Shouldn't judge a band by the fans, although, I haven't any acquiantances that listen to both Limp and AE.StandForTruth said:I was referring primarily to thair fan base.
If you changed your style, yes, but if you didn't.....think about it. If a traditional metal band like Iced Earth change their sound to accomodate "nu-metal" or "death/grind/whatever" metal, because it was more modern, than wouldn't that be selling out? Hence, bands like UFO, BOC, and whoever, don't change their style to accomodate the new sounds, and I like that.Yeah, right. Metal is a music genre, and thus can be defined. If you no longer play music that fits that definition, you are no longer metal.
I'm not saying that, but I do think most rock is influenced by metal and vice versa.Not necessarily. Led Zeppelin had certain elements of metal in their songs that developed into metal as we know it today. If you want to say every band that they ever influenced is metal, then there would be no such thing as rock music, it would all be metal..
Well, that wouldn't be me. I like extreme too much.Heh. You are not necessarily the clueless one, the guy who claimed that extreme metal is not metal is..
It's influenced by metal."Dark" imagery =/= metal. Distortion =/= metal. You can find both in abundance in Industrial music.. is that metal? Hell, is mallcore?
It's part of it, but that wasn't my point at all. That, combined with the sound, the energy, made a package that actually defined metal. The newbie bands merely continue this tradition, altering the sound to suit their era! It's highly commendable too!Heh. So you think the band is "intellectual" and "darkly poetic" and this makes them metal? Screw that.
Let me be the judge of the bands I like, and no, I despise LB. If reviewers think LB play metal I won't dispute it, because millions might agree, and because there is no litmus test for this kind of thing.... I would say they are really subgeneric though, and you and I both know the crowd at their shows would find no Maiden Tees. This is the point- I have a broad definition because our entire society has and shares this definition. LB are not pure in their "metal" sound, that's for sure, but then again, by a purist definition, neither are any of the bands you like- they're all subgeneric on the extreme grind side of things. Personally, I wouldn't say that.Reviews mean nothing. You know how many hundred reviews I could pull up that claim Limp Bizkit play metal?
No, it means Finntroll are eclectic.And yes, they are influential. So? Finntroll are influenced by Polka. Does this mean that Polka is a subgenre of metal? I think not.
Then broaden your definition, because it's rather silly to say that the 70's-80's sound is "not metal". That would imply that "metal" didn't start with the actual metal bands, but with the third or fourth generation sound of grindcore and death metal bands. Awful!Bloody hell. I like most of those bands. I listen to Classical, for God's sake.. "heavy" does not even enter into the equation for whether I listen something or not. Considering that metal was at its most popular in the early 80s, I could hardly "only know what is new".. since it's so much easier to find old stuff anyway, most of the time. And of course classic rock/hard rock can be found just about anywhere, even the 50 year old stuff..
Upvote
0
), it was extremely violent. Was a long way back home and didn't really want to get hurt, so I had to abstain..