• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Musical Instruments in Worship

Originally posted by wildernesse
I agree with you that congregational worship should be interactive and participatory. I also agree that this is the ideal and something not often acheived completely.

Do you think that a choir selection where the congregation is not part of the activity (singing) is poor worship, though? Well, let's not say poor let's say less than ideal. If you do, does this also apply to a sermon? During the teaching part of our worship there is little active participation in the teaching--I will say that there is still worship occurring in both--meditating on the message of the song and Bible teaching and praising God for what you learn are both types of complementary worship to these activities in my mind.

I do agree that it would be best if the congregation did participate in the choral performance--and our choir often encourages this when the song is familiar to the general congregation. Our music minister also is quick to say that choir isn't about performance art--it's about praise, and while he hope we do the best we can, our singing is not about performing but about worship. The same is true for the instrumentalists who accompany us.

--tibac

The admonition is to sing to one another.  As long as choirs are doing the singing, I think you've lost an opportunity to up lift people.  I recommend songs that switch back and forth between the choir and the congregants or the cantor, like "Amen."  BUT when the choir starts performing, I think about whether people like the show so much that they would show up on a Friday night to hear the choir sing thier song.
 
Upvote 0

cougan

Senior Member
Apr 21, 2002
766
7
53
Visit site
✟23,856.00
Faith
Christian
Scott you should of told me earlier you were starting this thread. I had to search for it and I have read through it. I will humbly answer ALL of your arguements you have set forth tonight. I will set a side my baptism thread just for you so I can deal with you arguements. As always I hope that what I proclaim will be of benfit to others and cause them to go back to the bible and see what it really expresses on this topic. Please don't let what you THINK get in the way of bibical truth.

God Bless you all,
Cougan
 
Upvote 0

cougan

Senior Member
Apr 21, 2002
766
7
53
Visit site
✟23,856.00
Faith
Christian
Originally posted by wildernesse
Which verse are you speaking about that commands us to sing one to another?

Is it a command or an admonition? As someone else said, "just because it appears in the Bible as an imperative does not exclude the possibility that it is an admonition not a command". :)

--tibac

I have just enough time to answer your question really quick.

Ephesians 5:19 speaking one to another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody with your heart to the Lord;

Colossians 3:16 Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly; in all wisdom teaching and admonishing one another with psalms <I>and </I>hymns <I>and </I>spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts unto God.
 
Upvote 0

ScottEmerson

I Like Traffic Lights
May 9, 2002
366
0
46
Ocala, FL
✟682.00
Faith
Christian
Originally posted by FluviusNeckar
just because it appears in the Bible as an imperative does not exclude the possibility that it is an admonition not a command.&nbsp; [/B]

&nbsp;

An imperative is defined as, "Expressing a command or plea." So what is your point?
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by ScottEmerson
&nbsp;

An imperative is defined as, "Expressing a command or plea." So what is your point?

The point is that there exists a category of imperatives which reflect God's wise advice and admonition to us, the breach of which is not a sin. It's hard to imagine God imputes sin to the one who violates the imperative, "Sing!"
 
Upvote 0

ScottEmerson

I Like Traffic Lights
May 9, 2002
366
0
46
Ocala, FL
✟682.00
Faith
Christian
Originally posted by FluviusNeckar
The point is that there exists a category of imperatives which reflect God's wise advice and admonition to us, the breach of which is not a sin. It's hard to imagine God imputes sin to the one who violates the imperative, "Sing!"

&nbsp;

Biblical evidence?
 
Upvote 0

Mϋzikdϋde

Simply Fabulous
Sep 19, 2002
3,970
258
61
Colorado Springs
Visit site
✟28,025.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Originally posted by FluviusNeckar
The church has never been the main venue of entertainment---tell it to Rogers &amp; Hammerstein.&nbsp;

We have not agreed on what you say.&nbsp; I agree that we need Christian entertainment and that Christian entertainers need a venue.&nbsp; I add that the venue should not be the corporate worship time.&nbsp; Sunday morning was when Jesus rose from the dead.&nbsp; He didn't rise from the dead to give entertainenrs a forum for practicing their craft.

