My Darwin Slave Challenge

[[serious]]

Does Mother Nature approve of slavery?

Mother nature doesn't have consciousness with which to approve or disapprove of anything.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Could we leave human slavery out of this thread, please?

No, because I know the actual reason for this thread is because you cannot reconcile your own beliefs with the fact that Bible clearly endorses slavery.

 

[[serious]]

Could we leave human slavery out of this thread, please?

If you want to redefine slavery, you will have to expressly give another definition. I won't even reference pluto when you define the term. I promise.

 

[AV1611VET]

Mother nature doesn't have consciousness with which to approve or disapprove of anything.

Say "hello" to Matt Dillon for me there, will ya?

 

[AV1611VET]

No, because I know the actual reason for this thread is because you cannot reconcile your own beliefs with the fact that Bible clearly endorses slavery.

More like: let's yak a simple challenge apart until Shannon entropy prevails and dilutes it.

Verbal homeopathy in action.

 

[[serious]]

Say "hello" to Matt Dillon for me there, will ya?

I don't get the reference.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

More like: let's yak a simple challenge apart until Shannon entropy prevails and dilutes it.

Verbal homeopathy in action.

OR, and here's a really novel idea, you could actually just say what you really want to say instead of just leading everyone on this endless cycle of someone asking you a simple question and you respond with asinine nonsense.

 

[AV1611VET]

I don't get the reference.

Dodge.

 

[AV1611VET]

OR, and here's a really novel idea, you could actually just say what you really want to say ...

My preference is question marks ... not periods.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

My preference is question marks ... not periods.

What is the point of this thread?!

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Dodge.

No, I don't get the reference either.

 

[AV1611VET]

No, I don't get the reference either.

Mother nature doesn't have consciousness with which to approve or disapprove of anything.

Nice dodge.

Nice way to avoid answering the question.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Nice dodge.

Nice way to avoid answering the question.

How can we answer the question if we don't get the reference?

 

[AV1611VET]

What is the point of this thread?!

Mother Nature is corrupt and immoral, since she supports slavery.

And her disciples won't admit it.

Which, of course, I don't expect them to.

And even attempting to invoke her prophet, Charles Darwin, is grounds for ridicule.

Which, of course, I expect.

 

[AV1611VET]

How can we answer the question if we don't get the reference?

Dodging it doesn't help, does it?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Mother Nature is corrupt and immoral, since she supports slavery.

Can nature be corrupt, immoral and support slavery if nature is an environment, not an intelligent entity?
I'll answer for you: it can't.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Dodging it doesn't help, does it?

How can we dodge the question if we do not understand the reference when you say "Say 'hello' to Matt Dillon for me, will you?"

 

[AV1611VET]

Can nature be corrupt, immoral and support slavery if nature is an environment, not an intelligent entity?
I'll answer for you: it can't.

Say "hello" to Festus for me, will ya?

 

[AV1611VET]

How can we dodge the question if we do not understand the reference when you say "Say 'hello' to Matt Dillon for me, will you?"

Do you understand it now?

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Say "hello" to Festus for me, will ya?

I repeat:
Can nature be corrupt, immoral and support slavery if nature is an environment, not an intelligent entity?
I'll answer for you: it can't.