My Big Bang Challenge

[AV1611VET]

What could have prevented the Big Bang?

 

[jacks]

Nothing, it was God's will. (If it happened at all...)

 

[Strathos]

What could have prevented the Big Bang?

God could have prevented it, but He didn't. As for what else could have prevented it, unknown.

 

[John Bowen]

There was never a big bang that theory has been disproved by recent discoveries.Scientists have discovered the universe is expanding in accelerated rate.How can something be expanding after a initial explosion ? The Bible tells us how creation started God said . " Let there be light ! " he didn't say let there be a explosion . When you go see a movie there is a projector sending light on to a movie screen that creates images that appear real. When we want to create something we have a image in our mind then we go out and create it. We don't throw a stick of dynamite into a forest and get a house from it .

 

[Bungle_Bear]

What could have prevented the Big Bang?

A more phased approach?

 

[Silmarien]

There was never a big bang that theory has been disproved by recent discoveries.Scientists have discovered the universe is expanding in accelerated rate.How can something be expanding after a initial explosion ? The Bible tells us how creation started God said . " Let there be light ! " he didn't say let there be a explosion . When you go see a movie there is a projector sending light on to a movie screen that creates images that appear real. When we want to create something we have a image in our mind then we go out and create it. We don't throw a stick of dynamite into a forest and get a house from it .

You do realize that the Big Bang theory is good for Abrahamic religions, right? It's literally, "Let there be creatio ex nihilo," because just about everyone in their right mind would have expected an eternal universe instead. This is a situation where modern science supports biblical claims against their seemingly more reasonable contenders, so the hostility to it really doesn't make any sense to me at all.

 

[AV1611VET]

You do realize that the Big Bang theory is good for Abrahamic religions, right?

I somehow don't think Abraham wrote of it.

 

[Silmarien]

I somehow don't think Abraham wrote of it.

He didn't write the New Testament either. Or the Old Testament, for that matter.

Fun fact: George Lemaître, the astronomer who proposed the Big Bang theory, was a Catholic priest. Just in case anyone thought the long tradition of cleric-scientists was dead.

 

[John Bowen]

Real science Quantum Physics proves nothing is created by a big bang after 80 yrs of experiments . That's what Jesus Christ taught us "consciousness" the kingdom of God is within you.That's how he healed the withered arm , turned water into wine by projecting his will .The devil doesn't want you to know this so they teach big bang , along with evolution in schools so we won't follow Jesus Christ when he said, " The works I do you shall do and greater "

 

[DogmaHunter]

Real science Quantum Physics proves nothing is created by a big bang after 80 yrs of experiments . That's what Jesus Christ taught us "consciousness" the kingdom of God is within you.That's how he healed the withered arm , turned water into wine by projecting his will .The devil doesn't want you to know this so they teach big bang , along with evolution in schools so we won't follow Jesus Christ when he said, " The works I do you shall do and greater "

What incoherent babbling....

 

[Tolworth John]

What could have prevented the Big Bang?

A gnaB giB !

 

[Belk]

What could have prevented the Big Bang?

More discerning producers or a poor showing in the pilot.

 

[AV1611VET]

More discerning producers or a poor showing in the pilot.

Would you clarify please?

 

[46AND2]

Would you clarify please?

The Big Bang Theory sitcom...

 

[AV1611VET]

The Big Bang Theory sitcom...

Ah, thank you!

 

[dreadnought]

What could have prevented the Big Bang?

Had the Lord decided he just wanted to spend all his time on the beach sipping lemonade.

 

[Justatruthseeker]

What could have prevented the Big Bang?

You assuming there was one as secular science epicycles teach....

 

[Justatruthseeker]

Quantum physics is useless, it can't even predict reality.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/life-and-physics/2011/oct/11/1?newsfeed=true

"The bits when isn't mostly involve the strong nuclear force, Quantum Chromodynamics. That's why it's called the strong force. (We don't intentionally obfuscate, it's tough enough as it is.)

For example, aspects of how quarks and gluons are distributed inside the protons we collide can't be calculated from first principles. Neither can the way the quarks and gluons turn in to new hadrons in the end. We have some constraints from our theory, we have basic stuff like the conservation of energy and momentum, and we have a lot of data from other places. But we can't use perturbation theory. The coupling number gets near to one, and 1 x 1 x 1 x ... = 1. This means no matter how many particles you include in your calculation, you don't converge on a solid answer. In the end we have to make educated guesses, or models. And these are always adjustable."

He then goes on to describe how they use the results of the "rigid" perturbation theory which isn't really solid as he just admitted it didn't let you converge on any solid number or answer, but had to be fudged, with monte carlo event generators..... "Anyway, marrying the squidgy models to the rigid perturbation theory is mostly done using Monte Carlo event generators."

So basically they are random sampling something that regardless of the numbers of particles they sample "But we can't use perturbation theory"....... "This means no matter how many particles you include in your calculation, you don't converge on a solid answer"

There is so much delusion and double-talk they try to confuse you instead of just admitting the truth. They cant match theory to experiment without fudging the numbers, or as they put it, tuning it to fit the data...... and still regardless of how many particles you include, it doesn't work.....

 

[Hans Blaster]

Quantum physics is useless, it can't even predict reality.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/life-and-physics/2011/oct/11/1?newsfeed=true

"The bits when isn't mostly involve the strong nuclear force, Quantum Chromodynamics. That's why it's called the strong force. (We don't intentionally obfuscate, it's tough enough as it is.)
..."

There is so much delusion and double-talk they try to confuse you instead of just admitting the truth. They cant match theory to experiment without fudging the numbers, or as they put it, tuning it to fit the data...... and still regardless of how many particles you include, it doesn't work.....

All that cut-and-paste and you didn't understand what you were copying.

The article said nothing about the general applicability of quantum mechanics to predict things, only to the difficulties of QCD, the quantum theory of nuclear physics.

Even then it was only noting the difficulty of using what is a standard method elsewhere in physics (perturbation theory) in QCD. Nothing about the difficulties of perturbative QCD impact the usefulness of QM in atomic physics, etc.

 

[Kylie]

What could have prevented the Big Bang?

Given that there is no definitive explanation of how it happened, why do you think this question is answerable?