- A little later, we learn that Peter himself has decided to come and visit them. The news is greeted with great joy by the community. Many have never met the chief apostle, but he enjoys great prestige. Upon his arrival, the Christians showed reverence and enthusiasm and monitored Peter's behavior. The members of the Church of Antioch are happy to see the fisherman of Capernaum willingly share the meal of the non-Jews. This is for them an indication that the “first council” was fruitful.
- In Jerusalem, however, worry changes into distrust. The mother Church, inspired by James, judges that Peter goes too far. New messengers are sent to him to remind him that it is not because certain pagans want to become Christians that they are full members of the people of God. Jews who recognized Jesus as Messiah and Savior must maintain their identity by keeping a certain distance and separation from pagan-Christians.
- New arrivals are received with respect but they create a chill when we see them washing their hands every time they touch a non-Jewish Christian. They refuse any invitation from pagan-Christians and avoid sitting at table with the uncircumcised.
- As we said earlier, Peter until then had adopted the customs of the Christians of Antioch. He accepted invitations, visited families and participated in feasts on the Lord's Day. But as soon as the new delegates from Jerusalem arrived, it began to falter. Let us reread Paul's text on this subject: “When Cephas came to Antioch, I resisted him to his face, because he had proven himself wrong. Indeed, before the arrival of certain people from James' entourage, Peter took his meals with the pagans; but when these people arrived, he was seen to shy away and stand aside, for fear of the circumcised.” (Galatians 2, 12)
- When Judeo-Christians decide to isolate themselves during feasts on Saturday evening, by sitting at separate tables, and they declare to the Antiochians: "If you don't allow yourself to be circumcised, you cannot be saved", the storm broke. We can believe that it was a rather violent scene. That's when Paul steps in. He did it with conviction but also with dignity. He resisted Pierre openly and not slyly, from behind.
- He reminded Peter of what had happened in his own house in Capernaum when Jesus was alive. Tax collectors, sinners and prostitutes stood around Jesus, freely entering his house. Now, by his refusal to eat with the uncircumcised, he was denying his Lord a second time.
- During the community meal (the agape), the establishment of two tables, one for the Jews and another for the non-Jews, constituted a rupture of communion within a community which confessed the same faith and shared the same bread. Paul accuses Peter of wanting to impose dietary rules on non-Jews to take part in meals. Such behavior contradicts the decisions of the assembly in Jerusalem.
- In this dispute, we already find the arguments of the Epistle to the Romans, testament to the thought of Saint Paul. In this letter, he will forcefully repeat that Jews and Gentiles have the same Lord. God does not reject Israel but offers salvation to all human beings and not only to the chosen people.
- The drama of Antioch did not only affect Peter because others had followed his example. The irony is that Barnabas, Paul's friend and companion, was among them. This was, in Paul's eyes, the worst that could happen: "And the other Jews imitated Peter in his dissembling, so that they led Barnabas himself to dissemble with them. But when I saw that they were not walking straight according to the truth of the Gospel, I said to Cephas in front of everyone: "If you who are a Jew, live like the Gentiles, and not like the Jewess, how can do you compel the pagans to Judaize?” (Galatians 2, 13-14)
- After these altercations, the friendship between Paul and Barnabas was broken. Some time later, Paul dismissed Mark from the next mission trip and Barnabas refused to leave without his cousin from Jerusalem. Paul will therefore undertake this second journey with Silas and Barnabas will return to Cyprus in the company of Mark: where they are. But Barnabas also wanted to take John, nicknamed Mark; Paul, on the other hand, was not in favor of taking the one who had abandoned them in Pamphylia and had not been at work with them. They warmed up, and they ended up separating. Barnabas took Mark with him and sailed for Cyprus. For his part, Paul chose Silas and left, after having been entrusted by the brothers to the grace of God. (Acts 15, 36-40)
- Time will restore the old friendship between the three companions. Later, Paul and Barnabas would again enter into a brotherly relationship and share information about their missionary work. As for Mark, the future will prove Barnabas right: he will become a courageous and disinterested man, a precious collaborator for Peter for many years and then for Paul at the end of his life. The fiery apostle of the nations did not hesitate to repair his error. From his prison in Rome, he wrote to the Colossians: “Mark, the cousin of Barnabas, greets you; you have already received orders about it. If he comes to you, welcome him” (Col 4:10). During his last captivity, Paul wrote to Timothy: “Take Mark and bring him with you, for he is of great help to me in my ministry” (2 Tim 4:11). And in his letter to Philemon (1, 23-24): “You have the greetings of Epaphras, my companion in captivity in Christ Jesus, as well as of Mark, Aristarchus, Demas and Luke, my collaborators.
- This is in no way a mistake of Paul!
- He made a decision taking into account certain elements!
- Barnabas made another decision taking into account other elements!
- They decided to separate!
- Time will restore their friendship!
- The important thing is that they maintained their loyalty!
______________________________________________________________________________
25. Confrontation at Antioch
After the Council of Jerusalem, Paul, Barnabas and Titus return to Antioch in Syria. Judas and Silas, the official delegates of the Mother Church, accompany them. Once there, the latter did not hesitate to join not only the Judeo-Christians, but also the Pagan-Christians, which brought happiness to all the members of the Church of Antioch.
A little later, we learn that Peter himself has decided to come and visit them. The news is greeted with great joy by the community. Many have never met the chief apostle, but he enjoys great prestige. Upon his arrival, the Christians show reverence and enthusiasm and they watch Peter's behavior. The members of the Church of Antioch are happy to see the fisherman of Capernaum willingly sharing the meal of the non-Jews. This is an indication for them that the “first council” has borne fruit.
