• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Logical Problems with Calvinism

Status
Not open for further replies.

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I said this:
"I thought I had made it very clear that I don't make analogies, parables or metaphors to "illustrate spiritual truth". I just go directly to the Source, which seems to have no sway with you. I quote from the Bible when I want to show spiritual truth."
Then you are not following the example of Jesus and what He did.
Jesus never commanded that any of His disciples speak in parables. And I've already shown you WHY He did in the first place. And it wasn't for those who wanted the truth. It was for those who didn't want the truth. Just like what you've indicated.

You also would have to ignore the Canaanite's woman of making an analogy, as well. For what? What reason do you have really? Well, I have a few theories.
We'll dispense with all of your theories. Not worth it. And neither she nor Jesus made any analogy.

Well, I believe it is relevant because if one believes in such a way, they are using it as a way to prevent them in seeing Conditional Salvation in the Scriptures.
The Bible does NOT teach conditional salvation. Eternal life is a free gift of God (Rom 6:23). And God's gifts are irrevocable (Rom 11:29). Get used to it.

Are you a Mid Acts Dispensationalist?
No. And irrelevant, as far as I can see.

And I have proven from Scriptures that you are taking verses out of context to show such a thing.
No, you've only said that you have. An opinion is not a refutation.

The sad thing here is God has not revealed what you think is truth. And none of these verses support conditional salvation in any way. But I do understand that you think they do.
 
Reactions: ToBeLoved
Upvote 0

tulipbee

Worker of the Hive
Apr 27, 2006
2,835
297
✟25,849.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Been there done that, babble subjectlessly away
 
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,908
...
✟1,319,306.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Nope. Paul clearly indicated it in Romans 7, a chapter that it seems you're totally unwilling to face.

But if your interpretation is true, then Paul contradicted himself when he said he was sold under sin in Romans 7:14 and yet he was free from sin in Romans 8:2.

And John clearly indicated it in 1 Jn 1:8 and 10.

Again, this does not mean what you think it says. It cannot mean to say that we will have sin always in our life because 1 John 2:4 refutes such a notion. For he that does not keep his commandments and says he knows him is a liar and the truth is not in him.

The phrase "sin still be saved doctrine" is an obvious suggestion that sin causes loss of salvation. Which is unbiblical.

No it's not. Sin has always been a loss of separation between God and man (Which began for man with his one act of disobedience in the Garden of Eden).

Sin cannot separate us from God because Christ died for all our sins.

No. The Bible does not say future sin is paid for. On the contrary, Hebrews 10:26 says if we willfully sin after having received the knowledge of the truth, there remains no more sacrifice for sin. 1 John 1:9 says we have to confess sin in order to be forgiven of sin. 1 John 1:7 says we have to walk in the light as he is in the light in order for the blood of Jesus to cleanse us from all sin. Proverbs 28:13 says we have to confess and forsake sin in order to have mercy. So no. You are wrong.

And you have failed to deal with that truth. When will you?

You are the one who is failing to see what the Scriptures are plainly saying. If what you say is true, then the Pharisees should have been saved. But Jesus said they were hypocrites and they lived a hypocrital and sinful life.

Rom 6 was written to and applies to believers.

And you do not understand what Romans 6 says. Paul clearly says shall we continue in sin so that grace may abound? Paul's answer to that question is "God forbid." He then says yield yourselves to whom ye obey. Whether it be sin unto death or obedience unto righteousness. Two kingdoms being described here because God is not of the kingdom of sin and death. The devil is of that kingdom.

You've still failed to prove that man can become sinless during this life.

No. I have proved it very clearly by God's Word. You are simply not wanting to see what the Scriptures plainly say. 1 Peter 4:1, Galatians 5:24, and many others refute your belief. Jesus said to two people to: "sin no more."

otoh, you have been accused correctly. And those who have accused you are correct.

The Scriptures say, be not deceived. Whatsoever a man sows that shall he also reap.

Here's again where you're off track. Truth is determined ONLY by what Scripture says. The "real world" has nothing to do with truth.

What? God made the real world and the universe. He is the creator everything you see around you. The Lord also made analogies to illustrate spiritual truth based on truths in the real world.


So Jesus's parables and other analogies are a deception?

What makes anyone think I don't do that daily?

Because if you honestly did so sincerily, you would not believe what you do now.