FluviusNeckar,

I'm not even talking about Sunday morning. Congregational worship is no time for entertainment. I'm talking about secular venues not opening their doors to Christian concerts. The larger churches open their doors and let groups play there. Would you come running in yelling about the den of thieves? What is it with you that drives you to condemn the actions of so many people? Are you so arrogant that when we agree on something you need to turn it into a disagreement? I NEVER said anything about entertainment and worship time being combined...in fact, I've stated more than once that they should be completely seperate (not only in this thread) But the church is a good venue for Christian entertainers to perform for Christians.

When I said that churches were venues for entertainment I was talking about the building not the service. That is something that was taught in one of my college history classes -&nbsp;I didn't live through the middle ages so I have no authority to argue with you on that point.

When I said we agreed, I meant on the point that Christians need entertainment...Period. I never even implied that it was to be during Sunday services. I would like to find some common ground with you but I realize now that you are content with turning common ground into uncommon ground for the sake of argument. Maybe you're such an expert&nbsp;that you would never concede to comprimise...
 
Upvote 0

cougan

Senior Member
Apr 21, 2002
766
7
53
Visit site
✟23,856.00
Faith
Christian
Scott, its taking me much longer than I thought to answer you arguements. Not because their hard but because I am doing it from scratch and I putting all my time and effort in to answering your arguements. I am just about finished with your first one and the others wont take near as long. I am not going to post it tonight because I want to present the response to all of your aguements at once. I pretty sure I will be done by tommorrow night but Im not going to make any promises this time just know that it is all that I am working on and as soon as its done I will post it for your consideration.

Cougan
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by ScottEmerson
&nbsp;

Biblical evidence?

&nbsp;

There is sin which leads unto death and sin which does not.&nbsp; Both are sin and violating one of Paul's admonitions may be classified as sin if you wish but in the end, no one is going to hell for failing to sing.&nbsp; Are you trying to establish singing as necessary to salvation?
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by muzikdude
FluviusNeckar,

I'm not even talking about Sunday morning. Congregational worship is no time for entertainment. I'm talking about secular venues not opening their doors to Christian concerts. The larger churches open their doors and let groups play there. Would you come running in yelling about the den of thieves? What is it with you that drives you to condemn the actions of so many people? Are you so arrogant that when we agree on something you need to turn it into a disagreement? I NEVER said anything about entertainment and worship time being combined...in fact, I've stated more than once that they should be completely seperate (not only in this thread) But the church is a good venue for Christian entertainers to perform for Christians.

When I said that churches were venues for entertainment I was talking about the building not the service. That is something that was taught in one of my college history classes -&nbsp;I didn't live through the middle ages so I have no authority to argue with you on that point.

When I said we agreed, I meant on the point that Christians need entertainment...Period. I never even implied that it was to be during Sunday services. I would like to find some common ground with you but I realize now that you are content with turning common ground into uncommon ground for the sake of argument. Maybe you're such an expert&nbsp;that you would never concede to comprimise...

&nbsp;

What is it that drives you to read condemnation into everything I write?

If churches want to open their doors to Christian converts, great!&nbsp; You did not originally specify that you were excluding Sunday mornings from your statement nor did you indicate that you were talking about the problem of finding a place for Chrisitan concerts modernly.&nbsp; In light of your clarifications, I'm not sure WHAT you meant by your statement that "historically" churches have been the main venue of entertainment.&nbsp; (You might be surprised with how much I agree with that statement.)

Your frustration with my posts comes from my requirement that we be precise in what we say and agree to.&nbsp; If your statements are susceptible of other meanings, it is your responsibility to be clear and to clarify.&nbsp; It ill behooves anyone to abandon the hope for common ground to preserve ambiguity.

Thank you for your clarifications.&nbsp;
 
Upvote 0

Mϋzikdϋde

Simply Fabulous
Sep 19, 2002
3,970
258
61
Colorado Springs
Visit site
✟28,025.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Originally posted by FluviusNeckar
&nbsp;

What is it that drives you to read condemnation into everything I write?

