Lunar Water

[thaumaturgy]

Well, if the number represent His will, anyone can. Go ahead, pick 5 pre split stars, give them all wildly different speeds. Make an equation.

OK!

onion * garden rake[sup]2[/sup]/orange = 1/8 harbor[sub]seal[/sub]

 

[dad]

OK!

onion * garden rake[sup]2[/sup]/orange = 1/8 harbor[sub]seal[/sub]

Star O, star Y, star B, star Z, and star P. Compared to present light speed (C), then, we have, on fine former state day...

C[sup]22[/sup] = B C[sup]107[/sup]=O C [sup]1002[/sup]= Y C[sup]8001[/sup]= Z C[sup]10,012[/sup]=P



W (God's will)





__--- So [B,Z,O,P,Y] times Former light speed = W



If you crunched the numbers, you would see that they do not add up to the speed of the same star's light in this state.


This brings to mind an interesting question. Can we measure the speed of light coming in from these star's right now!!!?

I don't mean from the sun to here, or from one end of a lab to another, or some such. How does science know the speed light from a star is traveling?

You see, your educated posts contain things that make me ask deep questions. What would we do without man's wisdom giving us that little extra boost?

 

[Nathan Poe]

Well, if the number represent His will, anyone can. Go ahead, pick 5 pre split stars, give them all wildly different speeds. Make an equation.

So, all the jokes people make about you aren't really jokes -- you really are making this stuff up as you go along?

 

[Cabal]

Star O, star Y, star B, star Z, and star P. Compared to present light speed (C), then, we have, on fine former state day...

C[sup]22[/sup] = B C[sup]107[/sup]=O C [sup]1002[/sup]= Y C[sup]8001[/sup]= Z C[sup]10,012[/sup]=P



W (God's will)





__--- So [B,Z,O,P,Y] times Former light speed = W



If you crunched the numbers, you would see that they do not add up to the speed of the same star's light in this state.

Gee, how funny, given that you set things up to give you those results.

 

[dad]

So, all the jokes people make about you aren't really jokes -- you really are making this stuff up as you go along?

I ask some questions. Test the limits of our knowledge. The bible points out that, even now, stars differ in glory.


1Co 15:41 -There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory. It also reminds us in this same chapter of the heavenly nature, versus this nature!


49 And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly. 50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.


There is no reason I know of to bind all the stars in the heavenly state, to one speed...?? Speak now if you have some reason.


I looked up how we measure light speed quickly, and found only on the planet measurements, and in the solar system measurements!

To rephrase the question in the last post, 'How do we know that the light coming in right now from the stars is all the same speed, or even at what speed?

 

[dad]

Gee, how funny, given that you set things up to give you those results.

Right. I used a realistic example, an educated guess. For we know that starlight reached earth, and Adam creation week. Do you think I underestimated in the examples?

I makes me wonder if science could tell if it was still coming in that way.

 

[Nathan Poe]

I ask some questions. Test the limits of our knowledge. The bible points out that, even now, stars differ in glory.


1Co 15:41 -There is one glory of the sun, and another glory of the moon, and another glory of the stars: for one star differeth from another star in glory. It also reminds us in this same chapter of the heavenly nature, versus this nature!

I guess stars are like people -- some are bright; some are dim.

 

[dad]

I guess stars are like people -- some are bright; some are dim.

Very good. Some are naughty, some are nice. Some are fast, some are slow.

 

[Nathan Poe]

Very good. Some are naughty, some are nice. Some are fast, some are slow.

Is it possible you're overpersonifying?

 

[dad]

Is it possible you're overpersonifying?

Could you be under achieving, in the content dept?

 

[Nathan Poe]

Could you be under achieving, in the content dept?

Answer my question and I'll answer yours.

 

[dad]

Answer my question and I'll answer yours.

Don't be Poe. Talk to us about topical things, things that relate to the OP. Things about clouds rising up like a genie from a lamp, and forming the moon. Things like the fables science resorts to to explain the lunar water. Things like how we know distant star light is coming at us at the light speed we see in out solar system...etc.

 

[Nathan Poe]

Don't be Poe. Talk to us about topical things, things that relate to the OP. Things about clouds rising up like a genie from a lamp, and forming the moon. Things like the fables science resorts to to explain the lunar water. Things like how we know distant star light is coming at us at the light speed we see in out solar system...etc.

Can't answer my question, can you?

Can't commit your own unforgivable sin of admitting fallibility?

Consider yourself defeated, dad.

 

[dad]

Can't answer my question, can you?

Can't commit your own unforgivable sin of admitting fallibility?

Consider yourself defeated, dad.