Stop judging what you obviously have no clue about.

I have been talking against Calvinism and OSAS for many years now. Yes, you do not believe in Calvinism, but that is where OSAS comes from. Well, actually a form of OSAS existed even during the Bible times. John wrote an epistle about such a deception for a believer to think "sin does not exist for them" on a spiritual level.

None of this proves or concludes that one can become sinless. You yourself have admitted that you haven't become sinless. Does that mean you're not saved? Remember post #2344?

I believe Samson, Solomon, and the thief on the cross were saved. As I said before it is a mental attitude towards sin. Do you believe you can overcome sin and conquer it with Jesus' help? This will lead a believer into paths to righteousness for his name sake. If a believer is walking in holiness on their road to recovery by the Spirit, there is no Condemnation. But if a believer makes excuses for sin by saying they will forever sin, then they are believing in a sin and still be saved doctrine (Which is wrong).

This is nonsense. I'm not nor have ever defending "man to live in sin". For any length of time.

Yes you are. You yourself said it is impossible for a beleiver to stop sinning. So this gives the believer the green light to sin on occasion. Yes, you believe a believer should strive to live holy and to repent of sin, etc. But that doesn't mean anything if one thinks they will just forever sin in this life. It's making an allowance for evil. It is having the wrong attitude towards sin.

Your problem is how you take an idea and then twist it all out of shape into something it is not.

Not true at all.

I have been clear. Believers will never be sinless during their life on earth. But believers are to sin less.

Which is teaching man to sin.


And you are missing the most important verse in there. Galatians 5:24 says they that are Christ's have crucified the affections and lusts.


....
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Bible Highlighter

Law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
Site Supporter
Jul 22, 2014
41,685
7,908
...
✟1,319,306.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Haven't you made it quite clear that you'd rather deal with stories than Scripture???
The use of parables and or analogies in Scripture were made as an example by our Lord. Even the Canaanite woman had made such examples.


...
 
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Everything that you said fits in properly with what Job8 used in his parable.

His parable told of the many negative consequences that ensued because of the man's abuse of his new heart. It just stopped short of what you teach. You teach that, because a man abuses his new heart, the surgeon revisits him, cuts him open and takes the new heart away from him for abusing it.

In this respect my parable was much like Job8's parable in that it told of great loss to men for abusing their new found life. But, like mine, it stopped short of saying that God would (in my parable) disown him or (in Job8's parable) take his heart away.

You've asked (even demanded) parables from everyone that told what they believed and how it makes perfect sense. That's two people now who have gone to the trouble of accommodating you. You have rejected each one's view as, of course, you would.

But each parable was better than the one that your theology would teach. They both make a lot more sense than yours would theologically IMO.

And (I'm thinking) in the opinion of almost everyone participating in this thread with the probable exception of EmSw - and most of us know where he comes from.

Under your profile - you list your ministry as an "Anti-OSAS Evangelist". IMO you need to knock off your evangelical agenda of undermining the faith of others and concentrate a little more on working on your own faith.

(Or should I say lack of faith?) You certainly have no faith in the finished work of Jesus Christ on behalf of believers.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: nobdysfool
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
In your parable the alcoholic is thrown out of the class be the teacher if he slips.

Every one who enters an AA group does so with the hope and prayer that he will achieve long range and even permanent sobriety.

Everyone who enters the Kingdom of God and into a real relationship with the Holy Spirit does so with the hope and prayer that he will achieve long range and even permanent victory over sin.

But, much like your alcoholic illustration, an alcoholic remains an alcoholic for life and says so at every meeting.

He who will not admit to being an alcoholic every time he is introduced at an AA meeting is called on it by the teacher and the others in the group as well.

He who says that he has no sin is a liar. That verse is both God, the leader of the group, and the rest of the group as well who are calling you on your false doctrine.
 
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
................... To open the heart suggests providing understanding. Which is the ministry of the Holy Spirit in conviction. But opening a heart for understanding doesn't always result in a proper response.
The heart of a person is the spirit of the person. The Holy Spirit, as I see it, convicts at a spirit level.

If that is true as I believe it is - then the spirit of the individual and the Holy Spirit are in contact and communicating in some way. That, as I see it, is the very definition of spiritual life.

