Senecharnix
The Emissary
- Dec 24, 2010
- 937
- 15
- 71
- Faith
- Christian Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
And I would say that just like current events, the facts are turned into propaganda, and if we examine the facts we will see how it is the interpretation of events that is in error...not the events.
It is a matter of faith: that God has revealed to man His will and that He has preserved what He revealed in Holy Scripture.
If one does not have faith that the same word by which he came to faith through is worthy of acceptation, then one has nothing to bse that faith on.
If Paul's teaching concerning salvation is accepted, then Paul's teaching concerning the behavior of the Christian should be accepted as well. If Paul's teaching contradicts what God has previously said, then we might have cause to question whether he wrote under inspiration, or his teachings are spurious.
Funny, but I have never heard of a Christian Scholar coming to this conclusion.
And Scholars are in major agreement that 99.99% has been reclaimed.
No different than with the Hebrew scriptures.
Yet there is no belief that they were not copied meticulously and that they have by and large there is no reason to think they have been corrupted and most importantly...the manuscript discrepancies do not affect the teaching within.
It is like translational differences...one can read most of them and still come to the same conclusions as to what is being taught.
I use to be very anti-Catholic, until I started to meet them and discuss their personal beliefs. Just as you set forth your experience among people as a basis for your understanding, so do I. Ihave come to realize that there is no set "right group" or "wrong group" (among believers, that is) but we have a landscape of believers that are at different stages of growth as they seek to learn about God through both study and the inworking of the Holy Spirit. Do not confuse that to mean I do not also recognize that there is sound doctrine and erroneous doctrine...I do. And there is much in Catholic doctrine that I find in error, and there is much in Catholic practice that I also see to be in error. But, I can see that even in the fellowship I attend, which I attend because I believe their doctrine is closer to sound doctrine than other groups. But htat does not mean, just like with Catholics, that all of the people there understand the doctrine this faith teaches. I have said many times, there are people in certain groups that do not know enough about the doctrine their professed faith teaches to either be damned or saved.
It works both ways.
So what do we do? We examine scripture and compare the doctrine and practice of both the groups and the people within those groups and see how it conforms to the doctrine of God.
I might be able to say, "I am opposed to Catholic doctrine and consider it a religion with many faults, even though it has tenets which I am in agreement with," but I will not say "Every Catholic is in error and doomed to Hell," lol.
I have talked with Catholics that have a better testimony than some that have a better doctrine, in that, they have resembled Christ in their behavior closer than some who though I would agree with their doctrine, I would rebuke for their...behavior.
And I think there is much we could condemn in the history of the Catholic Church. But then, there is much we could condemn in Christendom whether it is historical or modern. It disgusts me that the world can take those that claim to be Christian and claim to teach the Doctrines of God and use them to illustrate that Christianity is ridiculous. Charismatics are a ready resource for the world to mock and ridicule and blaspheme God. The failures of the men that people place thier trust in, rather than God, also displayed to illustrate hypocrisy and bad practice among so-called Christians.
Okay...lets look at their doctrine.
It is easily enough examined in light of what scripture teaches.
That is where the work is done, Senecharnix.
And it is when the implication that men have to trust...men, comes into the picture that we see a departure from faith unto religion.
There is no question that God has established leadership in the body. He established leadership in the first institution He created, which is the family. So to condemn leadership as a whole is as in error to condemn all who belong to a particular group.
Even in the world system we see leadership which for the most part, is necessary. It is good to have police officers, for instance.
While as believers we are called to give honor to those that minister the word, we do not replace the authority of God and His word with service to those who have charge of us. We are to measure the teachings and direction of the established leadership according to the doctrines of God, and when we find discrepancy between what they teach and what God has taught us, we are to remove ourselves from their influence.
But we do not disregard that scripture teaches there is to be leadership. Else, we would have exactly what we see here on this forum: every man teaching his truth, rather than teaching the truth of God.
Continued...
You are making a huge and erroneous assumption if you are implying that I hate Catholics. I have known many Catholics and have not hated any of them. One of my favorite former girlfriends was Catholic. A fellow that I consider one of my counselors of wisdom is Catholic I have met some Catholics that I suspect are true children of God. The funny thing is that not one of them is a Bible-thumper. They live their faith rather than traipse about, quoting scripture to prove how wonderful they are. Nonetheless, the war that I help wage against the Catholic Church is only about her nonsense, such as the Papacy, her false doctrines, and history of wickedness and deception .
The Charismatics deserve ridicule and mockery. I perceived just how evil their version of Christianity is before the Son told me straight out that they are evil. He meant them and their infernal religion of deception .
One of the biggest differences in how you and I see things is this: It seems you are one of those folks who believe in an all-or-nothing interpretation of the Bible. Oh, it must be pure, perfect, and every word must have been written by God through saintly prophets and giants of the faithor it is total nonsense. Yours truly, in turn, can appreciate and love it for it actually is rather than indulge in an impulse to idolize it for what it is not....
You are a literalist. I see truth where I find it in the Bible and regard much of it as figuratively true, though factually challenged. But I have also discovered much in it that is untrue literally and figuratively .
Let me give you some clues about how I look at the Bible and why I feel the way I do about it. During quite a few of my encounters with God or the Son in visions, revelatory dreams, and other mystical experiences, they have communicated with me directly through the Bible. Likewise, they have presented Bibles to me, during such experiences. Then there are the occasions in which the Son has allowed me to study his version of the Bible. Though I am not at liberty to impart much about what I discovered thusly, I can tell you that our versions of a Bible are pitiful compared to his version, which is exceedingly comprehensive. Interpret that however you may .
Certain individuals and I have done our best to try to get folks who think like you to open your eyes and ears and grasp the truth, concerning the matters under discussion here. But you refuse to reach for the most elemental aspect of what it is to be a true child of God. If God dwells in a persons heart, He will enlighten them through the diligence of His true Living Word, the Holy Spirit. Consequently, a Bible of pure truth will be written in their mind, heart, spirit, and soul. The Holy Spirit inspired the truth that can be found in the Bible .
What is better? To drink pure water from a spring? Or drink water from a bottle peddled by someone who claims to have obtained the water from its source?...
Christianity has gone out of its way to provide the folks on the outside of its carnival much ammo to use against it
But we do not disregard that scripture teaches there is to be leadership. Else, we would have exactly what we see here on this forum: every man teaching his truth, rather than teaching the truth of God.--as opposed to the hodgepodge of denominations, sects, and cults that compose so-called Christianity All people dumb and brilliant have their own minds and perspectives. Whether they read the same thing, hear the same thing, see the same thing, or experience the same thing, they will inevitably imagine their own unique interpretations of what they have read, heard, seen, or experienced. And so, if there are 2.2 billion believers, then there are 2.2 billion versions of the Faith Even the true children of God will understand what they learn from God, the Son, the Holy Spirit, the Bible, and experiences, according to their level of understanding, and act on such, according to their personalities and whatever service God has designed for them .
Last edited:
Upvote
0