- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,855,620
- 52,515
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
How many acts of abiogenesis were performed in Genesis 1?
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I'll pass.Define 'abiogenesis' and 'acts'.
Actually I'm looking for "zero," but I see where you're coming from.Unless I'm misunderstanding the question, I'd say lots! All the vegetation, "swarms" of living creatures both in and out of the ocean. All the animals, fish, birds, insects and of course man. Though I know your challenges can be tricky, so I wouldn't be surprised if the answer was "none" or "one", but for now I'm sticking with "lots!"
I'm not surprised.Yours is a question without meaning then ..
Rats! I knew I should have waited until there were more clues...Actually I'm looking for "zero," but I see where you're coming from.
if abiogenesis is performed then doesn't it negate it from being abiogenesis?How many acts of abiogenesis were performed in Genesis 1?
Zero. Genesis is fiction.
That's like asking why people engage with the OP, who seems to be trolling anyway. Except bringing up Genesis' fictionality is hardly unreasonable when this is a science forum and a vast minority of Xians refer to Genesis as anything of a science reference. If one can substantiate it, then go for it, but otherwise it's specious and speculative nonsense, little different than fiddling with Nostradamus' propheciesMay I ask why you're even here?
That's like asking why people engage with the OP, who seems to be trolling anyway. Except bringing up Genesis' fictionality is hardly unreasonable when this is a science forum and a vast minority of Xians refer to Genesis as anything of a science reference. If one can substantiate it, then go for it, but otherwise it's specious and speculative nonsense, little different than fiddling with Nostradamus' prophecies
This site is a major source of un-moderated, (maybe even sanctioned?), pseudoscience, anti-science and misinformation.I just don't understand the point in making an account to join a Christian forum when you're obviously an atheist. Why bother?
Actually I'm looking for "zero," but I see where you're coming from.
May I ask why you're even here?
This site is a major source of un-moderated, (maybe even sanctioned?), pseudoscience, anti-science and misinformation.
(Thus far, this looks to be the specific purpose of this thread too, what's more).
Because not all understanding is merely academic and impersonal. Even listening to others in terms of devotional and personal aspects of their faith can aid in understanding, even if the ultimate conclusion is still disagreement about the truth claims made based on said faith.I just don't understand the point in making an account to join a Christian forum when you're obviously an atheist. Why bother?