Reading into things that people say seems to run rampant around here. Maybe you should be more precise&nbsp;when stating&nbsp;how you feel about something

If churches want to open their doors to Christian converts, great!&nbsp; You did not originally specify that you were excluding Sunday mornings from your statement nor did you indicate that you were talking about the problem of finding a place for Chrisitan concerts modernly.&nbsp;

In retrospect, I mentioned that point in a different forum. My apologies, I got a little confused having the same basic conversation on two different sites.

&nbsp;In light of your clarifications, I'm not sure WHAT you meant by your statement that "historically" churches have been the main venue of entertainment.&nbsp; (You might be surprised with how much I agree with that statement.)

I did mention that I learned that in a college history class and I'm no expert in the area so I will not argue the point.

Your frustration with my posts comes from my requirement that we be precise in what we say and agree to.&nbsp; If your statements are susceptible of other meanings, it is your responsibility to be clear and to clarify.&nbsp; It ill behooves anyone to abandon the hope for common ground to preserve ambiguity.

It's amazing how I can misunderstand so much that you say and become so frustrated when you are fulfilling your own requirements so well... It is my responsibility to be clear...what is your responsibility?

Thank you for your clarifications.&nbsp;

You're welcome and thank you also
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by muzikdude
Reading into things that people say seems to run rampant around here. Maybe you should be more precise&nbsp;when stating&nbsp;how you feel about something


It's amazing how I can misunderstand so much that you say and become so frustrated when you are fulfilling your own requirements so well... It is my responsibility to be clear...what is your responsibility?

I accept my non-deligible duty to say what I mean and clarify my meaning if I have been ambiguous.&nbsp; But where I have been unambiguous, I the projector not the projectee must accept responsibility.
 
Upvote 0

Mϋzikdϋde

Simply Fabulous
Sep 19, 2002
3,970
258
61
Colorado Springs
Visit site
✟28,025.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Originally posted by FluviusNeckar
I accept my non-deligible duty to say what I mean and clarify my meaning if I have been ambiguous.&nbsp; But where I have been unambiguous, I the projector not the projectee must accept responsibility.

Now that, I understand
 
Upvote 0
Musical instruments in any form contain harmonics and resonances, that is what creates notes is resonance at a certain frequency. To say that instruments in worship are evil is to say all things are evil because all things resonate at their given harmonic, create a sound. We may not be able to hear many of them but they exist. There are many references to this truth in many religions(although I am a Christian), Christ, ...even the stones would sing, In the Hindu faith The Bhagavad Gita ( the song of God), in many ancient African faiths it is said God sang all into being, God made Satan into an instrument before he fell. So it is not the music that is evil it is the intentention of the musician. God did not create evil when Satan was fashioned into an instrument, but when Satan went against the truth he became evil. I also believe(personal opinion) that there is a great deal of beautiful music in Heaven, all things sing their own song, and eventually like the river emtying in the sea form a larger song which includes all existence.
It seems so many have this impression of God that he is some fuddy duddy that sits scowling upon his creations, I reject that, he is certainly Holy and perfect in every way, But in my experience my Father is really cool. He certainly hates sin because he sees how it hurts us. Heaven is a place of great beauty and joy. I believe that if anyone catches a glimpse of God's beauty they then will understand why it is a natural thing to worship Him, he is so beautiful, loving, and wise. And he backs that up with the beauty of His son as an example. Jam on folks, and sing a song of God's love in your life with every breath.
 
Upvote 0
Originally posted by Godiscool
To say that instruments in worship are evil is to say all things are evil because all things resonate at their given harmonic, create a sound.

Try inappropriate. Assuming the validity of your statement that all things resonate does not make all things appropriate. All things are lawful but not all things build up.

I don't even know that musical instruments are inappropriate let alone sinful but I do know that they end up monopolizing the worship and pushing congregants into passivity.
 
