Perhaps it isn't exactly evolution, but it contains evolutionary theory at its core.I do not have any problem with population genetics. I have studied it quite a bit. But that is NOT evolution.
And so you just ignore reams of evidence in support of common descent. You have yet to respond to the ERV evidence, for example, with anything but blind disbelief. Got anything more substantial?A lot of things that you consider evoluton I do not have a problem with. That is why I am thinking I need to be more effective in the way I communicate to show people that it is the theory of common descent that I have a problem with. Which actually maybe a very small part of the theory of evolution in this day and age. But there are some people that make a big deal out of it. But they are not the people who are working and doing research because it does not pertain to what they are doing.
I do not have any problem with population genetics. I have studied it quite a bit. But that is NOT evolution.
how you can say that evolution and genetics have nothing in common.
Would it surprise you to hear that Mendel probably fudged on his figures? That no one repeating his experiments with peas get nearly the perfect results that he did?They are two different theorys and two different people. One is Darwin and the other is Mendel. Darwin has been falsifed only Mendel turned out to be true. Then they came out with something called neo darwinism that turned out to be a vain attempt to save darwinism.
They are two different theorys and two different people. One is Darwin and the other is Mendel. Darwin has been falsifed only Mendel turned out to be true. Then they came out with something called neo darwinism that turned out to be a vain attempt to save darwinism.
That was my question, what is the Bible refering to in Rev. 14:11?Which temple are you referring to?
With the GAP theory people use science to better understand the Bible.Uh-huh.
So tell me John, what practical applications does the gap-theory has again?
Here you go:How, pray tell, has Darwin's theory of evolution been falsified?
However, on the ordinary understanding of falsification, Darwinian evolution can be falsified.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/evolphil/falsify.html
With the GAP theory people use science to better understand the Bible.
So how is a vague out of context pulled quote got anything to do with science? there isn't any mention of dust, there isn't any mention of darkness, and your own extrapolartions are only strung together by a vague line of thought.In this example the Bible tells us where there is ruin there is going to be darkness. This is most often caused by volcanos, but there could be other causes. A meteor for example, or the situation with the twin towers.
So the theory would predict that when you study mass extinctions look for dust, smoke, ash and so forth. Or even poison or gas. Because a volcanic erruption can cause all of this and the effect may appear up to 10,000 miles way from the volcano.
John, Do you understand the difference between Has Been and Can Be?
The Difference between past and future?
The difference between actual and possible?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?