Der Alter said:
Garbage! Total rotting garbage! First, you know diddly about Constantine. Have you ever read anything written by the historians Lactantius or Eusebius, who lived at the time of Constantine? Have you ever read any histories written within 1-2 generations of Constantine? No, you have not! You have been reading and listening to the lies and garbage of uninformed revisionists.
How do you know when the so-called gospel of Thomas was written? And, how do you know it is not the psychotic ramblings of some mentally deficient mad man? Just because some writings were found buried in the sand does not make them authentic. Even the LDS claim their primary scriptures were found buried in the ground after hundreds of years.
Evidently your god is weak and powerless, he cant even preserve his word. It appears all your god could do was bury one copy of Thomas in the sand for almost 2000 years. My God said in Isaiah 55:11
So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper [in the thing] whereto I sent it.
My God said He would build His church on The Rock and the gates of hell would not prevail against it. According to what you are trying to sell, the gates of hell prevailed against your god for 2000 years.
A lot of people around here are just like the Greek philosophers Paul preached to, they spend their time wanting to hear some new thing.
Der Alter,
[Edited by a moderator]
I don't know if you got a chance to see it before it was killed, but I did react with a similar attitude to the one that you show in this post and I was wrong to do so.
[Edited by a moderator]
I agree with your assesment of when The Gospel of Thomas was written... 200 AD at the latest, probably earlier but not earlier than 100 AD. However, from my understanding, none of the Gospels were written as eye-witness accounts of Jesus's life. Rather all were written from a presumed source document commonly refered to as "Q". Authors had their different takes on Jesus, John being the most radical in that he was the only one to call Jesus God. This is not because of direct experience but because of their opinions, divinely inspired or not, of who Jesus Christ was.
I have not read the ancient historians account of Constantine as you so politely suggested I hadn't. However, I seriously doubt that any reasonable person can make the argument that Constantine was Christian man in the sense of following Christ's teachings. Certainly he did not turn the other cheek in his life time. Also, I doubt that a reasonable person could say that Constantine did not oversee the persecution of heretics and the destruction of heretical writings. If Gnostics were prevailed over by the gates of hell as you suggest, it was because they followed Jesus's example of turning the other cheek instead of destroying their enemies. You must be honest here and admit that until recent years, the catholic Church (I mean to say orthodox Christianity in general) was responsible for a good number of "holy wars". Certainly this doesn't lessen the value of the faith... but the politcal institutions have been far from successful in following the example laid down by Jesus Christ.
Your shot at "my God" shows a gross misunderstanding of Gnostic ideas. What you fail to realize is that "your God" is merely an attempt to understand "my God". Gnostic myth, much like the Bible, is not to be taken literally. If you view the demiurge as a human created mental construct then you might understand it a little better. For example, if you and I were in a room together and you looked at me, you would not actually see me... or hear me or sense me using any of the five senses. What you see is merely light reflected on your retina, you hear vibrations in the air, etc. Your mental construct of me is based on your own imperfect understanding, inflicted by the imperfection intrinsic to human vision, human touch, human hearing, etc. Continuing this metaphore, if I were God... what you percieve to be me would be the Demiurge. This is not to say that I believe that a perfect and loving god could create a world such as this. I do not. To me, the demiurge, whatever it is (I don't pretend to know), is what created "reality". "Reality" is a just separation from God. God is not to be understood by the mind. The evils of this world are so foul, I seriously doubt that God could be directly responsible for them.
The God that Moses worshipped has a very different idea of right and wrong than Jesus. Eye for and eye vs. Turn the other cheek. Clearly, the God of the OT is not the same as Jesus Christ's Father. It is the difference between a vengeful God and a loving God. I personally believe that some of the OT was inspired by God and some by this demiurge. No man sees God in the same way as another man because every man sees God with is own prejudices... or in the fundamentalist's case other men's prejudices.
Chaindog