Upvote 0

cougan

Senior Member
Apr 21, 2002
766
7
53
Visit site
✟23,856.00
Faith
Christian
1.&nbsp;Arguments from silence are logical fallacies. COC states that musical instruments are prohibited because the NT does not speak of them. However, the NT doesn't speak of such things as hymnbooks, songs sung in English, or music leaders, Does this mean to include them as well is unbiblical?

I thank you Scott for your questions and now I will answer you questions to the best of my ability based off the word of God. You have basically stated with you argument above that just because musical instruments are not specifically mentioned in the NT as being part of Christian's worship that it does not mean they can't be used. First of all you admit that they are not mentioned or found in the NT being used in Christian worship. Then in you latter arguments you try and show that they are mentioned.&nbsp; Then you compare hymnbooks, songs sung in English, or music leaders to that of using musical instruments.&nbsp;

First lets deal with your silence of scripture argument. I don't think you put much thought into this my friend. You have just put yourself in one hairy predicament. This is what you are stating with your argument. IF THE&nbsp; BIBLE IS SILENT ON A SPECIFIC ISSUE THAN&nbsp; ITS OK TO DO IT. I really don't&nbsp; think you are willing to stand on what you have stated. I want to know where would you draw the line and why?

. Which of the following practices, if any, would you oppose if offered by Christians as worship to God?

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (a) Burning incense

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (b) Using rosary beads

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (c) Religious dancing

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (d) Handling snakes as a token of worship

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (e) Using meat and potatoes on the Lord's table

&nbsp;&nbsp; . If you would oppose any of the foregoing items, please state on what Scriptural basis you would do so.

If the silence of the scriptures are fallacy according to your view, then anything and everything that is not specifically mentioned in the bible can be done. I believe&nbsp; with all my heart that the bible teaches that only that which is authorized by the Bible is or can be pleasing to God. To clarify your position&nbsp; to me and the others&nbsp; reading&nbsp; this please answer the following&nbsp; questions.

&nbsp; 1. Please indicate whether each of the following statements is true or false:

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (a) Worship must be offered to God as authorized by Divine truth.&nbsp; True or false?

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (b) Worship may be rendered to God according to that which one devises and prescribes for himself.&nbsp; True or false?

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; (c) It is possible for there to exist in our day such a thing as vain worship.&nbsp; True or false?

&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2. Are there any restrictions on what a New Testament Christian may offer as worship to God?&nbsp; If so, please state what they are and how they may be determined.

I have a great&nbsp; respect for the silence of scripture and here is why. In Gen 6:14-22 God instructs Noah to make the boat out of Gopher wood. When God told him what to make it out of he excluded any other kind of wood. He did not have to say you cant&nbsp; use pine, oak….etc because God told him to use Gopher Wood. Another example is found in Lev 10:1-2 When Nadab and Abihu offer a STRANGE/UNAUTHORIZED FIRE. Obviously they&nbsp; did not follow what God said in Lev 16:12. He did not specifically condemn using some other kind of fire because he doesn't have to. When the word of God says something and you do something&nbsp; other than it says you will be doing something&nbsp; that is not authorized. So just because something&nbsp; is not specifically said it does not authorize you to do it.

&nbsp; "And whatsoever ye do, in word or in deed, do all in the name of the Lord Jesus, giving thanks to God the Father through him" (Col. 3:17).&nbsp; This verse says that regardless of our teaching or practice, it must come under the shelter of "doing all in the name of the Lord Jesus."&nbsp; "In the name of," means "by the authority of" and this is easily proven by Acts 4:7-10. The bible makes it crystal&nbsp; clear that&nbsp; we are not&nbsp; to go beyond that which is written 1Cor 4:6. Of course Scott&nbsp; would have us to believe that we can go beyond that which is written. We as Christians today should abide in the doctrine of Chirst (2John 1:9) and not doctrines of men (Mat 15:9)&nbsp; Again, in 2 John 1:9 it is said, "Whosoever transgresseth and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ hath not God."&nbsp; Doctrine is not to be treated frivolously.&nbsp; Paul said to Timothy, "Take heed unto thyself and unto the doctrine; continue in them, for in doing this thou shalt both save thyself and them that hear thee" (1 Tim. 4:16).&nbsp; He instructed Titus, "But speak thou the things which become sound doctrine" (Titus 2:1).