One cannot be defeated by silly strawmen questions, that are insane, and off topic.

What defeats one, is a failure to address the real issues actually being discussed in a meaningful way.

I am not here to play games.

 

[Nathan Poe]

What defeats one, is a failure to address the real issues actually being discussed in a meaningful way.

You don't consider the possibily of reading too much into something to be meaningful?

I am not here to play games.

Of course you are, dad -- you post funny stuff; the rest of us laugh at you; a good time is had by all.

Lather, Rinse, Repeat.

 

[dad]

You don't consider the possibily of reading too much into something to be meaningful?

Some with problems of perception might think too much is made of what they miss.

I think this is enough diversion for me, address the topics.

 

[Nathan Poe]

Some with problems of perception might think too much is made of what they miss.

Couldn't agree more.

I think this is enough diversion for me, address the topics.

Already did -- I already said that the most plausible explanation for the presence of ice is a comet impact.

Hardly a stretch, since the Moon's covered with impact craters.

Now's about the time for you to say something funny.

 

[dad]

Couldn't agree more.



Already did -- I already said that the most plausible explanation for the presence of ice is a comet impact.

Hardly a stretch, since the Moon's covered with impact craters.

...

So, in other words, you don't know where the meteor or comet came from. OK. The OP link listed earth as a source of the material that impacted the moon, and left water. Both science and the bible seem to be in agreement to some extent here.

The article even mentions wind. Solar wind. In todays news, they link the sunspots with magnetic fields.

"Solar wind generated by the sun is probably driven by a process involving powerful magnetic fields, according to a new study led by UCL .."

Solar winds triggered by magnetic fields


We also know that there were a lot of magnetic reversals and activity on earth, and it is related to the time of the separation of continents. (i.e. the sea floor, etc)

Again, a link with science and the bible.

 

[Nathan Poe]

So, in other words, you don't know where the meteor or comet came from. OK.

I don't think it would be too much of a leap to say "outer space."

The OP link listed earth as a source of the material that impacted the moon, and left water. Both science and the bible seem to be in agreement to some extent here.

Actually, dad, the OP link listed Earth as one of four possible sources. Did you not notice the other three, or did you choose to ignore them?

The article even mentions wind. Solar wind. In todays news, they link the sunspots with magnetic fields.

Because solar wind is the term for charged particles ejected from the sun.

We also know that there were a lot of magnetic reversals and activity on earth, and it is related to the time of the separation of continents. (i.e. the sea floor, etc)

Again, a link with science and the bible.

Actually, it's a link you just fabricated -- you've never been able to connect the magnetic reversals with the time of the separation of continents.

Come to think of it, you've never been able to connect anything with the time of the separation of continents.

This is all moderately amusing, dad -- but not even close to your A-list material.

 

[dad]

I don't think it would be too much of a leap to say "outer space."

Space, yes, the theories from science admit that much, but have earth as the source first.

Bottom line, we don't know, but science accepts earth as a real possibility.

I find it funny evos are willing to accept space as long as it doesn't involve God. They waft in a mysterious planet to smash with earth from 'space' they waft in ice pellets (or whatever) enough for the oceans from space. The waft in a first lifeform, or the ingredients for the self cooking recipe from space. They have all the platinum, and gold, and etc etc wafted in from space, because they see it doesn't fit the creation story unless their do!

Actually, dad, the OP link listed Earth as one of four possible sources. Did you not notice the other three, or did you choose to ignore them?

No, I saw them, but they are foolish. At least with earth, they have a nearby actual known source.

Because solar wind is the term for charged particles ejected from the sun.

Right, .....and..?? Point? If they are right about that wind hitting earth, and taking water, one imagines that it could also produce wind in our atmosphere, at least near where it was focused. Obviously in space, it would not be wind as we think of it.

Actually, it's a link you just fabricated -- you've never been able to connect the magnetic reversals with the time of the separation of continents.

"Extending those measurements to the oceans, around 1960, revealed a surprising difference. In the ocean floor the magnetization was orderly, arranged in long strips. The strips on the Atlantic ocean floor, in particular, all seemed parallel to the "mid-Atlantic ridge." That is a volcanic ridge running roughly north-to-south (with some zigs and zags), halfway between Europe-Africa and America. It is marked by the focus-points of earthquakes and by some volcanic islands, and more recently it was explored by research submarines, which have at times observed lava oozing out at its crest."
Magnetic Reversals and Moving Continents

Come to think of it, you've never been able to connect anything with the time of the separation of continents.

Seafloor Spreading Interactive

A pattern exists. It is a link. The only question is how long that time was.