Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Is it Christian virtue that leads you to make upThe appeal of Darwin was that he gave people an excuse not to believe in God, and since there is no God (to them), then they could do whatever they wanted without feelings of guilt.
I thought Galileo was the father of science. Darwin never was considered any such thing.Scientists would have to find a new father.
Cute.I thought Galileo was the father of science. Darwin never was considered any such thing.
LOLIs it Christian virtue that leads you to make up
something so mean spirited about people youve never
seen and know nothing about?
Its hilarious how this gem is pulled out on a regular basis but this man came up with a development where Thalidomide pales by comparison and caused 1.2 million premature deaths a year, lowered the IQ of countless children and probably drove many to violence.After all, their haste to do things is what gave us a generation of thalidomide children, isn't it?
Agent Orange?So who was this man and what did he develop that led to widespread misery for the human race?
There is plenty of evidence for macroevolution. Creationists can not provide any evidence, as in zero, that small changes, i.e. micro evolution suddenly stops before specification.Third because Darwin put in his own test to falsify his theory. “ if anyone can show an organism developed from other than small change, my theory is false. “
Only on paper, chief -- only on paper.Hundreds of studies verify the facts of evolution, at both the microevolutionary and macroevolutionary scale—from the origin of new traits and new species to the underpinnings of the complexity we see in life and the statistical probability of such complexity arising.
Agent Orange?
Tetraethyllead (commonly styled tetraethyl lead), abbreviated TEL, is an organolead compound with the formula Pb(C2H5)4. It is a fuel additive, first being mixed with gasoline beginning in the 1920s as a patented octane rating booster that allowed engine compression to be raised substantially. This in turn increased vehicle performance and fuel economy.[3][4] TEL was first synthesised by German chemist Carl Jacob Löwig in 1853. American chemical engineer Thomas Midgley, who was working for General Motors, was the first to discover its effectiveness as an antiknock agent in 1921, after spending several years attempting to find an additive that was both highly effective and inexpensive.
Concerns were later raised over the toxic effects of lead, especially on children.[5] On cars not designed to operate on leaded gasoline, lead and lead oxides coat the catalyst in catalytic converters, rendering them ineffective, and can sometimes foul spark plugs.[6] Starting in the 1970s, many countries began phasing out TEL in automotive fuel. In 2011 a study, backed by the United Nations, estimated that the removal of TEL had resulted in $2.4 trillion in annual benefits, and 1.2 million fewer premature deaths.[7]
I got it in sentence one!Its hilarious how this gem is pulled out on a regular basis but this man came up with a development where Thalidomide pales by comparison and caused 1.2 million premature deaths a year, lowered the IQ of countless children and probably drove many to violence.
We are still suffering the consequences today.
This man credited his development “In part to luck and religion as well as to the application of science”.
So who was this man and what did he develop that led to widespread misery for the human race?
Here is a hint where does the origin of the word plumbing come from and this material was once used to improve performance of a well known commodity?
There is plenty of evidence for macroevolution. Creationists can not provide any evidence, as in zero, that small changes, i.e. micro evolution suddenly stops before specification.
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution
15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense
Hundreds of studies verify the facts of evolution, at both the microevolutionary and macroevolutionary scale—from the origin of new traits and new species to the underpinnings of the complexity we see in life and the statistical probability of such complexity arising.Creationists need to either stop spreading nonsense or come up with their own testable hypotheses that can be supported by evidence and make predictions.
Well, AV1611VET, it is time to grow up. Facts don’t care about your feelings. And if your feelings get hurt because different sciences find things you don’t like, then too bad for you but you’ll have to accept them.I have to assume that, in the academic arena, he is considered more right than wrong, since he's being so venerated.
But please understand that, where he is wrong, I have no choice but to let it matter to me.
Especially when it comes time to vote on school levies.
Nope. The only arbiter in evaluating a scientific theory is evidence. Empirical evidence. Scientific theories are science's playground, and there counts science's rules.If Darwin said ANYTHING that contradicts the Bible, Darwin is wrong.
A child wouldn’t know better. It would simply parrot what adults have told him - so its the adult who places himself in an undeserved position of authority. But this/these adult(s), who at least understand(s) that it needs years of study at a college or university to master a science -or any other academic subject for that matter - has no excuse. An adult has at least seen a few textbooks on the shelves of a bookshop. Knows the existence of universities and research institutes. Might have seen a documentary or two with labs and sophisticated lab equipment in the background. An adult might have had a chemistry lesson or two in high school, and struggled with calculus, to understand that these subjects require an effort to master.So any small child that says God created the earth is placing himself in the position of knowing more than any physicist, geologist, biologist etc on earth?
Evidence can be manipulated.Nope. The only arbiter in evaluating a scientific theory is evidence. Empirical evidence.
Only on paper, chief -- only on paper.
I don't know where you get your information about evolution but I do know it is not from reliable or trusted sources. See:Why do evolutionists consistently use the term NEW SPECIES, and not NEW GENUS?
Could it be because God said they would only multiply after their own KIND (genus)?
the heart tissue forensic evidence in so called Eucharistic miracles , And the forensics of the bleeding statue of Cochabamba triggers that test. Complex Human tissue that didn’t come from progressive change. It wa far too rapid for that. And it was progressive change , so not a substitution.
The ToE is a consilience of multiple unrelated scientific fields. You can call those fields a 'hodgepodge' but you would be wrong just as wrong as you are about scientific evidence being 'pure' supposition.If you have followed my posting on evolution you will know that I agree within the context of what is proven. But evolution is not a single theory , it is a hotch potch of theories , hypotheses , and in places pure supposition.
Fraud will always come about - and is a career killer. It's not making a career more difficult, it's a career killer.Evidence can be manipulated.
Interesting word choice.If you want to suggest that all the data supporting the Theory of Evolution is manipulated or fraudulent, you'll have a hell of job to prove it or -in your case - to even understand it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?