With all the divorce and turn over in relationships- does anyone think that maybe humans shouldn't mate for life? Perhaps we are to mate for some seasons and move on to another partner? It certianly might help diversify the gene pool...
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Foxes have ben known to mate for life (though it's not universal.) There are better examples, but when things have to deal with foxes, I have an obligation to bring it up.Kelly said:I think that we should make every effort to mate for life, but there are hopeless, damaging marriages. There are animals that mate for life...I think ducks do, would have to research tho.
Spoken by someone who does not have children, I'm sure.Annabel Lee said:Humans probably shouldn't mate for life. I think marriages would work out better if we had separate housing....get together once or twice a week and have dinner occasionally.![]()
Crazy Liz said:Spoken by someone who does not have children, I'm sure.![]()
![]()
Primative. It is primative to dedicate your life to another person?foolsparade said:people shouldn't be together with the intention to "mate for life" that is soooo... primative. mating is not the cornerstone of human relations. we are more advanced than the ape.
Yes Havoc, that is the current situation with myself and my mate. I think it's much healthier to the relationship and removes a mass of pressure that would otherwise strangle early bonds. (We've only been together for 2years 1month)The Celts had a tradition called the "Greenwood Marriage". The couple would marry under contract for a year and a day. All Greenwood Marriages began on Beltaine. My wife and I started this way.