Of course - as I have said - I don't view what most call regeneration as a single instantaneous act but as a process where by the spirit and mind of a man is washed and renewed by the act of the Holy Spirit renewing the mind through His working in the spirit of the man. This is just as the one verse we have that mentions regeneration tells it IMO.

I believe that most people have a rather simplistic idea of what it means to have life given to us by God. Jesus said that His words were truth and they were "life". The Word is ministered to men by the Holy Spirit over a lifetime of growth and it doesn't only apply to that one immediate act where man first is brought into contact with the Spirit of God as I see it.

I believe that this rather simplistic view that most people on both sides of the issues we face have concerning "life" as God defines it is responsible for much of the debate between Calvinists and non-Calvinists and with those who teach this on again off again salvation (those who teach against the doctrine of the eternal security of believers).

That's probably about as clear as mud to some here and maybe to you as well. But then it's a big subject and takes more that a few sentences to lay it out properly.
............ But opening a heart for understanding doesn't always result in a proper response.
Much as with the doctrine of limited atonement - I take issue somewhat with the way irresistable grace is taught by some or even most Calvinists.

In fact I would have caveats concerning the way every one of the 5 points are often taught. If I got to word the doctrines myself - I would be a 5 pointer. But how often does a person get to do that? Certainly this forum format makes it difficult.

And yet - as you well know - I believe in the absolute sovereignty of God in all things. That means that I get branded a Calvinist usually. I can live with that fact - but not without being given the time to flesh things out a little more that T.U.L.I.P. allows for.
...I think that's how these forums generally work.
These forums do have their limitations though, don't they? Maybe I need to write a book. Of course someone here will likely tell me that I usually do whenever I make a long post.
 
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Suffice it to say that I disagree with you on what several verses that you often use teach. Let' not go through them again here. We've already done it a dozen time or so before this.
 
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
As you've been told many times - you understanding of Calvinist doctrine is deficient.

Total depravity simply means that there is not a facet of fallen man's being that is not effected in some way by sin.

Ask - rather than - state what Calvinism teaches. You are much more likely to not misrepresent them with your errors concerning what their doctrines are.

Any chance you'll repent of your constant misrepresentation of what your brothers and sisters teach?

It's important that you do. You will answer for it you know?

"Let not many of you become teachers, my brethren, knowing that as such we will incur a stricter judgment."
James 3:1
 
Last edited:
Reactions: nobdysfool
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
TIn the Scriptures, the Prodigal Son had eaten with the hogs during his time of riotious and sinful living. When the son returned to the father, he said his son was once dead and is now alive again "twice." ...
You have an extremely shallow conception of what God means by "dead" and "alive".
 
Reactions: ToBeLoved
Upvote 0

ToBeLoved

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 3, 2014
18,705
5,818
✟368,235.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
You have an extremely shallow conception of what God means by "dead" and "alive".
What I have found is that many people are so much into intellectual understanding (which is often incorrect without spiritual thought) rather than in conjunction with the Spirit and spiritual things. What it really shows is lack of trust in God to guide our lives and to take that step close to the edge of the mountain, knowing that He will not let us fall. It is a shame for many to miss out on all God offers us.

What you have seen as well as myself, FreeGrace2 and countless others on this thread is that there is a spiritual insight that is missing, not on one issue, or two or three but over and over. Somehow, those who have the Holy Spirit pick up no spirituality or spiritual connection to scripture. I have NEVER found that to be true. To love God is to be motivated by that love and that is mostly spiritual.

If I was in this situation I would be praying often for spiritual insight and hearing everyone who shared spiritual insight, but what it goes to show is action and searching for the fullness of God can only be found when one listens and learns.

It's too bad. I agree with your statement above. One has to be open to the Holy Spirit's teaching because the Holy Spirit does not hit one over the head with a frying pan. In love the Holy Spirit teaches and teaches much more those who seek Him and spirituality.
 
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
I have been talking against Calvinism and OSAS for many years now.....
That's a whole lot of false teaching.

I wouldn't be in your sandals on the day you stand before the Judgment Seat to answer for what you've taught as a teacher for all the manna in Heaven.
 
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
The rejection of the truth we have in the scriptures has a snowball effect on false teachers. There is an active principle concerning how God deals with people in the stewardship that comes into play in spiritual matters just as there is in financial matters.

Concerning Jason, I would say that he is living proof of what Jesus told us about how the Holy Spirit deals with those who fight against the truth.

