• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Logical Problems with Calvinism

Status
Not open for further replies.

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
For the purposes of debate a person defending Calvinist dogmas would be considered a Calvinist give the title of this thread.

That is not slander. Labels mean something.
I have no real problem with what you say above.

I want it known that I differ on the 5 points in various way in so far as the way I would explain them.

But, in so far as I have taken it upon myself to defend what Calvinists and I have in common - I can live without anyone having qualify my nuanced beliefs every time they debate Calvinist doctrine with me.
 
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,818
✟368,235.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
For the purposes of debate a person defending Calvinist dogmas would be considered a Calvinist give the title of this thread.

That is not slander. Labels mean something.
Not when you are calling people who have said more than once they ARE NOT a Calvinist and you keep calling them a Calvinist.

That is confusion and inaccuracy. Are you not listening? Because we all have read it once and more than once.

Labels mean something to the person doing the labeling and many times that is different than what the person reading the label understands.
 
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Unconditional Election:
God does not base His election on anything He sees in the individual. He chooses the elect according to the kind intention of His will without any consideration of merit within the individual. Nor does God look into the future to see who would pick Him. Also, as some are elected into salvation, others are not .

What does God base his election on?
It is based on what will glorify Him most in the long run as He displays His mercy and grace along with His justice and wrath in the ages to come according to the council of His perfect will.

He made the decision of exactly what will do that best, as He displays His perfect knowledge of good and evil in this age and in the ages to come - long before any of us were brought into existence.

Again - it could have nothing to do with what we do since we would not even exist and thus could do absolutely nothing unless He wills it so. Before the foundation of the world there was no "we" to do anything.

He brings about what He has predestined and decreed to take place in His creation through the laws of nature that He has subjected His creation to. That includes the "free will" actions of his creatures influenced mightily by our natures.

Our fallen nature will act certain ways when confronted with the holiness of God. Our new nature will act certain ways when confronted with the holiness of God.

It is in this realm where the doctrine of so called irresistible grace comes into play.

Only He can create a new nature.

No sinner deserves to have Him create in that sinner a new nature. It is strictly His decision as to for whom He will do that.

Guilty sinners have no complaint if He chooses to do that for one and pass the other by. They are no less culpable for their sins if He does that then if He did not.

As rebellious creatures under the just wrath of God , we deserve nothing but Hell.

If you are indeed saved - I advise you to take your free gift and praise God for it rather than spending your time judging why He gave it to you and passed someone else by.

You can't possibly understand the wisdom of your creator.

Assuming that you are saved - you will spend eternity learning about His infinite knowledge and wisdom and then only scratch the surface.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: GillDouglas
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,818
✟368,235.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
You say you are not a Calvinists, so I guess you are unfamiliar with what they teach:

Unconditional Election:
God does not base His election on anything He sees in the individual. He chooses the elect according to the kind intention of His will without any consideration of merit within the individual. Nor does God look into the future to see who would pick Him. Also, as some are elected into salvation, others are not .

Ok, I'll bite.

How do you explain the 20 verses that say we are saved through God's grace through FAITH?

How does the happy Calvinist get passed the fact that EACH human being must come to Him in faith?

Note: The words specifically say "come to Him" because we must come to Him IN FAITH, WITH FAITH.
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,904
...
✟1,317,383.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The Bible plainly says all men are sinners. Not "were" sinners, as you suppose.

Actually, that is not true. God's Word does say that we used to be sinners in the past. For the Scriptures say,

"Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others." (Ephesians 2:2-3).

"Who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness. But ye have not so learned Christ; If so be that ye have heard him, and have been taught by him, as the truth is in Jesus: That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts; And be renewed in the spirit of your mind; And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness." (Ephesians 4:19-24).

" And although you were formerly alienated and hostile in mind, engaged in evil deeds, yet He has now reconciled you in His fleshly body through death, in order to present you before Him holy and blameless and beyond reproach— if indeed you continue in the faith firmly established and steadfast, and not moved away from the hope of the gospel that you have heard, which was proclaimed in all creation under heaven, and of which I, Paul, was made a minister." (Colossians 1:21-23). (New American Standard).

"Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth: fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness which is idolatry. Because of these, the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience, in which ye also once walked, when ye lived in them. But now ye also put off all these: anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy communication out of your mouth. Do not lie one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds, and have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of Him that created him." (Colossians 3:5-10). (21st Century King James).

"Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ; As obedient children, not fashioning yourselves according to the former lusts in your ignorance: But as he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation; Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy." (1 Peter 1:13-16).

We confess in order to be cleansed.