Now here is another powerful point I want you notice in 2 Cor. 5:7, Paul says, "For we walk by faith, not by sight."&nbsp; Again, in Heb. 11:6, "Without faith it is impossible to please him."&nbsp; Christianity is a system of faith, and our worship to God must be offered in faith in order to please Him.&nbsp; Where there is no Word, there can be no faith, for "faith cometh by hearing, and hearing by the word of God" (Rom. 10:17).&nbsp; Watch it, now -- no Word, no faith; no faith, no walking by faith; no walking by faith, no pleasing God! Now, that is simple, but it is Biblical and shows that we are to respect the silence of the scriptures.

Now with all this in mind I want to introduce 2 verses that tells us how it is we are to sing in our worship to God.


Colossians 3:16 Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly; in all wisdom teaching and admonishing one another with psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts unto God.
Ephesians 5:19 speaking one to another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody with your heart to the Lord;


Now consider the following&nbsp; chart.

The Bible&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp; The&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The
Commands&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; voice&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Instrument

Speak in song&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; can&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; cannot
Eph 5:19&nbsp;&nbsp;
Teach&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; can&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; cannot
Col 3:16
Admonish&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; can&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; cannot
Col 3:16
Make melody&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; can&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; cannot
In the heart
Eph 5:19


Both of these&nbsp; verses are telling&nbsp; us the same thing. In both verses one another is the same Greek word which obviously means everyone. Everyone is to speak, teach, and admonish one another in song. This is the only authority we have for singing. Everyone in the assembly must&nbsp; participate&nbsp; in the singing or they are in violation of these two passages. Then I want you to notice that both these passages teach that the type of singing is to be Psalms, hymns and spiritual songs. I would also like to add the following information on these 2 verses.

&nbsp;In Eph. 5:19-21 there are five plural participles which have imperative force in agreement with the verb:&nbsp; speaking ([@lalountes]), singing ([@adontes]), making melody ([@psallontes]), giving thanks ([@eucharistountes]), submitting yourself ([@hupotassomenoi]).&nbsp; These are plural, and the idea, therefore, is all of you speaking, all of you singing, all of you making melody, all of you giving thanks, all of you submitting yourselves." Notice further that the speaking is [@heautois], which is plural, meaning "to yourselves, to one another."&nbsp; Thayer defined it, "reciprocally, mutually, one another."


In Col. 3:16 we read, "Let the word of Christ dwell in you ...&nbsp; (The expression "in you" there is [@en] [@humin]. That is plural.) richly in all wisdom, teaching and admonishing one another ...&nbsp; (The word there is [@heautous].) ... in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord." Observe to whom the Colossian epistle is addressed:&nbsp; "To the saints and faithful brethren in Christ which are at Colossae" (Col. 1:2).&nbsp; Notice the language:&nbsp; "let dwell" (present imperative), "in you" (plural, that is in all of you), "one another" (a reciprocal pronoun denoting an interchange of action, according to Dana and Mantey's grammar, page 131). Please note that this&nbsp; construction is used when an "interchange of action" is suggested by the verb. This is accomplished when the church is engaged in congregational singing. When on group (such as a choir) sings for another group ( the listeners), no such interchange of action is involved. There is no authority for me to sing to you while you sit and listen in silence. Therefore solos and choirs are excluded from the worship God describes in the NT. Generally, people will admit that hymns, and spiritual songs&nbsp; mean sing. But some have tried to say that Psalms means instruments because the Old Testament Psalm included instrumental music. It should be noticed though&nbsp; that&nbsp; the instrument and the Psalm are not the same. Notice the words of Psalm 81:2 "Take a psalm, and bring hither the Timbrel, the pleasant harp with the Psaltery.
 
Upvote 0