- Feb 11, 2018
- 1,912
- 1,242
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Constitution
And what about that time Jesus was angry because people were selling things in the temple?
Ok? I'm not sure that 'youtube' is comparable with 'my father's house'. If you get my drift. I don't think people go to youtube to pray.
Even then, I'm not even sure it was that he was mad at them for selling stuff.
For example, I don't see that he was particularly angry at them selling birds or sheep for sacrificial purposes.
The specific phrase he used was "You turned my father's house into a den of thieves", and the people whose tables he turned over, were the money changers.
What we know is that the religious leaders, and the money changers, were conspiring together to rip off the people. They were using the old testament laws of giving a shekel, to say that people could not give the common currency that they were paid under the Roman empire. So in order for a jew to follow their faith, they had to exchange their denarious for shekels.
Knowing they had no choice but to exchange their money, the priests and money changers worked together to over charge the people. Essentially charging 20 dollars for 1 dollars worth of shekels, if you get my meaning.
So Jesus meant very specifically that they had turned the temple into a den of thieves.
My understanding is that this is what Jesus was angry about, and rightly so.
I don't think that if they were not thieving, that he would have been angry.
Now I'll be first to admit that this is my own take, and that no doubt different churches have their own views. Everyone should follow the views of the Christian community they are in. But I don't think there is any broad prohibition outlined by that one single passage in the Bible.
And certainly this has nothing to do with youtube.
Upvote
0