What does 1 John 1:9 say we are ceansed of? Unrighteousness. 1 John 5:17 says all unrighteousness is sin. So we are cleansed of sin. This makes sense because 1 John 1:9 says if we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins. So one is saved if they confess. For forgiveness and salvation are tied together.

"In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace." (Ephesians 1:7).

"In whom we have redemption through his blood, that is, the forgiveness of sins." (Colossians 1:14) (Geneva Bible)

And as Jesus had to teach ol' Peter in John 13, even though he was "clean", meaning saved, he still needed his feet cleaned to have fellowship with Jesus. Otherwise, Peter could have "no part" with Jesus. That's about fellowship obviously.

No. The outward cleaning was symbolic of their inward condition of being clean. For Jesus said there is one among them who is not clean (i.e. Judas).

I just told you. From the Bible. 1 Jn 1:9.

I still have no idea what confession serves for you. You said one is cleansed. But of what thing is a person being cleansed of?

What is it about the words "immediately" and some point in the future" that aren't clear enough that they aren't equated at all? That's the continuing hang up that you present.

Your missing the point. It does not matter if a believer sins immediately after they confessed or if they sin at some point in the far future. If they say they are going to be a slave to sin in some way the rest of their life, they are making excuses that they will sin. God cannot condone such thinking because He would have to be a party to such wrong thinking on sin; And that is just not possible.

In Jesus' day, foot washing wasn't symbolic. It was functional. Animals shared the roads and paths with humans. So people got FECES all over their feet when they walked the roads and paths.

If you lived at that time, would you want anyone to track any of that stuff into your home? Hm? Of course not. You'd have a servant clean the feet of all visitors.

So, even though one would have had a bath before visiting, their feet would still need to be cleaned before entering the home for the purpose of fellowship. That was Jesus' point to Peter and the rest.

Jesus said his words are spirit and they are life. There was never a time that He did not speak without it having a spiritual meaning attached to it.

I've explained this thoroughly. There is nothing more that I can do. But go ahead and knock yourself out with the most outlandish scenarios you can think of.

I have not provided outlandish scenarios. I have provided real world examples or parables just as Jesus had done.

But since you do bring up extreme scenarios, it only shows that the real person that has been offended is you. And you don't want anyone to get away with anything. You want them in hell, right?

This is just false slander. No. I do not wish any evil upon anyone. I also do not believe hell is a place of eternal torment. I believe it is more like a really bad prison and in time after the Judgment, all the wicked in hell will be erased from existence in the Lake of Fire. Evil will come to an end.

Well, God has a different plan for mankind. The plan is based on GRACE, something that the conditional security ilk have no idea about

The Conditional Salvationist understands Biblical grace just fine. They just do not prescribe to OSAS's version of grace that condones sin in some way.

I've already shown the verses that teach that Christ died for all sin once for all.

And I provided the context for you so as to show you that it is not what you think it says.

So even when a child of God sins after being saved, that sin was already covered by Christ's sacrifice.

It seems you're understanding of what the OT sacrifices were for is lacking.

The difference between the OT sacrifices and Christ's perfect sacrifice is that the OT sacrifice never took away past sin for good. They had to keep revisiting the same past sins each year. But with Jesus's perfect sacrifice, all past sin is forever forgiven. But just like in the Old Covenant, if one sins again, they both need to confess their sin so as to maintain their right standing with God.

"He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?" (Hebrews 10:28-29).


...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Actually, that is not true. God's Word does say that we used to be sinners in the past. ...
No - you are wrong.

You aren't even close to being right in so far as the scriptures testify about us at this present time.

It does not say that we "used to be" sinners in the past.

The scriptures speak in the present tense concerning what we do and what we now are.

"For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.

If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.

Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwells in me.

For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwells no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.

For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.

Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwells in me.

I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.

For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:

But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?

I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin." Romans 7:15-27

If you feel that you simply must try to undermine the eternal security of believers - please drop this bankrupt idea that believers are no longer sinners and just move on to other avenues of argumentation.

The Godly thing to do is to admit that you are wrong in some of the things you have said and try another approach.

So long as you continue to fight for an idea that is clearly not scriptural, you show yourself to be prideful and unwilling to simply say that you were wrong in some of the things you have said.

The right thing to do would be to just own up to your mistakes and move on.

That shouldn't be very difficult for a true child of God IMO (which, frankly, makes me wonder about you and your relationship with the Holy Spirit.)

Repent and trust in the finished work of Jesus Christ for your eternal salvation - and you will receive the Holy Spirit who will convict you of these sins that you are committing here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: nobdysfool
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,904
...
✟1,317,383.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
No - you are wrong.

