I was re-reading a few of my books by and about Meister Eckhart after having done some study into Advaita Vedanta. I knew there were similarities between the two but the level of similarity was shocking when I went through Eckhart again.
There is no evidence that Meister Eckhart new anything about Vedanta or Indian philosophy in general. His worldview was shaped primarily by the Bible and a number of Church fathers especially Augustine and Dionysus (who was himself "accused" of being a monist or pantheist). Yet his Sermons are so similar to traditional Indian teaching that if at the time of their writing they were translated into an Indian dialect and the words "Godhead" given the most appropriate translation as Brahman and God translated as Ishavara the people there would probably assume that it was a perfectly traditional exposition of Vedanta! Among medieval Christians he seems to give the most explicit teaching of no duality.
This leads me to think that non-dualism is a legitimate understanding within the Christian tradition and isn't simply a case of borrowing. I believe that Paul himself may have taught a form of non-dualism that was passed on to Theudas who in turn passed it down to the famous gnostic teacher Valentinus as well. A teaching he passed on only to the mature (or initiates) those who were ready for solid food. So it may have been part of the Christian faith from the get go.
Anyone else have an opinon on the subject?
There is no evidence that Meister Eckhart new anything about Vedanta or Indian philosophy in general. His worldview was shaped primarily by the Bible and a number of Church fathers especially Augustine and Dionysus (who was himself "accused" of being a monist or pantheist). Yet his Sermons are so similar to traditional Indian teaching that if at the time of their writing they were translated into an Indian dialect and the words "Godhead" given the most appropriate translation as Brahman and God translated as Ishavara the people there would probably assume that it was a perfectly traditional exposition of Vedanta! Among medieval Christians he seems to give the most explicit teaching of no duality.
This leads me to think that non-dualism is a legitimate understanding within the Christian tradition and isn't simply a case of borrowing. I believe that Paul himself may have taught a form of non-dualism that was passed on to Theudas who in turn passed it down to the famous gnostic teacher Valentinus as well. A teaching he passed on only to the mature (or initiates) those who were ready for solid food. So it may have been part of the Christian faith from the get go.
Anyone else have an opinon on the subject?