Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I wonder what happened to the left. During the Bush2 admin they were screaming for indictments over a self outed CIA operative.
I just don't see how you can say this after the WMD fiasco and Abu Grhraib.If Hillary was a Republican she'd be in jail as we speak. She could never win let alone run for president. The press would hound her down to a shred.
I just don't see how you can say this after the WMD fiasco and Abu Grhraib.
Ahhh! the old "Wont try and rebut the article just attack the person writing it" or as it's called the old "ad hominem fallacy" second only to the "no true Scotsman fallacy" for popularity in CF threads.Ahh yes John Dean he was going to be the patsy for the Watergate Scandal and ended up selling his soul to stay out of jail even though he should have went, no wonder he's so far in the tank for his saviors...
https://verdict.justia.com/author/dean
In her interview with the FBI, she tried to pin it (using a private server) on Colin Powell. That didn't work. Powell wasn't going to let that stand and is now on record exposing yet another like of Hillary. http://www.people.com/article/colin-powell-hillary-clinton-pinning-email-scandal-on-him
attack
Always glad you make your day Uncle Siggy.
Sorry I couldn't help myself, really you should know better than that...
Thats' assuming Putin has stopped laughing from the last red button encounter.....All she really needs with him is a new red button and a bottle of Cognac.
Well, if you don't have any evidence to support hrc just change the subject.....Exactly. That's why they want to keep the focus on Trump. If they want to discuss Trump, they should do so in a thread about Trump. This is about Hillary's emails and yet here we people who insist on discussing Trump. lol
She has already come out against TPP but that was after she was for it......and help negotiate it....so if elected will she be for it again?I think that Hillary problems could easily erode Obama's legacy and new revelations are likely to come forth before the election. I can't imagine Obama hanging in to support one hammering his legacy.
I think there is a chance it would be like the 2000 dem campaign. Gore was running and Clinton was president. To my recollection Clinton was no real help to Gore that time around
Now that is a funny statement in the context of supporting hrc....Let's be honest here,
I have not given up quite yet......15 or 20 years ago, I would jump in my suit of armor, grab my lance and shield, get on top of my Trusty steed and join you in a magnificent charge towards the Giants that may or may not be windmills...
But I've fought and lost too many of those battles, and am now a crusty old cynic.
I am of the firm belief that the current political system/structure is doomed. But that is another rant for another time...
Nothing, it is the progressive leftist stawman. If you got nothing nice to say about hrc through out a strawman.What has that got to do with Hillary's mishandling of classified material?
Wow...so you agree and he's right on the money that if those people weren't Congressmen they would be indicted for slandering Sec. Clinton. Sweet!Reminiscing about someone's past is an attack? Especially a guy that is famous for trying to cover up criminal activity and failing miserably... (Some people will do anything for a little money... tsk...tsk...tsk...)
WoW!!!!!!!!!you spun that so hard I am still dizzy.Wow...so you agree and he's right on the money that if those people weren't Congressmen they would be indicted for slandering Sec. Clinton. Sweet!
tulc(is surprised but pleased to be on the same side as Uncle Siggy)
She has already come out against TPP but that was after she was for it......and help negotiate it....so if elected will she be for it again?
huh. Since you were very clear you weren't using his record to attack him with and you made no effort to refute anything he said in the article the only conclusion I could draw was you must agree with him.WoW!!!!!!!!!you spun that so hard I am still dizzy.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/22/fbi-found-14000-new-hillary-clinton-emails/
How is it possible to believe this woman. She claimed over and over again that she turned over all her emails and now they've found yet 15,000 more. That's a lot of emails to sort through.
"The FBI said the 14,900 emails on disk one were either sent or received by Mrs. Clinton and are not duplicative of the approximately 30,000 emails she turned over and that the State Department already released, under a judge’s order."
Not duplicative or previous email releases. So after a judge ordered her to release all her emails, she deliberately kept back thousands. And this dishonest woman will likely be the president. She'll be able to control and hid things she doesn't want the public to see.
My guess is there are more emails to come.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?