You aren't even close to being right in so far as the scriptures testify about us at this present time.

It does not say that we "used to be" sinners in the past.

The scriptures speak in the present tense concerning what we do and what we now are.

"For that which I do I allow not: for what I would, that do I not; but what I hate, that do I.

If then I do that which I would not, I consent unto the law that it is good.

Now then it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwells in me.

For I know that in me (that is, in my flesh,) dwells no good thing: for to will is present with me; but how to perform that which is good I find not.

For the good that I would I do not: but the evil which I would not, that I do.

Now if I do that I would not, it is no more I that do it, but sin that dwells in me.

I find then a law, that, when I would do good, evil is present with me.

For I delight in the law of God after the inward man:

But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind, and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in my members.

O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death?

I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God; but with the flesh the law of sin." Romans 7:15-27

If you feel that you simply must try to undermine the eternal security of believers - please drop this bankrupt idea that believers are no longer sinners and just move on to other avenues of argumentation.

The Godly thing to do is to admit that you are wrong in some of the things you have said and try another approach.

So long as you continue to fight for an idea that is clearly not scriptural, you show yourself to be prideful and unwilling to simply say that you were wrong in some of the things you have said.

The right thing to do would be to just own up to your mistakes and move on.

That shouldn't be very difficult for a true child of God IMO (which, frankly, makes me wonder about you and your relationship with the Holy Spirit.)

Repent and trust in the finished work of Jesus Christ for your eternal salvation - and you will receive the Holy Spirit who will convict you of these sins that you are committing here.
No. I enlarged the words (and just recently colored them in red) to help everyone here to see. So there is no room for misunderstanding. The passages are clear in what they say. Anyone who reads these passages plainly (with no preconceived ideas), can easily understand it's message. Words like "IN TIMES PAST" and "FORMERLY" and "ONCE WALKED" when talking about lusts or sins is speaking of the past. You simply do not want to see it because it does not agree with your sin and still be saved type belief, my friend.

Anyways, may God's love and peace shine upon you.
And please be well.


...
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I said this:
" Salvation itself is the gift. As well, eternal life itself is a gift of God. Rom 6:23, 2 Cor 9:15


Please cite any verse that actually says that man can give away or give back his gift of eternal life/salvation."
Matthew 10:22
You will be hated by everyone because of me, but the one who stands firm to the end will be saved.
If one checks the context (v.23), one realizes that the subject is the Tribulation. This verse has NO application in general terms.

Luke 21:19
Stand firm, and you will win life.
Just like the previous verse, the context here is STILL about the Tribulation (v.20).

Heb 3:14
We have come to share in Christ, if indeed we hold our original conviction firmly to the very end.
The Greek word for "share" means to 'partner'. Which connotes fellowship. This is NOT about loss of salvation.

Romans 11:22
Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you, provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off.
The agricultural metaphor teaches about either being useful to God (as Israel thought they were) or being unuseful and discarded. Again, NOT about loss of salvation.

John 15
6If you do not remain in me, you are like a branch that is thrown away and withers; such branches are picked up, thrown into the fire and burned...10If you keep my commands, you will remain in my love,
Another agrucultural metaphor about being useful or not. And the phrase "remain in Me" refers again to fellowship, NOT relationship.

Once again, another list that does NOT teach that man is able to give back or give away his salvation.

How would one give away his eternal life, his justification, his forgiveness, his status as a son of God? Impossible. And there are no examples of such a thing in Scripture.

Your list failed.
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
No. I enlarged the words (and just recently colored them in red) to help everyone here to see. So there is no room for misunderstanding. The passages are clear in what they say. Anyone who reads these passages plainly (with no preconceived ideas), can easily understand it's message. Words like "IN TIMES PAST" and "FORMERLY" and "ONCE WALKED" when talking about lusts or sins is speaking of the past. You simply do not want to see it because it does not agree with your sin and still be saved type belief, my friend.

Anyways, may God's love and peace shine upon you.
And please be well.


...
Those who read these passages realize that Paul is noting their former lifestyles as unbelievers and admonishing believers to NOT continue to live like that.

For example: "So this I say, and affirm together with the Lord, that you walk no longer just as the Gentiles also walk, in the futility of their mind," Eph 4:17.

iow, believers are to stop living like unbelievers. The exact SAME word is used in Acts 4:17 when the Pharisees told the disciples to "speak no longer to anyone in this name". iow, they WERE speaking to others in the name of Christ. And the Pharisees ordered them to STOP IT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marvin Knox
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Actually, that is not true. God's Word does say that we used to be sinners in the past. For the Scriptures say,

"Wherein in time past ye walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit that now worketh in the children of disobedience: Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind; and were by nature the children of wrath, even as others." (Ephesians 2:2-3).

