Methods Of Dating Rock & Fossils

[dad]

So where does that leave your alternate history of the universe story?

On top. Smiling.

 

[NGC 6712]

On top. Smiling.

Not in the missionary position?

 

[Mr Strawberry]

On top. Smiling.

Lol, you just stated that your own fantasy is worthless and then claim it's a winner.

 

[dad]

Not in the missionary position?

In any position I like. Such is the advantage of being in the right position.

 

[dad]

Lol, you just stated that your own fantasy is worthless and then claim it's a winner.

No, I never stated any such weird thing. But of course I win. Don't blame me. Believers can't lose for winning, and so called science losers can't win.

 

[Mr Strawberry]

No, I never stated any such weird thing. But of course I win. Don't blame me.

You said known history is better than making stuff up. We have known history and then we have dad's fantasies.

 

[dad]

You said known history is better than making stuff up. We have known history and then we have dad's fantasies.

So does history involve anything spiritual? If so you have a problem.

 

[NGC 6712]

So does history involve anything spiritual? If so you have a problem.

Of course the fact you have no evidence that your "spiritual" affects physics or chemistry etc. doesn't stop you using it as an excuse to disregard actual evidence.

 

[Mr Strawberry]

So does history involve anything spiritual? If so you have a problem.

Ah, so you confirm that known history is better than your fantasies.

 

[dad]

Of course the fact you have no evidence that your "spiritual" affects physics or chemistry etc.

Yes. We do. Plenty. Jesus rose from the dead. That was quite an effect! Peter walked on water! You have no evidence that the spiritual does not affect things! None.

doesn't stop you using it as an excuse to disregard actual evidence.

I disregard no evidence...ever.

 

[dad]

Ah, so you confirm that known history is better than your fantasies.

No. Better than yours. I accept the reality that the spiritual was a part of things. Why would I join the folks that try to wave it away?

 

[Mr Strawberry]

No. Better than yours. I accept the reality that the spiritual was a part of things. Why would I join the folks that try to wave it away?

So you are now contradicting yourself and saying that making stuff up is better than known history.

 

[dad]

So you are now contradicting yourself and saying that making stuff up is better than known history.

In no way is that what I suggest. The fact that God and the records show us that the past was clearly not like now is not a question. No need to make stuff up. Read stuff. Better than inventing stuff. K?

 

[Mr Strawberry]

In no way is that what I suggest. The fact that God and the records show us that the past was clearly not like now is not a question. No need to make stuff up. Read stuff. Better than inventing stuff. K?

So far you have stated that known history is better than making stuff up and then disagreed with both known history is better than making stuff up and making stuff up is better than known history. This isn't helping your position.

 

[RickG]

Well, as lurkers might realize, decay involves daughter and parent material. Really. The way it works is that the parent produces daughter material in this present state world. It takes a certain amount of time. This can be and is measured. I am not making this stuff up.

Kind of but you left a lot of relevant stuff out. But what you are making up is that that didn't happen in the past. There is zero evidence of any such thing in contrast to mountains of evidence that the past has not physically changed, you just ignore and ridicule all the evidence presented to you.

 

[Elendur]

Kind of but you left a lot of relevant stuff out. But what you are making up is that that didn't happen in the past. There is zero evidence of any such thing in contrast to mountains of evidence that the past has not physically changed, you just ignore and ridicule all the evidence presented to you.

Solution a la dad:

1. Claim there is evidence for DSP.
2. Dismiss the evidence for SSP based on the assumption of the opposite.
3. Ask for more evidence.
4. Ignore posts asking for the evidence for DSP.
5. Throw in a couple of "False!" and reassurances that he doesn't dismiss evidence.

I think I didn't forget anything.

 

[dad]

So far you have stated that known history is better than making stuff up and then disagreed with both known history is better than making stuff up and making stuff up is better than known history. This isn't helping your position.

Not sure where you got so confused. Here is the scoop...I will not allow so called science made up stuff. History records that the spiritual was indeed part of stuff back then.

So maybe study my tennis ball model on rock decay and the two states.

 

[dad]

Kind of but you left a lot of relevant stuff out.

One would leave some things out when, rather than presenting a thesis, one merely posts a line or two on a forum. However, if there is something left out that you feel is important, then simply put er on the table.

But what you are making up is that that didn't happen in the past.

?

What didn't happen? Have you evidence that whatever it was did happen? Simply post it. No need for vagueness and shrillness.

There is zero evidence of any such thing in contrast to mountains of evidence that the past has not physically changed, you just ignore and ridicule all the evidence presented to you.

The only thing you quoted was me mentioning parent to daughter decay...so how does this comment fit? Try to focus.

 

[Mr Strawberry]

Not sure where you got so confused. Here is the scoop...I will not allow so called science made up stuff. History records that the spiritual was indeed part of stuff back then.

So maybe study my tennis ball model on rock decay and the two states.

Your tennis ball model on rock decay...right, because you're not confused at all, lol.

You say something, contradict yourself, deny it, then deny you've denied it, then claim you didn't say it or deny it, then get muddled and forget what you claim you have or haven't said, then decide to change the subject before suddenly losing interest in trying to untangle yourself from the mess you've got yourself into and just just say "anyway, I win".

Tennis ball model...lol.

 

[RickG]

One would leave some things out when, rather than presenting a thesis, one merely posts a line or two on a forum. However, if there is something left out that you feel is important, then simply put er on the table.

Hey! I was actually giving you a compliment.

What didn't happen? Have you evidence that whatever it was did happen? Simply post it. No need for vagueness and shrillness.
The only thing you quoted was me mentioning parent to daughter decay...so how does this comment fit? Try to focus.

You have been given plenty of evidence by myself and others. The problem is you keep ignoring it. You know, when you ask for evidence of something and you are given it; the proper thing to do is discuss it, ask questions, acknowledge your agreements and question what you disagree with by presenting "your" evidence.