Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You seem to forget that the officer will be investigated. He is getting his dues. Justice takes time.
They don't have to finish investigating him before arresting him.
Tough being an employee now out of work or a franchise owner without a business and with debts to pay, but hey - corporate assets right?
I just won't rush to the defense of easily replaceable, insured property.
And you seriously believe that the low-income housing that was burned down falls into that category?
I bet it's insured and I bet the insurance company will do their best to wiggle out of paying. Probably say that arson isn't covered or something like that.It better; it would be ridiculously irresponsible otherwise to have it uninsured. Everyone was losing the heads over the Target coming under siege though, that's what I'm laughing about. People get more incensed over corporate property destruction and use that as an excuse to ignore the police brutality and system sanctioned murder.
They don't have to finish investigating him before arresting him. They could have arrested him the day Floyd died. Charge him with manslaughter or murder 3 or whatever is appropriate for Minnesota.
So bypass all procedures and satisfy the mob? Do you know that if you botched an investigation phase you risk letting the suspect loose on technicality in court?
It better; it would be ridiculously irresponsible otherwise to have it uninsured. Everyone was losing the heads over the Target coming under siege though, that's what I'm laughing about. People get more incensed over corporate property destruction and use that as an excuse to ignore the police brutality and system sanctioned murder.
Alleged murder. Like I said, I want to know what actually happened.
Arresting a suspect is a perfectly common police procedure. No bypass necessary.
Then go watch the video.
They sat on his neck for at least 8 minutes.
I've seen the video. However, that doesn't tell me how George Floyd wound up in that position, nor what on earth the policemen thought they were doing restraining him in that way.
"
assuming he’d ever resisted in the first place
It doesn’t take a genius to realize that the guy under you isn’t fighting back.
That is in fact one of the important questions.
No it's not. Example if you're suspected of stealing something the police first have to investigate the crime scene, maybe make a case to a judge to get a warrant to search your property for signs of the stolen item then when there is enough evidence book you. Each case is unique.
How about you let the investigation run its course.
On Reddit (where ppl can post anonymously) there are a ton of cops and military saying this was murder, because they are trained 1) not to leave someone in that position for any longer than necessary since it is medically dangerous and 2) you NEVER use pressure or force around the neck, it is the easiest way to kill someone.And I'd like to know exactly what happened. It certainly wasn't correct police procedure, and so the policemen losing their jobs was obviously justified.
But was it more than that? Was George Floyd on drugs, as has been claimed? If so, which drugs? Was this an unfortunate outcome after a lengthy struggle to restrain him, or was it a crime? What's the "other evidence" that the Hennepin County Attorney was talking about? What was the sequence of events that took place before the video that everybody has seen? Did George Floyd actually resist arrest at all, or did he comply with police instructions?
We don't commonly arrest suspects?
Arresting a suspect is a perfectly common police procedure. No bypass necessary.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?