Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You cannot just decree that certain evaluations of your pathetic challenge are inherently the "wrong perspective". If you are unable to take criticism for your rubbish then you should not put it up in the public domain.
I would show him the lepticon readings. Since he knows that lepticons are only present when something is created ex nihilo he would be convinced.
I create an apple ex nihilo into the palm of your hand.
What evidence would you use to convince your friend I did this?
Sorry. I know you didn't do it. So I'm going to hit myself on the head with a big cartoon hammer because I'm in toon-town being asked alice in wonderland questions.
Oh, now there's the kicker! This question isn't meant for us but rather AV should be asking the Mad Hatter! Anyone have his Number? Then maybe we can finally find someone who AV can debate with on an Equal footing.
It's a science question; and I should be asking the Mad Hatter?
Interesting.
The result is the same if i tried to convince a friend you did it, or god or a leprechaun or Santa clause. I would still need evidence. If i had no evidence how could i be sure you were not a figment of my imagination.Um ... let's take another look at our OP, k?
Um ... let's take another look at our OP, k?
Um ... let's take another look at our OP, k?
The result is up to your friend -- not you.The result is the same if i tried to convince a friend you did it, or god or a leprechaun or Santa clause.
I would still need evidence.
If i had no evidence how could i be sure you were not a figment of my imagination.
That's assumed in the premise.First, you'll have to convince ME that you created it Ex Nihilo.
If you created something ex nihilo there would be lepticons all over your hands.
This would be circumstantial evidence enough to convince my friend.
Nevermind -- I'll w/d my question to you.How would quoting me on that be relevant?
"If"? "Something"?
Do you have a proper grasp of the OP, Belk; because your word choices are, to me, exposing an attitude that says you're taking this none too seriously.
I could be wrong though.
[Monty Python]Fair enough -- that's all I'm asking.
So is arguing for evidence for something that came into existence ex nihilo.
It's a science question; and I should be asking the Mad Hatter?Interesting.
According to creationists it's impossible for the universe to be created from nothing, so to overcome this fact they needed to create something that could create something from nothing, so they found a god who was not made from nothing but was always there lurking in the background, (how they found him god only knows)
The story goes that he revealed himself to some bronze age people who wrote down what he said to them,
sadly this god has not been seen or heard from since so we only have their word that this god ever existed at all,
but it would seem that for some their word is more than enough.
According to the laws of nature, it IS impossible.
So the source MUST be supernatural as science has ruled out natural causes. But we didn't make this up. Its a story Jesus told. You need to evaluate the sanity of Jesus as your first task.
I know that you want to point out the difference between science and the supernatural but the problem is that you seem to not understand the difference yourself. The question in the OP has nothing to do with science and therefore not worth debating.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?