• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Missing Energy in Creation: A New Theory

Status
Not open for further replies.

busterdog

Senior Veteran
Jun 20, 2006
3,359
183
Visit site
✟26,929.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The massive amount of energy necessary for creation is missing from the record and most theories. Gravity was not sufficient. Here is another theory. I am not advocating, except for the backhanded swipe at the nebular hypothesis.

Plasma works for me -- all I want is a model. Alleged proof is for morons. We are just talking about models.

"You rattle my brain ...."

YouTube - Jerry Lee Lewis - Great Balls Of Fire

Did great balls of fire form the planets? - space - 20 July 2009 - New Scientist


Free associating:

YouTube - Monty Python Communist Quiz sketch

Great balls of fire.
 

philadiddle

Drumming circles around you
Dec 23, 2004
3,719
56
44
Canada
Visit site
✟4,522.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Could you explain what point you are trying to make? I don't mean that question in a rude or rhetorical way. As I read your post you say that there is new evidence for a model that explains the formation of our solar system, but then you say you don't endorse it, so what are you getting at?
 
Upvote 0

busterdog

Senior Veteran
Jun 20, 2006
3,359
183
Visit site
✟26,929.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

The article finds that gravity can't explain the accretion of planetary bodies. It posits a highly energized form of matter - hot, radioactive matter -- as the building block of the planetary bodies. The extra energy necessary to make the planets had to occur in some form or another -- that's my thesis, or even speculation if you like. But, this particular theory agrees that there was a lot more energy involved, it just wouldnt agree with, say, energy in the form of electromagnetism energizing plasma.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.