facts

True, you deal in fantasy.

I wasn't called to be a scientist.

Was there something you were called to be?

 

[TLK Valentine]

I aim to pleez.

You aim to amuse -- and you aim well.

Facts supported by moving goalposts.

What moving goalposts? How about you provide some facts of your own for a change, then?

If you have better explanations, I'm all ears.

Mythology. Done.

At least I put Mr. Noah in [what is now] New Jersey; others say he didn't exist.

Well, there's your better explanation right there -- he didn't exist.

If you think he existed, then you tell me where he lived.

I don't -- hence my better explanation.

Why are creationists too lazy to do their own work -- or any work, for that matter? Even you, AV, demand that the rest of us prove your fairy tales for you.

Or perhaps you don't have the guts to speculate?

I don't need to speculate -- I deal in facts -- you don't.

I don't deal in facts, I wasn't called to be a scientist.

You weren't called to be anything, AV -- you called yourself to be... well, whatever it is you want to call yourself.

I sincerely hope you consider yourself entertainment -- everyone else does.

 

[JustMeSee]

nvm

 

[AV1611VET]

Do you have Biblical verses supporting the statement that we should not pay attention to the physical world?

Thanks.

My ... you dragged that one out of mothball, didn't you?

I'm glad you did.

Here ya go ...

Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

And let me clarify that it is: "Don't pay attention to the physical world, over what the Bible says."

 

[Mr Strawberry]

My ... you dragged that one out of mothball, didn't you?

I'm glad you did.

Here ya go ...

Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

And let me clarify that it is: "Don't pay attention to the physical world, over what the Bible says."

The Bible is part of the physical world. So your last statement is self-contradictory.

 

[JustMeSee]

My ... you dragged that one out of mothball, didn't you?

I'm glad you did.

Here ya go ...

Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

And let me clarify that it is: "Don't pay attention to the physical world, over what the Bible says."

This thread is from 2011. I was reading from the start.
I noticed how you edited it to make it say what you wanted it to say.

 

[eclipsenow]

My ... you dragged that one out of mothball, didn't you?

I'm glad you did.

Here ya go ...

Colossians 2:8 Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, and not after Christ.

And let me clarify that it is: "Don't pay attention to the physical world, over what the Bible says."

Let me clarify that for you: people, don't respond to this guy! He's an internet troll out to flame the world of science and embarrass his own faith with his open displays of ignorance. He thinks he's being a good 'witness' but is about as annoying as that group that turn up to homosexual funerals and oh-so-lovingly shout "God hates gays!" He's about at that level.

My advice? Do the WORST thing possible for an internet troll. Rob him of his audience, and just put him on your ignore list.

 

[AV1611VET]

I noticed how you edited it to make it say what you wanted it to say.

I edited what?

 

[Wiccan_Child]

He thinks he's being a good 'witness' but is about as annoying as that group that turn up to homosexual funerals and oh-so-lovingly shout "God hates gays!" He's about at that level.

That's a little extreme.

My advice? Do the WORST thing possible for an internet troll. Rob him of his audience, and just put him on your ignore list.

My ignore list is difficult to get into; only the cream of the crop have that honour

 

[AV1611VET]

Let me clarify that for you: people, don't respond to this guy! He's an internet troll out to flame the world of science and embarrass his own faith with his open displays of ignorance. He thinks he's being a good 'witness' but is about as annoying as that group that turn up to homosexual funerals and oh-so-lovingly shout "God hates gays!" He's about at that level.

My advice? Do the WORST thing possible for an internet troll. Rob him of his audience, and just put him on your ignore list.

Wake up, newbie.

Some of these guys have put up with me here for almost seven years now, and although they may not like me particularly well, they have respect for my faith ... and dare I say, some even learn a thing or two.

You, on the other hand, come in here displaying a short fuse; and I have a feeling you're not going to get much sympathy from even my antagonists.

(I could be wrong though. )