• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Moderate Fundamentalism?

9Rock9

Sinner in need of grace.
Nov 28, 2018
296
192
South Carolina
✟97,766.00
Country
United States
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I know this sounds oxymoronic, but I wonder if there is such a thing as moderate fundamentalis'?

I sometimes wonder whether I'm a fundamentalist.

I'm a firm believer in the inerrancy of Scripture, and hold to a lot of conservative views on theology, society and sexuality. I also lean premillennial in my eschatology.

I think only men should be pastors. While my denomination technically affirms this, the majority of lay members think women should be allowed as pastors.

However, I never bought concepts like Landmarkism nor KJV-Onlyism.

While I would consider many of my convictions to fall into the fundamentalist camp, but I strive to have a charitable and moderate attitude.

Is there anyone else here who is like this?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vambram

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
7,711
5,626
60
Saint James, Missouri
✟356,922.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I was born-again in a fundamentalist independent Baptist church in 1978. At one time, I did believe that the KJV was the only good English translation blessed by the Lord. Also, I was taught Landmarkism at Tennessee Temple University in Chattanooga, Tn. However, I am no longer certain that this concept is absolutely valid. Nevertheless, I do believe that only men should be pastors. Also, I do believe in the inerrancy of the original manuscripts of the Scriptures. I believe in a pre-tribulation Rapture of the Church and the pre-millennial return of the Lord Jesus Christ at His Second Coming. I still hold to conservative views of sexuality, society, and theology.
 
Upvote 0

timf

Regular Member
Jun 12, 2011
1,418
571
✟125,860.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Here is an article from christianpioneer.com blog archive that describes a potential risk in fundamentalism if taken too far.

Bunker Christianity

There have been historical times of opposition and even persecution where Christians have responded defensively. The term “fundamentalism” comes from a series of booklets called the Fundamentals written 100 years ago in response to the rising tide of secularism seen with Darwin, Freud, and Marx enthusiastically taken up in colleges as an alternative to Christianity.

Hymns like “Onward Christian Soldiers” often resonate with a desire for a militant engagement with the world that can foster either a defensive ossification or alternatively a prideful bellicosity. However, Christians are rather called to be prepared to give a reason for the hope that is within them.

Christians under siege can react to perceived threat with fear and anger which weakens faith in their Savior and a strengthens of faith in themselves (the flesh). This usually happens when walking in truth and humility seems uncertain and being “right” seems a more concrete position. Being “right” usually means adherence to doctrines, rituals, traditions, and practices of men. Walking in truth usually means a humble surrender to the work of the Holy Spirit and unreserved trust in Jesus.

Being “right” may manifest in creeds, organizational systems, crusades, seminaries, and even inquisitions. Walking in truth often seems to engender a passivity that may lead anywhere from being ignored to being burned alive. Adversity usually exposes the limitations of being “right”. A person may cling to a particular bible translation, an achievement such as having made Jesus Lord of his life or baptism, a tradition such as generations of denominational faithfulness, or faithful adherence to a practice such as Sabbath or dietary observances, however, ultimately being “right" elevates self and walking in truth brings us closer to him who is truth.

Christians who have sought the comfort of security in a defensive position often find themselves contending with other Christians over various elements of doctrine, bible versions, prayer formats, color of choir robes, or any deviation from what has been defined as “right”. Often sermons from this vantage point carry the theme of how bad everyone else is and how good we are.

Christianity was always intended to be transcendent to the world, not promoting it, entangled with it, or in the case of “bunker" Christianity even sniping at it. There is a book hundreds of years old called, “The Practice of the Presence of God” by a Brother Lawrence. Brother Lawrence could not often be called “right”, but what he shows is a simple and complete faith in God. In a way, his various errors are useful in demonstrating by contrast how little faith depends on intellectual achievement, meticulous practice, or getting things exactly “right”.

Satan has always had success getting humans to try to take control of things. When driven into a defensive posture, we often become vulnerable to this temptation by thinking we are contending for the faith by attacking other Christians or fighting their error. Christians are called to exhort, encourage, even admonish but most of all to love other Christians. When under attack or even put to death, our God is not so weak as to need us to fight the world or each other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

LW97Nils

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2023
402
84
28
Germany's sin city - Munich
✟39,983.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I was born-again in a fundamentalist independent Baptist church in 1978. At one time, I did believe that the KJV was the only good English translation blessed by the Lord. Also, I was taught Landmarkism at Tennessee Temple University in Chattanooga, Tn. However, I am no longer certain that this concept is absolutely valid. Nevertheless, I do believe that only men should be pastors. Also, I do believe in the inerrancy of the original manuscripts of the Scriptures. I believe in a pre-tribulation Rapture of the Church and the pre-millennial return of the Lord Jesus Christ at His Second Coming. I still hold to conservative views of sexuality, society, and theology.
I would in agreement, minus the pre trib rapture.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

FAITH-IN-HIM

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2024
1,909
1,297
WI
✟52,458.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I know this sounds oxymoronic, but I wonder if there is such a thing as moderate fundamentalis'?

I sometimes wonder whether I'm a fundamentalist.

I'm a firm believer in the inerrancy of Scripture, and hold to a lot of conservative views on theology, society and sexuality. I also lean premillennial in my eschatology.

I think only men should be pastors. While my denomination technically affirms this, the majority of lay members think women should be allowed as pastors.

However, I never bought concepts like Landmarkism nor KJV-Onlyism.

While I would consider many of my convictions to fall into the fundamentalist camp, but I strive to have a charitable and moderate attitude.

Is there anyone else here who is like this?

I grew up in a fundamental Baptist church, but over time I adopted “Five Point Calvinism” and no longer believe in the "free will" teaching of Fundamentalists. I prefer reading the Bible in KJV but do not believe any translation is divinely ordained.
 
Upvote 0