KitKatMatt
stupid bleeding heart feminist liberal
Maybe this is how we could solve the problem of the hundreds of thousands of children that are without families right now.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Wouldn't they then need artificial parent technology to raise them afterward?
Did not say they were hypocrites?
Right. And as I pointed out earlier, you missed the point of these protests. Black lives matter as much as white lives. When black kids are being killed, nationwide, by police, without reasonable cause, and nobody is held responsible, the insinuation is that the government doesn't believe black lives matter. The protest is a matter of justice. Protesting at an abortion clinic is not.
Again, put down the FoxNews.
Do you? Do those who protest see the difference?
Since when is calling someone a hypocrite condemning them?
I get that you hate Fox News, but it's not really my goto tank for news, so let's just get that off the table.
I think you fail to realize that white people are killed by cops too, sometimes even when turning a kitten over to a shelter. I get that a higher percentage of blacks are killed.
I see protesting abortion differently than you do.
Also when I fight for justice, I don't see color.
I don't understand the context of your question.
Hmmm...I don't recall seeing any condemnation. Could you point me to it?
I believe that leaving out abortion (and black on black crime) when using a hashtag that states that blacklivesmatter is hypocritical.
That is the summation of my argument. I don't think that's condemning anyone.
I said they should be protesting abortion clinics.
I personally speak out against it because of what I believe it to be. I also know that many people disagree with that. But it's still my belief.
I am very much pro-life, but I realize this is a pro-choice culture. I'd just like to get the women to choose life more often.
claiming someone is a hypocrite is not condemning them. Critical of them yes. Condemning not likely but possible.What do you think condemnation means?
Really? Where did she say that? I think you have put your own spin on what preachers wife said. I disagree with her but I can't see where she made such a claim.Yes, but do you? Afterall, you just told black people they couldn't protest injustice unless they also protested at abortion clinics.
of course not since it made no sense. perhaps some clarification of what you mean would be helpful. I am assuming you are actually interested in discussion.No, I would imagine not.
and your claim is not supported by the article. As I said and you have chosen to ignore for some reason one example does not make it true. If you were honest you would admit that in the reverse situation you would not accept one example as evidence.
When one reads the article then we see further evidence that your claim is false. It was not the shooting that resulted in a law change but an ongoing campaign of advertising and funding by family that caused the change.
You also failed to address the fact that plenty of white people have been killed and the law has not been changed as a result. So yes I am correct in that you are making generalisations without evidence to support them and that Euler is keeping quiet on it. I assume tha reason for that is because you are on the same side of the debate as he is rather than the more sensible position of pointing out flaws in logic no matter who does it.
Since your having trouble with comprehension I will say it again.I'm impressed you can generate so much spin and still remain upright. That must be a great skill to have.
Meanwhile, anyone who isn't trying to prove, well, something, can see the fact is that a police shooting of a white victim gained enough attention to get laws changed. That's a fact that runs counter the the assertion that I was responding to. I have no idea why this idea makes you so uncomfortable, but it isn't my job to figure it out.
I'd like to have a center where low-cost or free baby furniture like cribs and playpens would be available. To me, if women know they have more resources, they will be more likely to decide to keep their baby rather than abort it.
claiming someone is a hypocrite is not condemning them. Critical of them yes. Condemning not likely but possible.
Really? Where did she say that? I think you have put your own spin on what preachers wife said. I disagree with her but I can't see where she made such a claim.
of course not since it made no sense. perhaps some clarification of what you mean would be helpful. I am assuming you are actually interested in discussion.
If you can equate the word hypocritical with condemnation, you're really barking up the wrong tree.
I condemn the actions of the terrorists who shot up the newspaper in France.
Do you see the difference?
If you can equate the word hypocritical with condemnation, you're really barking up the wrong tree.
I condemn the actions of the terrorists who shot up the newspaper in France.
Do you see the difference?
Based on what you've said, no. Do you approve of their protests if they do not protest at abortion clinics?
Not approving doesn't equal condemnation!
con-demn
[kuh n-dem]
verb (used with object)
1. to express an unfavorable or adverse judgment on; indicate strong disapproval of; censure.
claiming someone is a hypocrite is not condemning them. Critical of them yes. Condemning not likely but possible.
You did not express unfavorable or adverse judgment on these protesters? You did not indicate strong disapproval of their "hypocrisy"?
PreachersWife said:Never once in their campaign do they even address what else is killing black people. NEVER ONCE do they talk about how THEIR OWN PEOPLE ARE KILLING EACH OTHER OFF - moreso than any police. THEY IGNORE THE STATISTICS, AND CHOOSE TO INSTEAD ATTACK POLICE OFFICERS WHO HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO BE DOING THEIR JOB.
Never mind that MOST of these guys that are killed by police were BREAKING THE LAW. Never mind that most of them were ATTACKING THE POLICE OFFICER. Oh, no...IT MUST BE RACISM BECAUSE IT'S A BLACK PERSON GETTING SHOT.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?