Moon Theories

[AV1611VET]

What will you say when these are eventually paired down to one or two? Will you just stop mentioning the moon in this forum?

I'll cross that bridge when I come to it.

 

[TLK Valentine]

The point is that the formation of the moon, the earth, the sun, the lacking fossil record, abiogenesis, etc. are all a mystery for scientists because they are looking for natural explanations that do not fit the evidence but are unwilling to admit the idea that it was all created by an ID.

Are you saying that an ID (very telling that you can't even bring yourself to say it) should be an additional hypothesis? Does adding one more to the mix improve matters? If so, how?

 

[TLK Valentine]

I'll cross that bridge when I come to it.

You mean when people who work on it come to it.

 

[biggles53]

You mean when people who work on it come to it.

Let me get this straight...

He's disparaging science for.........doing EXACTLY what science is supposed to do....!?

Like I said in another thread.....no fool like an old fool......

 

[TLK Valentine]

Let me get this straight...

He's disparaging science for.........doing EXACTLY what science is supposed to do....!?

Pretty much -- those who can't/won't are usually resentful of those who do.

 

[AV1611VET]

Pretty much -- those who can't/won't are usually resentful of those who do.

Do you know anyone like that?

 

[crjmurray]

Lotta moon interest here lately.

 

[selfinflikted]

"lately"

 

[crjmurray]

"lately"

Perhaps I'm using that a bit loosely.

 

[Split Rock]

I believe the moon has been replaced by a hologram created by the Federal Conspiracy Agency of the USA. The Truth Is Out There!!!!!

 

[selfinflikted]

Perhaps I'm using that a bit loosely.

It isn't rare for AV to resurrect a thread that's only a few months old or several years old. When I see a thread I hadn't noticed before, and AV was the last to post in it, I always check the time stamps. Which, by the way, seem to have changed from yesterday giving hours/days ago instead of an actual time stamp. WHY?

 

[AV1611VET]

It isn't rare for AV to resurrect a thread that's only a few months old or several years old. When I see a thread I hadn't noticed before, and AV was the last to post in it, I always check the time stamps. Which, by the way, seem to have changed from yesterday giving hours/days ago instead of an actual time stamp. WHY?

It looks like CF is changing formats.

You can also post more than 1003 posts in a thread now, without the thread automatically closing.

The "actual" time stamps start back up after 4 weeks.

 

[selfinflikted]

It looks like CF is changing formats.

You can also post more than 1003 posts in a thread now, without the thread automatically closing.

The "actual" time stamps start back up after 4 weeks.

Wonder why they changed that? I liked being able to see time stamps.

 

[AV1611VET]

Wonder why they changed that? I liked being able to see time stamps.

You can still see them.

You just have to wait four weeks.

Ba-dum-tissss!

 

[selfinflikted]

Oh, you.