Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Your ignorance of Bible terms.Other than your ignorance of science, what do you think was demonstrated?
How so?Your history needs an upgrade, my friend.
Np. The greed and callus cruelty of the Versailles court. Plus their utter lack of connection to reality... Added to the brutal taxation of the proletariat. And a string of military failures abroad.Science was to blame for the French Revolution.
That was not science. It was hereditary nobility, backed by the church.Their attempt to mess with things they shouldn't have been messing with was so oppressive to the common people, they decided they'd had enough.
And those ideas came AFTER the revolution. And were also not science.Trying to change the times to ten-hour days, with ten-day weeks and ten-month years just didn't cut it.
FYI fetus pre-dates child in the womb. Who has done the changing? And I'm not aware of any scientific publication where "miracle" has been replaced by "magic". Could you provide a specific example?Your ignorance of Bible terms.
You asked for an example to my Number Three point.
You don't even realize science plutoed "child in the womb" to "fetus," do you?
How about "miracles" to "magic"?
Non sequitur.I'm sure we would.
Anyone who believes Jesus walked on water deserves to fail any exam, don't they?
Not at all.I'm sure we would.
Anyone who believes Jesus walked on water deserves to fail any exam, don't they?
Thanks for the QED.FYI fetus pre-dates child in the womb. Who has done the changing? And I'm not aware of any scientific publication where "miracle" has been replaced by "magic". Could you provide a specific example?
Until it does sequiter ... right?Non sequitur.
I really wish you'd spend more time here.Not at all.
Lol. Demonstrating your errors and asking for evidence of non-existent things is now taken as a demonstration of you being correct?Thanks for the QED.
I am usually busy with life.I really wish you'd spend more time here.
Praying for you.I am usually busy with life.
I am currently sick with covid. So I have time.
Let me guess - if what you're praying for happens, that's evidence of the power of prayer. But if it doesn't happen, that's evidence that God has other plans, right?Praying for you.
(And not to a milk carton, either.)
That's about it.Let me guess - if what you're praying for happens, that's evidence of the power of prayer. But if it doesn't happen, that's evidence that God has other plans, right?
Heads you win, tails I lose.....
Depends. Was I filling it or drinking from it?That's about it.
Is your glass half-full or half-empty?
Post 5 please.The OP offers at least an interesting challenge, and very few people have actually attempted it.
1) The Theory of Evolution is rock solid and well supported by a wide variety of evidence from different subsectons of the life sciences.My personal opinion is that as evolution is false there are no aliens out there,
Trolling thus.so I'm hummouring an atheist.
You are right, of course, and I am wrong. I should have mentioned some passages from 'The Voyage of the Beagle" or "Principles of Geology" from Charles Lyell. A mistake I wont make anymore.The book Origins of Species, makes no claims about the age of the earth, so it would not be very useful to them anyways.
I'm sure they would be able to measure the ratio of lead to uranium in a few rock samples. They would determine the Earth to be at least 3.5 billion years old. That being the age of the oldest exposed large scale formations.
After how much fidgeting with the data?1) The Theory of Evolution is rock solid and well supported by a wide variety of evidence from different subsections of the life sciences.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?