• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

MATHEMATICS IN NATURE PROVES INTELLIGENT DESIGN

Status
Not open for further replies.

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Can I conclude from this that in your opinion, we would not be able to make sense of the universe by using mathematical models to describe said universe or aspects thereof?
You certainly can conclude that if you so wish but it wouldn't be true.
 
Upvote 0

Radrook

Well-Known Member
Feb 25, 2016
11,539
2,726
USA
Visit site
✟150,380.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
That's exactly what it means. Every definition of intelligent design states that intelligent design is falsified if we can find a natural process that explains the observation. Click on the links in your own freaking signature. They say that very thing.
Are you proposing that I am obligated to accept any fervently feverish insanity that someone might come up with simply because it is called a stated definition?
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,792
✟254,941.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Dear honorable and venerable: Readers

Please note that I have repeatedly and patiently striven might and main to clearly explain what my position is in reference to this subject is but to totally no avail. Instead, there is always the inevitable and constant claims that I am being unclear, evasive and obfuscating the issues involved. I fervently invite you dear reader to meticulously examine all my responses in order to verify for yourselves that what I am saying is totally true. That there is really no justifiable reason to constantly claim either complete obscurity or partial lack of clarity. That I have been exceedingy forthright in my explanations and have exercised both admirable prudence and wisdom where impertinent impatience and ghastly rudeness might have been a temptation. I wait with bated breath-dear reader as you objectively and meticulously purvey the abundant evidence which I gladly and confidently place at your disposal for your judicious evaluation.

Your Humble servant and fellow human bean
Radrook

:)


If many people are telling you the same thing, maybe, just maybe....................
 
Upvote 0

TagliatelliMonster

Well-Known Member
Sep 22, 2016
4,292
3,373
46
Brugge
✟81,672.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
You certainly can conclude that if you so wish but it wouldn't be true.

Okay.

In that case, I'm going to need you to explain to me how an intelligently designed universe is going to be different from a non-designed universe.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.