"Who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness. But ye have not so learned Christ; If so be that ye have heard him, and have been taught by him, as the truth is in Jesus: That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts; And be renewed in the spirit of your mind; And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness." (Ephesians 4:19-24).

" And although you were formerly alienated and hostile in mind, engaged in evil deeds, yet He has now reconciled you in His fleshly body through death, in order to present you before Him holy and blameless and beyond reproach— if indeed you continue in the faith firmly established and steadfast, and not moved away from the hope of the gospel that you have heard, which was proclaimed in all creation under heaven, and of which I, Paul, was made a minister." (Colossians 1:21-23). (New American Standard).

"Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth: fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness which is idolatry. Because of these, the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience, in which ye also once walked, when ye lived in them. But now ye also put off all these: anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy communication out of your mouth. Do not lie one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds, and have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of Him that created him." (Colossians 3:5-10). (21st Century King James).

"Wherefore gird up the loins of your mind, be sober, and hope to the end for the grace that is to be brought unto you at the revelation of Jesus Christ; As obedient children, not fashioning yourselves according to the former lusts in your ignorance: But as he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation; Because it is written, Be ye holy; for I am holy." (1 Peter 1:13-16).



What does 1 John 1:9 say we are ceansed of? Unrighteousness. 1 John 5:17 says all unrighteousness is sin. So we are cleansed of sin. This makes sense because 1 John 1:9 says if we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins. So one is saved if they confess. For forgiveness and salvation are tied together.

"In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace." (Ephesians 1:7).

"In whom we have redemption through his blood, that is, the forgiveness of sins." (Colossians 1:14) (Geneva Bible)



No. The outward cleaning was symbolic of their inward condition of being clean. For Jesus said there is one among them who is not clean (i.e. Judas).



I still have no idea what confession serves for you. You said one is cleansed. But of what thing is a person being cleansed of?



Your missing the point. It does not matter if a believer sins immediately after they confessed or if they sin at some point in the far future. If they say they are going to be a slave to sin in some way the rest of their life, they are making excuses that they will sin. God cannot condone such thinking because He would have to be a party to such wrong thinking on sin; And that is just not possible.



Jesus said his words are spirit and they are life. There was never a time that He did not speak without it having a spiritual meaning attached to it.



I have not provided outlandish scenarios. I have provided real world examples or parables just as Jesus had done.



This is just false slander. No. I do not wish any evil upon anyone. I also do not believe hell is a place of eternal torment. I believe it is more like a really bad prison and in time after the Judgment, all the wicked in hell will be erased from existence in the Lake of Fire. Evil will come to an end.



The Conditional Salvationist understands Biblical grace just fine. They just do not prescribe to OSAS's version of grace that condones sin in some way.



And I provided the context for you so as to show you that it is not what you think it says.



The difference between the OT sacrifices and Christ's perfect sacrifice is that the OT sacrifice never took away past sin for good. They had to keep revisiting the same past sins each year. But with Jesus's perfect sacrifice, all past sin is forever forgiven. But just like in the Old Covenant, if one sins again, they both need to confess their sin so as to maintain their right standing with God.

"He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses: Of how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?" (Hebrews 10:28-29)....
You've yet failed to explain how God's gifts, which are irrevocable (Rom 11:29) and include eternal life (Rom 6:23) can be lost.

You've yet failed to explain how God's "own possession", who has been sealed with the Holy Spirit of PROMISE, a GUARANTEE for the day of redemption, can end up not seeing the day of redemption.

Until you do, it is only very obvious that ALL of the verses you post cannot mean what you think they mean. None of them.

So, get back to the drawing board and figure out how one who has received the free gift of eternal life (Rom 6:23), which is also irrevocable (Rom 11:29), can lose it.

Then, after proving that an irrevocable gift can be lost or revoked (I don't care how one phrases it) figure out how any of God's own possession who has been sealed for the day of redemption, which is described as a promise and guarantee, won't see the day of redemption.

Only after you've done that should anyone even bother to consider your opinions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marvin Knox
Upvote 0

Thursday

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
6,034
1,562
60
Texas
✟56,929.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I have no real problem with what you say above.

I want it known that I differ on the 5 points in various way in so far as the way I would explain them.

But, in so far as I have taken it upon myself to defend what Calvinists and I have in common - I can live without anyone having qualify my nuanced beliefs every time they debate Calvinist doctrine with me.

Sounds good!

