[MOVED] What happens when a non-NASA astronaut is asked about the shape of the earth?

[d taylor]

Which version on what language do you believe is the real Bible ?

Which version and language is the real Bible.
Hebrew, Aramaic and the common every day Greek (NT)

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Which version and language is the real Bible.
Hebrew, Aramaic and the common every day Greek (NT)

Then why do you rely on English for so many of your interpretations?

For example, Adam is not just a personal name. The Hebrew word translates to "person", just as Eve ("Chava" in Hebrew) means "mother of life". As such Genesis 1 & 2 make far more sense as allegory than literal history. Since English "Adam" does not convey this meaning, you fail to get the deeper meaning and context - but you insist that your interpretation is correct.

 

[d taylor]

I believe these science astronaut fakers went to the moon 6 times back in the 1960's and 70's. They filmed themselves bouncing around and other really important task.

But not once did they take the camera and video the fake globe earth moving through the fake outer space.

They did create this fake earth rise and the duped ate it up and are still eating it up, waiting for the next lie.

Then the earth shrinks, what a lie.

 

[JackRT]

I find it quite unbelievable that an astronaut could make such statements. IT WOULD BE LIKE A Baptist MINISTER CLAIMING THE bIBLE WAS A FRAUD. oops

 

[Strathos]

So you're saying that they went to the moon... which, according to flat earthers, is somewhere in the atmosphere (in which case anyone could reach it by just using a plane, but putting that aside), they were able to somehow jump around in 1/6th of earth's gravity on the moon (even though, according to flat earthers, gravity doesn't exist, and the only reason things fall to the ground is because they are denser than their surroundings, except that the sun and the moon don't fall for some reason...) and they then used the 1960s version of photoshop to paste a round earth in the sky, after removing the flat earth which would have covered the entire sky, and this was all to serve this omnipotent conspiracy that the USA and USSR were totally working together on.


...makes perfect sense.

 

[Skreeper]

I believe these science astronaut fakers went to the moon 6 times back in the 1960's and 70's. They filmed themselves bouncing around and other really important task.

But not once did they take the camera and video the fake globe earth moving through the fake outer space.

They did create this fake earth rise and the duped ate it up and are still eating it up, waiting for the next lie.

View attachment 266989
View attachment 266990

Then the earth shrinks, what a lie.View attachment 266991

This guy answers all of your questions. Basically, in 1969 the technology didn't exist to fake the moon landing.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

So you're saying that they went to the moon... which, according to flat earthers, is somewhere in the atmosphere (in which case anyone could reach it by just using a plane, but putting that aside)

How do you explain this from 1988?

 

[Jimmy D]

What’s truly idiotic about this thread (apart from the fact that people think that the Earth is flat) is the idea that millions of people, physicists, governments, meteorologists, everyone involved in global travel for the last 600 years or so, space agencies, militaries, etc, etc are hushed up by the conspirators TM, but that this bloke can just pop up and reveal the big secret without as my trouble at all.

 

[d taylor]

What’s truly idiotic about this thread (apart from the fact that people think that the Earth is flat) is the idea that millions of people, physicists, governments, meteorologists, everyone involved in global travel for the last 600 years or so, space agencies, militaries, etc, etc are hushed up by the conspirators TM, but that this bloke can just pop up and reveal the big secret without as my trouble at all.

This guy answers all of your questions. Basically, in 1969 the technology didn't exist to fake the moon landing.

I do not have any questions that need answering. Science answers are lies so what the difference.

Since they have rejected the truth. I guess it is appropriate that atheist would put their faith in lies.

 

[Jonathan Walkerin]

I do not have any questions that need answering.

That kind of says it all.

 

[Jimmy D]

Science answers are lies so what the difference.

Bearing false witness? Careful there.

 

[JackRT]

gravity doesn't exist, and the only reason things fall to the ground is because they are denser than their surroundings

And density is a gravity linked concept.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

And density is a gravity linked concept.

Quite (in that context); it's only because of gravity that there is a 'down' direction.. In zero G, or without gravity, density makes no difference at all.

 

[d taylor]

So you're saying that they went to the moon... which, according to flat earthers, is somewhere in the atmosphere (in which case anyone could reach it by just using a plane, but putting that aside), they were able to somehow jump around in 1/6th of earth's gravity on the moon (even though, according to flat earthers, gravity doesn't exist, and the only reason things fall to the ground is because they are denser than their surroundings, except that the sun and the moon don't fall for some reason...) and they then used the 1960s version of photoshop to paste a round earth in the sky, after removing the flat earth which would have covered the entire sky, and this was all to serve this omnipotent conspiracy that the USA and USSR were totally working together on.


...makes perfect sense.

In my post i was not saying i believe they went to the moon, i do not believe a person has been to the moon. I personally believe the highest a person can go is about 19 to maybe 28 miles high

I was saying i believe as in i believe 6 times as opposed to 7 times or 8 times. Because i did not know actually how many times nasa has stated they went to the moon.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

In my post i was not saying i believe they went to the moon, i do not believe a person has been to the moon. I personally believe the highest a person can go is about 19 to maybe 28 miles high

I was saying i believe as in i believe 6 times as opposed to 7 times or 8 times. Because i did not know actually how many times nasa has stated they went to the moon.

Do you believe China has been growing plants on the moon?

 

[d taylor]

Do you believe China has been growing plants on the moon?

Why would i believe that.

Ok question for the science believers. what caused, what science calls craters on the moon.

 

[JackRT]

Why would i believe that.

Ok question for the science believers. what caused, what science calls craters on the moon.

Lunar craters were caused by impact with meteors, asteroids and comets. Some of the very oldest craters might have been volcanic in nature. Astronomers have actually observed a small number of impact events in real time.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

Why would i believe that.

Because it takes far less mental gymnastics to believe it than it does to believe in a global conspiracy to cover a fact nobody has any vested interest in covering. What's more, that conspiracy has involved billions of people from pretty much every country in the world, many of whom do not get along with each other and for a long time were, apparently, unaware of each other's existence, spanning thousands of years without a single rebel breaking ranks.

Why would anyone believe that sort of conspiracy story?

 

[renniks]

... it's flat!

Interviewer: "You've been there! Is earth really a sphere hanging in outer space?"

Hermaszewski: "Earth is flat, as some expect. I didn't expect this question. I assure you, it's flat."

Food for thought.

What did I just watch? First, I don't speak Russian so I have no idea what he really said. Second, he smirked like it was a joke. Third, I thought flat Earth crackpots didn't believe space exists?

 

[sjastro]

To those that denounce science go live in a cave and stop being hypocrites by enjoying the fruits and benefits that science offers through technology.