In Jerusalem, however, concern turns to mistrust. The Mother Church, inspired by James, judges that Peter is going too far. New messengers are sent to him to remind him that it is not because some pagans want to become Christians that they are fully part of the people of God. The Jews who recognized Jesus as Messiah and Saviour, must maintain their identity by keeping a certain distance and a certain separation vis-à-vis the pagan-Christians.
Paul openly resisted Peter
The new arrivals are received with respect but they create a chill when we see them washing their hands every time they touch a non-Jewish Christian. They refuse any invitation from pagan-Christians and avoid sitting at table with the uncircumcised.
As we said earlier, Peter until then had adopted the customs of the Christians of Antioch. He accepted invitations, visited families and participated in feasts on the Lord's Day. But as soon as the new delegates from Jerusalem arrived, it began to falter. Let us reread Paul's text on this subject: “When Cephas came to Antioch, I resisted him to his face, because he had proven himself wrong. Indeed, before the arrival of certain people from James' entourage, Peter took his meals with the pagans; but when these people arrived, he was seen to shy away and stand aside, for fear of the circumcised.” (Galatians 2, 12)
When the Judeo-Christians decide to isolate themselves during the Saturday evening feast, by sitting at separate tables, and they declare to the Antiochians: “If you do not allow yourselves to be circumcised, you cannot be saved ", The storm breaks. We can believe that it was a fairly violent scene. That’s when Paul intervenes. He did it with conviction but also with dignity. He resisted Peter openly and not sneakily, from behind.
He reminded Peter of what had happened in his own home in Capernaum when Jesus lived. Tax collectors, sinners and prostitutes stood around Jesus, freely entering his house. Now, by his refusal to eat with the uncircumcised, he denied his Lord a second time.
During the community meal (agape), the establishment of two tables, one for Jews and another for non-Jews, constituted a break in communion within a community which confessed the same faith and shared the same bread. Paul accuses Peter of wanting to impose dietary rules on non-Jews in order to take part in meals. Such behavior contradicts the decisions of the Jerusalem assembly.
In this dispute, we already find the arguments of the Epistle to the Romans, a testament to the thought of Saint Paul. In this letter, he will forcefully repeat that Jews and pagans have the same Lord. God does not reject Israel but offers salvation to all human beings and not only to the chosen people.
The tragedy of Antioch did not only affect Peter because others had followed his example. The irony is that Barnabas, Paul's friend and companion, was among them. It was, in Paul's eyes, the worst that could happen: “And the other Jews imitated Peter in his dissimulation, to the point of dragging Barnabas himself to dissimulate with them. But when I saw that they were not walking uprightly according to the truth of the Gospel, I said to Cephas in the presence of everyone: “If you, being a Jew, live like the Gentiles, and not like a Jew, how can you You force the pagans to Judaize? (Galatians 2, 13-14)
the friendship between Paul and Barnabas was broken
After these altercations, the friendship between Paul and Barnabas was broken. Some time later, Paul excluded Mark from the upcoming missionary journey and Barnabas refused to leave without his cousin from Jerusalem. Paul will therefore undertake this second journey with Silas and Barnabas will return to Cyprus in the company of Mark: “Some time later, Paul said to Barnabas: <let us therefore return to visit the brothers in all the cities where we have proclaimed the word of the Lord, to see where they are. But Barnabas also wanted to take John, nicknamed Mark; Paul was not in favor of taking the one who had abandoned them in Pamphylia and had not been at work with them. We got heated, and ended up separating. Barnabas took Mark with him and sailed for Cyprus. For his part, Paul chose Silas and left, after being entrusted by the brothers to the grace of God. (Acts 15, 36-40)
Time will reestablish the old friendship between the three companions. Later, Paul and Barnabas will again enter into a brotherly relationship and share information about their missionary work. As for Mark, the future will prove Barnabas right: he will become a courageous and selfless man, a precious collaborator for Peter for many years and then for Paul at the end of his life. The fiery apostle of the nations did not hesitate to repair his error. From his prison in Rome, he wrote to the Colossians: “Mark, the cousin of Barnabas, greets you; you have already received orders about it. If he comes to you, welcome him” (Col 4:10). During his last captivity, Paul wrote to Timothy: “Take Mark and bring him with you, for he is of great help to me in the ministry” (2 Tim 4:11). And in his letter to Philemon (1, 23-24): “You have greetings from Epaphras, my companion in captivity in Christ Jesus, as well as from Mark, Aristarchus, Demas and Luke, my collaborators.
The great merit of Paul in Jerusalem and Antioch was to have been able to foresee the serious consequences of the rules to be imposed on new Christians.
The great merit of Paul in Jerusalem and Antioch was to have been able to foresee the serious consequences of the rules to be imposed on new Christians. He does not want them to be forced "to become Jews" in order to join the Christians and he puts an end to the Jewish exaltation of race, considered the only means of attaining justification.
After these incidents in Antioch, Peter disappears from the New Testament accounts. We will only find two epistles which bear his name and which were written after his death.
It is interesting to note the silence of the Acts of the Apostles on the conflicts of Antioch. Luke had certainly heard of it, since he was from this city. But he was a man of peace, aware of his responsibility. His book was published much later, perhaps fifteen years after the confrontation between Peter and Paul. When Luke wrote, the situation had changed. The reconciliation of the two parties had begun. Why reopen old wounds? And that's how Luke delicately passed over this event in silence.
After these controversies, Paul and Silas undertake the second missionary journey. This time they use the land route, while Barnabas and Mark go to the island of Cyprus. We are at the beginning of spring. "Paul, traveling through Syria and Cilicia, was strengthening the churches." (Acts 15, 41) There are already many churches that are flourishing in this region. Paul first visits those he founded on his first trip, before going further west.