Moon light - the word of God vs falsely so called science

[Ophiolite]

Most scientist are just stooges, to be allowed in the group they just follow directions and do the task they are given. Non of this stuff they say is happening can not be modeled it is just basically numbers on paper.

But people have always been a fool for the person who makes the loudest and most confident statements, they usually do not require that they are accompanied with truth.

Despite reading some bizarre statements in the forum over the years I can still be taken aback by the profound ignorance about one or other topic that can exist in the minds of some of its members. Your characterisation of scientists is wrong in just about every particular and every generality. I suppose if I valued your opinion I would be offended by it.

However, as a stooge, I mean scientist, I have an open mind. What evidence do you have that any of your assertions are anything other than empty rhetoric?

 

[Radagast]

But yet you and other christians who accept science over the Bible insist that the sun reflects the suns light.

That is indeed the physical mechanism by which the moon lights up the night.

Nothing contradictory to the Bible in that fact.

Most scientist are just stooges

Speaking as a scientist who's a Christian, I don't appreciate the abuse.

 

[Kylie]

Your first statement shows you know nothing about what your are talking about. I never mentioned any reference to a website called aplanetruth

It's a website I came across in my research, literally the second result you get when you Google his name. I'll admit that I only had a quick look, and I thought that it was a website based on his work.

In any case, you have not supported your claim. You just claimed he proved it, yet you gave no source to back it up, no titles of books or websites where his arguments are laid out.

You then failed to respond to every other point I raised. It's a typical tactic or creationists, I've found, to ignore the stuff that they can't deal with and hope that the discussion will become sidetracked and the ignored points will become forgotten. I'm not going to.

So here are those points again, so you may respond to them.

What qualifications do you have that qualify you to speak with authority on the things you claim to have seen?

And you speak of a 200x zoom? Well let's see...

The widest lens I could find is a 6mm ultra fisheye lens. https://www.thephoblographer.com/20...g-around-why-not-invest-it-in-a-fisheye-lens/

the longest lens I could find is a 5200mm monster from Canon. 9 Unbelievable Camera Lenses That Actually Exist

By my calculations, that's the equivalent of 866x zoom.

Wait - you DID know that the times zoom doesn't actually refer to the maximum magnification the camera can get, but is rather a measure of how much longer the lens is when fully zoomed in compared to when it is zoomed out, right? Because if you really were qualified to speak about what you've seen with your camera, you'd certainly know that!

For instance, if the widest a camera can zoom out is 17mm, and the furthest it can zoom is 55mm, that's a 3.2x zoom, and is quite a common range for the basic lenses you get with an entry-level SLR camera. If you have a lens that is 70mm to 200mm, that's a 2.8x zoom, very similar in terms of how much zoom, but because the focal lengths are different, they give very different looking photos.

But with you being so skilled in photography that you can tell that the "impressions" are emitting light (whatever that actually means), I'm sure you knew all this, and your obvious error in basic photographic theory was just a test to see if I knew what I was talking about. Isn't that right?

 

[Radagast]

But with you being so skilled in photography that you can tell that the "impressions" are emitting light (whatever that actually means)

I think he meant the fact that the moon is not lit uniformly: there are visible "bright spots" on the moon (e.g. here). Close-up views show that these are mostly crater walls, angled so as to reflect the sunlight more directly.

 

[Kylie]

I think he meant the fact that the moon is not lit uniformly: there are visible "bright spots" on the moon (e.g. here). Close-up views show that these are mostly crater walls, angled so as to reflect the sunlight more directly.

They're still not emitting light...

 

[Radagast]

They're still not emitting light...

The moon lights up the night sky, but it does so by means of reflection.

Satisfied?

 

[Lost4words]

How can anyone claim the moon has its own light source? Are they living in the stone age?!

 

[Kylie]

The moon lights up the night sky, but it does so by means of reflection.

Satisfied?

Yes, I'd agree that this is accurate. But we can't assume that's what d taylor meant...

 

[Radagast]

Yes, I'd agree that this is accurate. But we can't assume that's what d taylor meant...

I'm pretty sure it isn't. It's just what *I* meant.

I apologise if I've muddied the waters by expressing my own opinion and trying to clarify his.

 

[Astrophile]

Unnecessary post.

 

[d taylor]

Notice the re-indoctrination is in full swing about the fake moon trip in the 60's a lot of media and tv celebrating the 1960's lie . Hoping to keep another generation believing the lies of Governments, science.

They better create better fakes than this one from china

Chinese Chang'e-4 Satellite Nabs Stunning Moon-Earth Shot

 

[Jimmy D]

Notice the re-indoctrination is in full swing about the fake moon trip in the 60's a lot of media and tv celebrating the 1960's lie . Hoping to keep another generation believing the lies of Governments, science.

They better create better fakes than this one from china

Chief! Hold the front page! An internet conspiracist thinks that the moon landings were fake!!!

 

[Ophiolite]

Chief! Hold the front page! An internet conspiracist thinks that the moon landings were fake!!!

One small step for man, one giant leap for a continuity editor.

 

[d taylor]

The moon and its light recording.
The very left (moving right) little point of light shinning from the surface or from under the surface of the moon.

 

[Lost4words]

The moon and its light recording.
The very left (moving right) little point of light shinning from the surface or from under the surface of the moon.

Photoshop is truly amazing!

 

[Kylie]

Notice the re-indoctrination is in full swing about the fake moon trip in the 60's a lot of media and tv celebrating the 1960's lie . Hoping to keep another generation believing the lies of Governments, science.

They better create better fakes than this one from china

View attachment 259615

Chinese Chang'e-4 Satellite Nabs Stunning Moon-Earth Shot

Wow, are you serious?

 

[Ophiolite]

Unnecessary post.

No names, no pack drill, but it was a lot more interesting and informative than some of the posts on this thread.

 

[Kate30]

Unnecessary post.

 

[Radagast]

View attachment 259641

Not quite.

The US did indeed give moon rocks to the Netherlands. That isn't one of them.

The petrified wood was a personal gift from United States Ambassador J. William Middendorf II to Prime Minister Willem Drees, given well before NASA ever distributed moon rocks. It was also loose, not in a NASA display. It eventually found its way into a museum with a "moon rock" label, but that was a misunderstanding.

Brief recap: in the image, the phrases "we gave," "Holland", and "Moon rock" are all incorrect. Basically, it's a lie.

 

[d taylor]

Wow, are you serious?

Yes, Its kind of like a magician, they pull off the illusion one time, but know to not try it again or they may be found out.
So instead of in the last fifty years going back to the moon. They do other projects etc... and just celebrate their illusion, to drag along another group into the future.

It will be interesting in the up and coming years what will the side distractions be. I hope it is better than an elon musk car in space, but when you have people hooked it does not take much.

Men and their ego, if anyone has went close to the moon. They would by now, have placed a camera on the moon to record the earth in motion. Showing actual recorded video of the rotating water ball floating in space.
To show actual video of that would be absolutely irresistible to the male ego.

This is funny at 1:03 there is this car and behind it is a big round image of earth that someone is pulling across the floor to give the illusion of movement. The jerking action of the earth moving is funny, it's like the person could not pull the earth smoothly across the floor.