Focus, dad. Please try and keep up. Look back a few posts if you need to.
	
	
		
		
			Show me where the waves were predicted to do squat, when they first went down?? You don't think it was a surprise to find out that the outer core area behaves like a liquid? Etc? Be honest.
		
		
	 
Utterly irrelevant. The 
model of a liquid core 
predicts that no shear waves will penetrate. That's because shear waves can't propagate through liquid due to its runniness. Your 
model is not "a certain kind of S/P material" where we know how that kind of stuff behaves. it is "S/P material which doesn't let shear waves through."
See the difference?
- A liquid
 
- An unknown material which doesn't let shear waves through.
 
Which is a 
better explanation?
	
	
		
		
			Such as??? Since you know so little about it, what makes you think anything is correct? Modelling comes before we saw which way the waves wiggled, not some PO effort to fit the evidence after the fact.
		
		
	 
Wrong wrong and wrong. Come back when you understand how science works. You can't build a model if you don't have any data.
It just so happens that this rather parsimonious model (a liquid core) explains the data well.
	
	
		
		
			You can conclude you really had it wrong, and God was right, as always, it is eternal.
		
		
	 
About the 
data dad. This is how science is done. You look at the data, then you make a model that 
fits with the data. 
Then and this is crucial - you pretend you didn't have the data, and you see whether, with 
just your model you'd be able to work out what the data 
would be.
Guess what - if you say that "the earth is made out of S/P material" then you 
can't work out that there would be a shadow zone.
That's why the liquid core theory is better - that's why you're wrong.
	
	
		
		
			True, you have no clue. Even with the stuff you think you know a bit about, the physical, you admit to flying blind as a bat!
		
		
	 
I have never admitted any such thing and you know it. (That makes you a liar, by the way.) We know exactly how physical stuff reacts to stress, strain, shearing and pressure. For example, you can shear a liquid without problem. That's why shear waves don't pass through it.
How does spiritual stuff react to these forces, dad?
	
	
		
		
			Test what? Science that is not limited to the PO? Well, first you need to come up with some, then I'll test it! Meanwhile, you are no authority on things spiritual.
		
		
	 
You've given us no way of testing what you say, so you're almost certainly wrong.
	
	
		
		
			So, looking at the waves going through the earth, they simply bend afew times. What is it you can tell us about that? Show us the material it has to be.
		
		
	 
Has to be? It doesn't 
have to be anything! It could be lots of little goblins all holding hands! But it 
isn't because that's a 
ridiculous, made up fantasy!
Now, tell me how you can show me that it is ridiculous, and you'll have told me how I can show you that your belief is ridiculous.
	
	
		
		
			No, one does not lose for not knowing the precise properties of angels. At least I have some clues. You have no clue. Some winner!
		
		
	 
Wrong. If you don't know the properties of what you claim the earth is made of, then you're stuck with good old physical science.