- Mar 15, 2003
- 814
- 9
- 69
- Faith
- Word of Faith
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Constitution
To all;
It seems the idea, that God will put or use sickness to "teach" you something or to "glorify Him" is prevalent among some of the different abominations, er, I mean denominations (relax, that was a feeble attempt at humor...).
What I don't understand is, how can this doctrine even be accepted without any thought, to the Nature of God, the examples in the Old Testament days that were written for our admonation and the promises of God to us as believers?
I have argued and for some of those who would prefer, "debated", the fallacies of the "God uses sickness to teach you something" doctrine. We all know that God is the same yesterday, today and forever. We also have heard it said that God changes not. If that is the case, then why didn't God just smite the rebellous "children of Israel" that He brought out of Egypt?
According to today's doctrine, God should have made those people sick so they would have turned around and walked in His ways! If God uses or puts sickness on people to teach them something, then why, I ask you, didn't He do that to those people? If there was ever anybody that needed to learn God's ways, they were the ones...but did God afflict them?
All I can tell you is, God sent them back out to the wilderness and told them they were not going to enter the promised land because of their disobedience and their children under twenty would go in. God did shorten their lifespans from 120 years down to 70 or 80 years. But the whole time those people were in the wilderness, none of them got sick, their clothes never wore out and they were fed manna from Heaven and given water from a rock. God still took care of them!
In Psalm 91, you can see the nature of God. You can see that if you set your love on Him and walk in His ways, He will protect you from (in today's times) biological weapons, terrorist attacks, anthrax in the mail and any other form of pestilences. Whenever our boys get sent to fight in a war, Psalms 91 has been written on paper and they would carry the Psalm 91 scripture wherever they went. They read it and read it and read it untill they had it memorized and it went into their heart and faith came with it in the process. There are many, many testimonies from the battlefield of miraculous and divine interventions that saved their lives. So we know that God's promise, "Psalms 91" works!
I wonder if any of the devotees of the "God uses sickness to teach" or the groupies of the "it might not be God's will for you to be healed" bunch, have even read the end of Psalm 91? Let's go look and see...
[align=center]Psalms 91:16 in Various Translations...[/align]
The word, "salvation" is taken from the Hebrew word, yesh-oo'-aw. The following is from the Strong's Hebrew Dictionary;
H3444
ישׁוּעה
yesh-oo'-aw
Feminine passive participle of H3467; something saved, that is, (abstractly) deliverance; hence aid, victory, prosperity: - deliverance, health, help (-ing), salvation, save, saving (health), welfare.
Strong's Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries
Hmm, I see that the idea of prosperity and welfare are also included in the definition of the word salvation, along with health.
Ok, does this show that God wants us to he happy, with long life and health, without need of anything (prosperity)?
Talk to me and if you want to refute this, then please use two or more different instances in the Bible, with the references, to back your stance.
Thank you and blessings to all...
It seems the idea, that God will put or use sickness to "teach" you something or to "glorify Him" is prevalent among some of the different abominations, er, I mean denominations (relax, that was a feeble attempt at humor...).
What I don't understand is, how can this doctrine even be accepted without any thought, to the Nature of God, the examples in the Old Testament days that were written for our admonation and the promises of God to us as believers?
I have argued and for some of those who would prefer, "debated", the fallacies of the "God uses sickness to teach you something" doctrine. We all know that God is the same yesterday, today and forever. We also have heard it said that God changes not. If that is the case, then why didn't God just smite the rebellous "children of Israel" that He brought out of Egypt?
According to today's doctrine, God should have made those people sick so they would have turned around and walked in His ways! If God uses or puts sickness on people to teach them something, then why, I ask you, didn't He do that to those people? If there was ever anybody that needed to learn God's ways, they were the ones...but did God afflict them?
All I can tell you is, God sent them back out to the wilderness and told them they were not going to enter the promised land because of their disobedience and their children under twenty would go in. God did shorten their lifespans from 120 years down to 70 or 80 years. But the whole time those people were in the wilderness, none of them got sick, their clothes never wore out and they were fed manna from Heaven and given water from a rock. God still took care of them!
In Psalm 91, you can see the nature of God. You can see that if you set your love on Him and walk in His ways, He will protect you from (in today's times) biological weapons, terrorist attacks, anthrax in the mail and any other form of pestilences. Whenever our boys get sent to fight in a war, Psalms 91 has been written on paper and they would carry the Psalm 91 scripture wherever they went. They read it and read it and read it untill they had it memorized and it went into their heart and faith came with it in the process. There are many, many testimonies from the battlefield of miraculous and divine interventions that saved their lives. So we know that God's promise, "Psalms 91" works!
I wonder if any of the devotees of the "God uses sickness to teach" or the groupies of the "it might not be God's will for you to be healed" bunch, have even read the end of Psalm 91? Let's go look and see...
[align=center]Psalms 91:16 in Various Translations...[/align]
- 1599 Geneva Bible...With long life wil I satisfie him, and shew him my saluation. (that's old english, the "u" instead of our "v")
- Literal Translation of the Holy Bible, J.P. Green, Sr. Interlinear Greek and Hebrew Bible...I will satisfy him with length of days, and will make Him see My salvation.
- 1833 Webster's Bible...With long life will I satisfy him, and show him my salvation.
- 1898 Young's Literal Translation...With length of days I satisfy him, And I cause him to look on My salvation!
- King James Version with Strong's numbers...With long753 life3117 will I satisfy7646 him, and show7200 him my salvation.3444
- The Amplified Bible...With long life will I satisfy him and show him My salvation.
The word, "salvation" is taken from the Hebrew word, yesh-oo'-aw. The following is from the Strong's Hebrew Dictionary;
H3444
ישׁוּעה
yesh-oo'-aw
Feminine passive participle of H3467; something saved, that is, (abstractly) deliverance; hence aid, victory, prosperity: - deliverance, health, help (-ing), salvation, save, saving (health), welfare.
Strong's Hebrew and Greek Dictionaries
Hmm, I see that the idea of prosperity and welfare are also included in the definition of the word salvation, along with health.
Ok, does this show that God wants us to he happy, with long life and health, without need of anything (prosperity)?
Talk to me and if you want to refute this, then please use two or more different instances in the Bible, with the references, to back your stance.
Thank you and blessings to all...