- Aug 4, 2005
- 12,546
- 372
- 71
- Faith
- Methodist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Yeah they bought and sold their daughters like cattle...
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
KCDAD said:Yeah they bought and sold their daughters like cattle...
Yeah they bought and sold their daughters like cattle...
BuddhistPitBull said:Do you actually believe that all women are to be are "helpers" to their man?
That somehow women are *gasp* not equal to men...in a marriage CONTRACT?
I'm sorry but this is the 21st century. Don't give modern women that load of crap.
BuddhistPitBull said:Do you actually believe that all women are to be are "helpers" to their man? That somehow women are *gasp* not equal to men...in a marriage CONTRACT?
I'm sorry but this is the 21st century. Don't give modern women that load of crap.
Its funny..if you read Jewish legend you find out about Adam's first "wife" Lillith...no wonder she high-tailed it out of there....
Leanna said:Where is this? In the Psuedepigrapha? That would be the old Jewish texts that have been voted "not inspired"... I have both volumes on my bookshelf. Where is it in there, or where else can I find this story? I am not trying to be "smart" but well informed. Please tell me where to find such a story. I've read a lot of Jewish literature and haven't run across it....
Lilith as Adam's first wife
The passage in Genesis 1:27 "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them" (before describing a mate being made of Adam's rib and being called Eve in Genesis 2:22) is sometimes believed to be an indication that Adam had a wife before Eve.
A medieval reference to Lilith as the first wife of Adam is the anonymous The Alphabet of Ben-Sira, written sometime between the 8th and 11th centuries. Lilith is described as refusing to assume a subservient role to Adam during sexual intercourse and so deserting him ("She said, 'I will not lie below,' and he said, 'I will not lie beneath you, but only on top. For you are fit only to be in the bottom position, while I am to be the superior one.'"). Lilith promptly uttered the name of God, took to the air, and left the Garden, settling on the Red Sea coast. As a side note, this places Lilith in a unique position, for she left the Garden of her own accord and before the Fall of Man, and so is untouched by the Tree of Knowledge. However, according to legend, she also knows the "true name of God".
Lilith then went on to mate with Asmodai and various other demons she found beside the Red Sea, creating countless lilin. Adam urged God to bring Lilith back, so three angels were dispatched after her. When the angels, Senoy, Sansenoy, and Semangelof, made threats to kill one hundred of Lilith's demonic children for each day she stayed away, she countered that she would prey eternally upon the descendants of Adam and Eve, who could be saved only by invoking the names of the three angels. She did not return to Adam.
The background and purpose of The Alphabet of Ben-Sira is unclear. It is a collection of stories about heroes of the Bible and Talmud, it may have been a collection of folk-tales, a refutation of Christian, Karaite, or other separatist movements; its content seems so offensive to contemporary Jews that it was even suggested that it could be an anti-Jewish satire [4], although, in any case, the text was accepted by the Jewish mystics of medieval Germany.
The Alphabet of Ben-Sira is the earliest surviving source of the story, and the conception that Lilith was Adam's first wife became only widely known with the 17th century Lexicon Talmudicum of Johannes Buxtorf.
In the late 19th century, the Scottish Christian author George MacDonald incorporated the story of Lilith as Adam's first wife and predator of Eve's children into a mythopoeic fantasy novel in the Romantic style.
The role of Lilith as Adam's faithless wife has parallels with the ideas about Eve herself in the Unification theology of Sun Myung Moon.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lillith
Sophia7 said:Here is a quote from Wikipedia regarding the origins of this myth. Generally, Lilith was portrayed in ancient literature as a female Mesopotamian night demon. The idea of Lilith as the first wife of Adam apparently arose in the Middle Ages and was referenced in The Alphabet of Ben-Sira and also appeared in some parts of the Kabbala. This concept is not biblical.
Leanna said:Hmmm well I wouldn't call that Jewish myth at all. "It is dated to anywhere between AD 700 and 1000." Hmmm. I was thinking intertestamental literature at worst.... yeah...
The reason there are two creation stories one in Genesis 1 and one in Genesis 2 is because one of them was addressing/refuting the Babylonian creation story directly.... they are two separate accounts of creation and are not to be taken in order ... so their "scriptual" reasoning is terrible. :o
Lilith is described as refusing to assume a subservient role to Adam during sexual intercourse and so deserting him ("She said, 'I will not lie below,' and he said, 'I will not lie beneath you, but only on top. For you are fit only to be in the bottom position, while I am to be the superior one.'"
Sophia7 said:I agree!
LouTheWicked said:Wow, I can see why she left...
"Now, Wife, get under me so that I can impregnate you, for you are the lower being!"
KCDAD said:So which one is accurate? Man and woman created together on the 6th day or woman created sometime later when man got lonely after naming all the animals?
Sophia7 said:Well, I agree. That would be pretty bad if it were true, but this story didn't come from the Bible. Myths about a female demonic creature called Lillith way predated the idea that she was Adam's first wife. That is only a fairly recent concept, without biblical support.
