Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Heck, not only are you right, you haven't even stated a position here. Can you prove that evolving was the same in the past, yea or nay? The answer is...nay. Nothing else matters here.Seems like I was right.
Heck, not only are you right, you haven't even stated a position here. Can you prove that evolving was the same in the past, yea or nay? The answer is...nay. Nothing else matters here.
Heck, not only are you right, you haven't even stated a position here. Can you prove that evolving was the same in the past, yea or nay? The answer is...nay. Nothing else matters here.
Nope. You do not know what you are talking about. Illustrate for us here where I went wrong...Lurkers, well...you know
Well, some may be surprised.
"A fossil that was celebrated last year as a possible "missing link" between humans and early primates is actually a forebearer of modern-day lemurs and lorises, according to two papers by scientists at The University of Texas at Austin, Duke University and the University of Chicago."
'Missing link' fossil was not human ancestor as claimed, anthropologists say
Ho hum. Kids, Isn't it time to not believe a lying word these dreamers say to begin with?
you got that right. Thanks for starting this thread.
Tweedleydee and tweedlydum, more like it. Of course a house divided against itself cannot stand. But it's fun watching them shoot each other in the foot.
No reason in science, no, they are deaf dumb and blind to anything but the present. Of course the bible and history are fantastic reasons to accept the obvious, that the past was sure not like now. Also...remember, If there's no reason (i.e. evidence) to indicate that laws were the same, there's no reason to assume they were
One can assume any state, including a same state and the same thing applies. So science is gutted. Useless in this matter. Yet it assumes a certain state, and fabricates all thing from there.
Science is supposed to be something more than that. To be reduced to faith based arguments for it, is a death knell. Not for bible believers.
Nope. It was to highlight a claim made that a fossil was a missing link with man. Now they are exposed as wrong.
Please tell us your definition of "Lie," then brinny. Because mine doesn't seem to fit the O.P. Also, you do realize all the scientists who are critisizing the conclusions of those who found and identified Ida still view it as a missing link, just not one leading to humans... right?
I accept that evolution happened in spades, in a different state past, and was a created trait. The only real issue I have with 'evolution' is godless evolution over long ages, that has no known starting point, and is a complete satanic fabrication.
Is that why the "doubter" lists all have the same names on them that never change over time?
Really? Since I don't, I guess that must mean you are the one embrasing a lie. Correct?
You claim you used to be a science researcher. May I ask what research you took part in?
you got that right. Thanks for starting this thread.
sorry, but dad's got all o' ya's beat
Perhaps you can help explain the reasoning then, as dad has been unable to.
1.Why does a disagreement mean that everyone is wrong?
2.Scientists in all fields disagree all the time. Does that mean all of science is wrong?
3.Does being wrong mean one is lying?
Peter
Sure is, but it is self-correcting. Mistakes are identified and corrected. Now compare that to creationism. How do creationists recognize when their interpretation of scripture is wrong? How do they determine if what they think scripture says does or doesn't apply to biology or geology, etc.?science sounds a bit fallible, doesn't it?
If that is the case (and I agree with you) why did you claim the O.P. was correct?Lying is deliberate, Being mistaken is not.
Sure is, but it is self-correcting. Mistakes are identified and corrected. Now compare that to creationism. How do creationists recognize when their interpretation of scripture is wrong? How do they determine if what they think scripture says does or doesn't apply to biology or geology, etc.?
If that is the case (and I agree with you) why did you claim the O.P. was correct?
science sounds a bit fallible, doesn't it?
Lying is deliberate, Being mistaken is not.
I believe that God the Creator, created heaven and earth. I believe that He is infinite. I am not. Science is stumbling along, attempting to understand His creation...and has an "Oops!" factor that is quite amusing.
Science epitomizes how flawed man is, even as he thinks he "knows sumthin' fer sher" but then the error of that assumption flies in his face later.
I agree with the OP.
Thanks, always nice to get a compliment from a voice of reason..you got that right. Thanks for starting this thread.
Thanks, always nice to get a compliment from a voice of reason..
Let me sharpen your thinking, here, and get some focus here. We are looking at how so called science does not understand evolution or the way life worked in the far past, when most evolving happened. You seem focused on how it now works, which is irrelevant. Meaningless. ..Unless the past was in the same state with the same laws. However, science can not prove that, in the least. It does not know. You will have to deal with that fact. No choice.dad:
You've missed my point, unsurprisingly.
You don't understand evolution. You've proved it. This means you're not qualified to criticise it. Therefore anything you have to say on the subject is worthless.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?