DCP said:
But, the Journal of Discourses wasn't a Mormon Church publication. It was a private publication encouraged by leaders of the Mormon Church so that the man who was responsible for putting them together could make a living off of them. Periodically, a plaudit or two were printed as introductory material but it does not change the fact that it was a private publication, NOT a Mormon Church publication. In my studies of these texts, I've found quite a few errors and omissions when comparing them to the actual manuscript evidence and official Mormon Church publications of the same talks. You also need to look at some more context. It might help you understand the texts better. You may not agree with everything in these texts (I certainly do NOT!) but you can at least try to understand them better.
Here is a quote from the very front of the First Volume of the JOURNAL OF DISCOURSES
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Journal of Discourses Volume 1
BY BRIGHAM YOUNG
President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints
HIS TWO COUNSELLORS,
THE TWELVE APOSTLES, AND OTHERS.
REPORTED BY G. D. WATT,
AND HUMBLY DIDICATED TO THE
LATTER-DAY SAINTS IN ALL THE WORLD
VOL. I
LIVERPOOL:
PUBLISHED BY F. D. AND S. W. RICHARDS 15, WILTON STREET.
LONDON:
LATTER-DAY SAINTS BOOK DEPOT, 35, JEWIN STREET, CITY.
1854
Letter From the First Presidency.
Great Salt Lake City, Utah Territory, June 1, 1853.
Elder Samuel W. Richards, and the Saints abroad.
Dear BrethrenIt is well known to many of you, that Elder George D. Watt, by our counsel, spent much time in the midst of poverty and hardships to acquire the art of reporting in Phonography, which he has faithfully and fully accomplished; and he has been reporting the public Sermons, Discourses, Lectures, &c., delivered by the Presidency, the Twelve, and others in this city, for nearly two years, almost without fee or reward. Elder Watt now proposes to publish a Journal of these Reports, in England, for the benefit of the Saints at large, and to obtain means to enable him to sustain his highly useful position of Reporter. You will perceive at once that this will be a work of mutual benefit, and we cheerfully and warmly request your co-operation in the purchase and sale of the above-named Journal, and wish all the profits arising therefrom to be under the control of Elder Watt.
BRIGHAM YOUNG,
HEBER C. KIMBALL
WILLARD RICHARDS,
First Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Further, Joseph Smith disagrees with your opinion of the JOURNAL OF DISCOURSES:
"We feel confident that the important instructions on principle and doctrine therein contained, relative to the building of Temples, the salvation of the dead, the introduction of the Order of Enoch, and the general progress and development of the great Latter-day Work, will prove as interesting, gratifying and beneficial to the Saints and to posterity, as those that have been previously published through this medium. "We regret that the circulation of the JOURNAL OF DISCOURSES is so limited. Its importance would warrant a thousand-fold greater extension of this work. We anticipate a time, not distant in the future, when a copy of the present volume will be more precious than gold. It is even now almost impossible to obtain a complete series. Copies should therefore be carefully preserved by all subscribers."
(Journal of Discourses Preface. Vol.18)
------------
So, the JoD was written/spoken by the Mormon leaders, endorsed by the Mormon leaders, and it's publications was as a tresult of actions by the Mormon leaders, yet you tell me that it was not a Mormon Church publication.
Methinks that you are arguing a technicality, one that makes no difference to the fact that probably no document better documenst the doctrine which was taught by the Mormon church.