Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Although you reacted on my posting, you didn't answer the questions.Very well, I will focus on this one:
How does the fossil record support rapid evolution?
How do you make the difference between your alleged rapid evolution, and the conventional view on evolution?
The real question is, 'why would I need to'?? How do you force the evidence into a present state origin? How would you know what state the world was in when the creatures died? Let's stick to what is KNOWN. We know that they died. We also see some divergence. Created kinds as the starting point, fits the bill something fierce there!
It is very well defensible. I gave in this thread a few facts that point in that direction.It is not my allegation that science rests on the premise that the laws and nature were the same. Really. It is their point, and yours if you defend them. It is indefensible.
Hey, guess what, those aren't stromatolites. Dad fails at science again, what a surprise.Woah. Let's look at some modern ones living today. Seems like the experts are less certain than you..
"But its not just their varied shapes that makes them so interesting. Its the fact that no one knows how they formed...
Cyanobacteria in other locations are famous for building a variety of structures, from thick rubbery mats to layered dome-like structures known as stromatolites, which are thought to have been the dominant form of life on early Earth. Today, though, they are rare, existing only in extreme environments.
Chris McKay of NASA Ames Research Center. McKay was one of the first scientists to scuba dive in Pavilion Lake. When you look at structures like this, the standard hypothesis is that organisms are playing a role in creating them. But we havent proven that here.
Looking for Life on Mars â in a Canadian Lake
"Vague balderdash."Only in the twisted imagination of godless so called science devotees. In actual fact, nothing is connected to an unproven same state past. The only connection is imaginary.
That's not what I said. Stop playing dumb.I agree. Science is firmly stuck in the present.
The evidence concerning pillow lava has been presented to you over and over. I'm not going to play your game and repeat it here.So, is there any pillow lava from pre flood? If so, where is it? Let's check the atomic structure, and microscopic details. You make the claim, you support it.
Woah. Let's look at some modern ones living today. Seems like the experts are less certain than you..
Why, because dad, "God's Little Echo," says so? Are you a geologist?No. You may know how they now form.
It is an ad hoc way of reconciling your narrow-minded interpretation of scripture with reality. There was a time when you virtually admitted this. Now you are so full of yourself that you no longer can.Vague balderdash. The different state past is a way of seeing how the bible was right, and where science gets off.
Again, you claim "we." Who Is "We?" All you are doing is cutting and pasting from science , just as you do with scripture. The result is a merged mass of mishmass.Commentators have different opinions. It is not something that was black and white, and understood fully. With the newer evidence of science, such as the continental separation, combined with the info on the past in history and the bible, we can add a little depth to our former comprehension of that event.
I only want you to take your rightful place among the other great prophets of God... Moses and John the Baptist. You know that's what you want, why so you pretend differently?You are starting to sound obsessive.
You make the claim, you support it.
There is no way that the fossil evidence suggests slow evolving, that I am aware of. So looking at a biblical speed is not new! YOU suggest there is scientific and material evidence it was slow. Pony up. I don't believe you.Although you reacted on my posting, you didn't answer the questions.
But, to answer your question: you put forward "rapid" evolution, against the scientific and against the material evidence. It is thus up to you to prove your point right. You are introducing a new concept - you have tp proof your point.
So now I would appreciate it, if you answered the questions here above.
Says you. On what basis, and using what criteria are they the closest? Pony up.The hyrax is the elephant's closest relative. But they don't look like each other;
how is it possible!?!
Evolution. The missing link of course doesn't look like a human; they're separated by millions of years of change and evolution.
Well, they are made of the stuff that they are made of..no? Guess what, if you can't pony up for stuff here and now, where does that leave your credibility for biliions of imaniry years ago!!? Pony up.Hey, guess what, those aren't stromatolites. Dad fails at science again, what a surprise.
Hey, history and the bible back me up. What you got for a same state past? Nothing! Nothing points in the direction of a present state in the future or far past. Really. You are dreaming in technicolor. That's why you can't pony up.It is very well defensible. I gave in this thread a few facts that point in that direction.
But above all, you introduces the notion that "fabric ofthe Universe " was different. It is up to you to back that claim.
No, I could not be wrong on that, count on it. Men gave their lives, and were tortured, and all sorts of things defending that truth. It ain't up for grabs, or negotiable. It is absolute.Dad
Im sure you just missed it.
Mind answering that one? Im just interested in your answer.
As the above post said, hell no.How about a straight answer? Could you be wrong in thinking that the Bible is the word of God?
I wonder how many times you could reply and just pretend that I never asked, or answer a different question.
Men have given their lives for many different concepts over time. Does that make them all right? Were the 911 terrorists right because they gave their lives? While I realize the initial question was whether the Bible is God's Word, the more important question is: Does any of this have any bearing at all on whether your interpretation of scripture is correct?No, I could not be wrong on that, count on it. Men gave their lives, and were tortured, and all sorts of things defending that truth. It ain't up for grabs, or negotiable. It is absolute.
Splt rock, I will answer your posts, but am having computer problems for a few days, so might be delayed....I prefer to reply to you on my own laptop..as it could require concentrating for a minute or two..
Lizards are made of bones and meat. Are they mammals? No. These are calcitic cyanobacterial structures, but they are not stromatolites. Your fail continues. If you think these are the same as stromatolies, guess what, if you can't pony up for stuff here and now, where does that leave your credibility for multiples of imaniry states!!? Pony up.Well, they are made of the stuff that they are made of..no? Guess what, if you can't pony up for stuff here and now, where does that leave your credibility for biliions of imaniry years ago!!? Pony up.
Claiming that "slow evolution" is unproven, is in no way a proof for rapid evolution.There is no way that the fossil evidence suggests slow evolving, that I am aware of. So looking at a biblical speed is not new! YOU suggest there is scientific and material evidence it was slow. Pony up. I don't believe you.
Not answering the question, that is.Hey, history and the bible back me up. What you got for a same state past? Nothing! Nothing points in the direction of a present state in the future or far past. Really. You are dreaming in technicolor. That's why you can't pony up.But above all, you introduces the notion that "fabric ofthe Universe " was different. It is up to you to back that claim
So, the fact that men gave their lifes makes it true?No, I could not be wrong on that, count on it. Men gave their lives, and were tortured, and all sorts of things defending that truth. It ain't up for grabs, or negotiable. It is absolute.
Says you.
On what basis, and using what criteria are they the closest? Pony up.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?