Could it be that your understanding of Unconditional Election and Irresistible Grace is different than that of a true Five Points Calvinist?
 
Upvote 0

Thursday

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
6,034
1,562
60
Texas
✟56,929.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
He brings about what He has predestined and decreed to take place in His creation through the laws of nature that He has subjected His creation to. That includes the "free will" actions of his creatures influenced mightily by our natures.

If this is true, then it is God's fault when a man goes to Hell because that man had no opportunity for salvation from birth.

Thankfully, that is not consistent with scripture. God wants ALL men to be saved. Those who aren't saved cannot blame God.

Ezekiel 18:32
For I take no pleasure in the death of anyone, declares the Sovereign LORD. Repent and live!

1 Timothy 2:4
who wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.

2 Peter 3:9
The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance.

Titus 2:11
For the grace of God has appeared that offers salvation to all people.

1 Timothy 4:10
That is why we labor and strive, because we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all people, and especially of those who believe.
 
Upvote 0

Thursday

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
6,034
1,562
60
Texas
✟56,929.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Ok, I'll bite.

How do you explain the 20 verses that say we are saved through God's grace through FAITH?

How does the happy Calvinist get passed the fact that EACH human being must come to Him in faith?

Note: The words specifically say "come to Him" because we must come to Him IN FAITH, WITH FAITH.

We are saved by faith, but not faith alone, as scripture points out in dozens of passages. We will be judged for our actions, including prayer, confession, evil deeds and good works.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Thursday

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
6,034
1,562
60
Texas
✟56,929.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
You've yet failed to explain how God's gifts, which are irrevocable (Rom 11:29) and include eternal life (Rom 6:23) can be lost.

God's gift is the grace that leads to eternal life. He will not withdraw this gift, but neither will he stop us from rejecting it or accepting it then throwing it away.

That's why we must be careful not to shipwreck our faith through sin.
 
Upvote 0

Thursday

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
6,034
1,562
60
Texas
✟56,929.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I said this:
" Salvation itself is the gift. As well, eternal life itself is a gift of God. Rom 6:23, 2 Cor 9:15


Please cite any verse that actually says that man can give away or give back his gift of eternal life/salvation."

If one checks the context (v.23), one realizes that the subject is the Tribulation. This verse has NO application in general terms.


Just like the previous verse, the context here is STILL about the Tribulation (v.20).


The Greek word for "share" means to 'partner'. Which connotes fellowship. This is NOT about loss of salvation.


The agricultural metaphor teaches about either being useful to God (as Israel thought they were) or being unuseful and discarded. Again, NOT about loss of salvation.


Another agrucultural metaphor about being useful or not. And the phrase "remain in Me" refers again to fellowship, NOT relationship.

Once again, another list that does NOT teach that man is able to give back or give away his salvation.

How would one give away his eternal life, his justification, his forgiveness, his status as a son of God? Impossible. And there are no examples of such a thing in Scripture.

Your list failed.


Quite remarkable. You simply dismiss the verses that prove you wrong. I wonder if there is a psychological term for this?
 
Upvote 0

tulipbee

Worker of the Hive
Apr 27, 2006
2,835
297
✟25,849.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
God's gift is the grace that leads to eternal life. He will not withdraw this gift, but neither will he stop us from rejecting it or accepting it then throwing it away.

That's why we must be careful not to shipwreck our faith through sin.
Why would God want to stop us if he knows we'll reject? You're saying he doesn't know and hopes for it.
 
Upvote 0

Thursday

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
6,034
1,562
60
Texas
✟56,929.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Why would God want to stop us if he knows we'll reject? You're saying he doesn't know and hopes for it.

God is just. He let's us choose.

Do you believe that God is just?

Do you believe that God wanted Adam and Eve to sin?
 
Upvote 0

Thursday

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
6,034
1,562
60
Texas
✟56,929.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Where do we see god when we chose?

God's grace reaches out to all of us. We see him at work in the world an in our lives.

Romans 1:20
For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse.

Titus 2:11
For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men,
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
We are saved by faith, but not faith alone, as scripture points out in dozens of passages.
Actually, not. There is only 1 verse about justification being "not by faith alone". However, what is clear is that James' focus in ch 2 is on how others view us. And because of 2:18 which shows that the ONLY WAY others can see our faith is by our deeds, the justification in 2:24 isn't from God's perspective, but the perspective of others.

Beyond that, there are NO verses that salvation is based on anything other than faith.

We will be judged for our actions, including prayer, confession, evil deeds and good works.
Yes, 2 Cor 5:10 says so. But where in that passage do we read that salvation is based on any of these things?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.