"Microevolution"

[Tiberius]

you knbow what is funny about the pixel black to white analogy?

They are still pixels lol

A hairless canine is still a canine, and will never give birth to a non canine

a black woman and white woman are both homosapiens-sapiens, and will give birth to such

You missed the point entirely. Each pixel is made of a red element, a green element and a blue element. It's kinda like the pixel version of DNA. In the black to white example, the elements changed. Sure, they're still pixels, but that is irrelevant to the demosntration of how evolution works. Your argument is like saying that humans and bacteria are the same because they use the same amino acids in their DNA.

 

[Tiberius]

Sure:
SOURCE

Is that DNA something that is passed on when cars reproduce?

 

[knowledgeIsPower]

you knbow what is funny about the pixel black to white analogy?

They are still pixels lol

A hairless canine is still a canine, and will never give birth to a non canine

a black woman and white woman are both homosapiens-sapiens, and will give birth to such

So you consider "canine" to be a "kind" then?

 

[knowledgeIsPower]

Sure:
SOURCE

No no give me the nucleotide sequence and it's mode of passing that sequence of nucleotides onto the next generation. Not just some vague characteristics. You know perfectly well what I mean when I Say DNA so stop being purposefully dishonest Jesus would not approve.

If you can't do that admit that the comparison is erroneous.

 

[USincognito]

you knbow what is funny about the pixel black to white analogy?

They are still pixels lol

A hairless canine is still a canine, and will never give birth to a non canine

a black woman and white woman are both homosapiens-sapiens, and will give birth to such

And canines will never stop being Caniformae. Caniformae will never stop being Carnivora. Carnivora will never stop being Mammalia. Mammalia will never stop being Eutheria. Eutheria will never stop being Sarcopterygii. Sarcopterygii will never stop being Vertebrata.

Need I explain this further?

 

[AV1611VET]

Is that DNA something that is passed on when cars reproduce?

I think they're called 'blueprints' or 'templates' or something.

 

[AV1611VET]

No no give me the nucleotide sequence and it's mode of passing that sequence of nucleotides onto the next generation.

When the sun's and moon's gravitational pulls are at right angles to each other, the net difference in the pull on the fan belts are at their lowest, producing the least amount of gravitational interference.

Assuming maximum tuning, these tides can then reproduce r.p.m.s at maximum efficiency.

 

[knowledgeIsPower]

When the sun's and moon's gravitational pulls are at right angles to each other, the net difference in the pull on the fan belts are at their lowest, producing the least amount of gravitational interference.

Assuming maximum tuning, these tides can then reproduce r.p.m.s at maximum efficiency.

No no I clearly asked for the nucleotide sequence. Please provide it and stop posting irrelevant rubbish.

I want that as well as it's mechanism for passing that sequence on to it's offspring. If you cannot provide it isn't viable as a comparison to biological organisms undergoing evolution.

 

[AV1611VET]

No no I clearly asked for the nucleotide sequence. Please provide it and stop posting irrelevant rubbish.

-- Ah! My apologies!

I gave you neaptide, not nucleotide.

 

[Tiberius]

Do you act that way intentionally AV?

 

[Gracchus]

Do you act that way intentionally AV?

Some people think it amusing to make people angry, at least, when they can do so safely.

 

[knowledgeIsPower]

-- Ah! My apologies!

I gave you neaptide, not nucleotide.

No problem. I understand that when you can't answer something instead of admitting error you'll just post random rubbish. Pride is sometimes a terrible thing to witness.

 

[AV1611VET]

Do you act that way intentionally AV?

In this case, yes.

I warned him, didn't I?

QV the bottom line.

Will a picture do?

Do you know what this is?

(Note to lurkers: I might as well play his game and have fun with this.)

 

[knowledgeIsPower]

In this case, yes.

I warned him, didn't I?

QV the bottom line.

What did you warn me about?

That you attempt to derail when you don't have a real answer by posting irrelevant garbage instead of just acknowledging a perfectly valid point (seemingly because you are too proud to do so)?

I don't see that anywhere in your signature.

 

[AV1611VET]

Some people think it amusing to make people angry, at least, when they can do so safely.

I honestly don't think the guy is being sincere.

The [excellent] point was made that, comparing the fossil record together is like comparing a fan to a Formula-1 racing car.

There are so many gaps in the fossil record from cyanobacterium to man -- (I'd say in the quintillions) -- and a floor fan is also lacking enough r.p.m.s to accelerate a Formula-1 racing car.

But instead of answering the point, which is a simple comparison in numbers, he came back facetiously (in my opinion) by intermixing the two examples, so as to render the point inane.

I can play that game too -- only better.

 

[AV1611VET]

No problem. I understand that when you can't answer something instead of admitting error you'll just post random rubbish.

I'm not in the habit of 'admitting error' when I can't answer something, are you?

Ignorance ≠ Error

 

[AV1611VET]

That you attempt to derail when you don't have a real answer by posting irrelevant garbage instead of just acknowledging a perfectly valid point...

As the old saying goes: GIGO.

What's wrong? can't take your own medicine?

 

[Tomatoman]

I honestly don't think the guy is being sincere.

The [excellent] point was made that, comparing the fossil record together is like comparing a fan to a Formula-1 racing car.

There are so many gaps in the fossil record from cyanobacterium to man -- (I'd say in the quintillions) -- and a floor fan is also lacking enough r.p.m.s to accelerate a Formula-1 racing car.

But instead of answering the point, which is a simple comparison in numbers, he came back facetiously (in my opinion) by intermixing the two examples, so as to render the point inane.

I can play that game too -- only better.

Actually, we have something better than a complete fossil record (which would never actually convince you as you would claim it was put there by the devil to lure you from the path of righteousness). We have your DNA sequence and is written in every cell in your body... well, except red blood cells, but I expect red blood cells have something to do with the devil. Or perhaps red blood cells are divine because they don't show our evolutionary past and therefore blood is the only part of our bodies not contaminated by the devil. Who can say what you believe? Does it worry you, AV, that so much of what you believe is made up as you go along?

 

[AV1611VET]

Actually, we have something better than a complete fossil record...

I couldn't care less.

We aren't talking about DNA, we're talking about the fossil record.

And I'll say this a second time as well:

You (or anyone) would die of old age before you ever put the fossil record together.

A few years back, I asked if the fossil record was digital or analog, and got what I thought was an honest answer: analog.

62

 

[knowledgeIsPower]

As the old saying goes: GIGO.

What's wrong? can't take your own medicine?

Oh it isn't my own medicine. If anything I appreciate honesty. When the answer is apparent even if it shows your comparison to be flawed just suck it up and be honest. I find your prideful nature to be totally hypocritical when looked at alongside your claimed belief in Christianity.

Formula1 cars don't have DNA and they don't reproduce. Neither do fans. Instead of just saying this you post irrelevant garbage in a feeble attempt to deflect the issue. This is purposefully dishonest. As far as I'm concerned it isn't how a Christian should behave.