"So take care how you listen; for whoever has, to him more shall be given; and whoever does not have, even what he thinks he has shall be taken away from him." Luke 8:18 and Matthew 4:25
 
Reactions: nobdysfool
Upvote 0

Marvin Knox

Senior Veteran
May 9, 2014
4,291
1,454
✟92,138.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Which is one of the reasons I disagree with Arminianism.
It might be way too big a subject to tackle.

But, if it's possible without hijacking the thread, could you give us the very short version of how what you call Free Grace theology differs from the most common Arminian theology?

Forget for now how it differs from Calvinist theology. I'm not looking for a debate about your theology here - just a quick sketch to refresh me and fill others in a little.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Thursday

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
6,034
1,562
60
Texas
✟56,929.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
In what way?

Like this:

8Whoever sows to please their flesh, from the flesh will reap destruction; whoever sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life. 9Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.
 
Upvote 0

Thursday

Well-Known Member
Jan 12, 2016
6,034
1,562
60
Texas
✟56,929.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married

True, but this grace is given to all men. Some choose to reject it.

Titus 2:11
For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men,

Acts 17:30
In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent.

Ezekiel 18:32
For I take no pleasure in the death of anyone, declares the Sovereign LORD. Repent and live!

1 Timothy 2:4
who wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.
 
Reactions: ToBeLoved
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I said this:
" Paul clearly indicated it in Romans 7, a chapter that it seems you're totally unwilling to face."
But if your interpretation is true, then Paul contradicted himself when he said he was sold under sin in Romans 7:14 and yet he was free from sin in Romans 8:2.
Then please show HOW. Just making such a statement doesn't prove anything. Prove your claim.

You really aren't following what others are saying, are you? I NEVER said "always have sin in our life". My point has been clear and consistent: when the believer spiritually grows in grace, they will sin less. That's not "sin always in our life".

No it's not. Sin has always been a loss of separation between God and man (Which began for man with his one act of disobedience in the Garden of Eden).
Unbelievers are separated from God spiritually. Believers are separated from God in fellowship.

No. The Bible does not say future sin is paid for.
Thos who have actually read the Bible and understand it know better. Hebrews says that Christ's sacrifice was for sin once for all.
Heb 7:27 - who does not need daily, like those high priests, to offer up sacrifices, first for His own sins and then for the sins of the people, because this He did once for all when He offered upHimself.

Rom 6:10 - For the death that He died, He died to sin once for all; but the life that He lives, He lives to God.

Heb 10:10 - By this will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

1 Pet 3:18 - For Christ also died for sins once for all, the just for the unjust, so that He might bring us to God, having been put to death in the flesh, but made alive in the spirit;

Sorry I couldn't come up with some parable for you, but the Scripture is clear enough for me and many others.

On the contrary, Hebrews 10:26 says if we willfully sin after having received the knowledge of the truth, there remains no more sacrifice for sin.
Correct. Because Christ already died for sins once for all. He is the ultimate and final sacrifice. The verse is a repeat of v.18 - Now where there is forgiveness of these things, there is no longer any offering for sin.

Consider this: if Christ didn't die for all sins, past, present and future, then we have to ultimately save ourselves since He didn't complete the work of providing salvation.

1 John 1:9 says we have to confess sin in order to be forgiven of sin.
What is the theme of ch 1? Fellowship, not relationship. The chapter is to believers, who are already saved.

1 John 1:7 says we have to walk in the light as he is in the light in order for the blood of Jesus to cleanse us from all sin.
Which is accomplished through confession for fellowship.

Proverbs 28:13 says we have to confess and forsake sin in order to have mercy. So no. You are wrong.
You have failed to prove how this verse supports your theory.

You are the one who is failing to see what the Scriptures are plainly saying. If what you say is true, then the Pharisees should have been saved. But Jesus said they were hypocrites and they lived a hypocrital and sinful life.
You are so confused. Of course they weren't saved. They thought they could earn eternal life by keeping the law. Which they couldn't.

And you do not understand what Romans 6 says. Paul clearly says shall we continue in sin so that grace may abound? Paul's answer to that question is "God forbid."
I agree. And this verse still does not support your theory.

He then says yield yourselves to whom ye obey.
The more we yield to the Spirit, the LESS we sin.

No. I have proved it very clearly by God's Word. You are simply not wanting to see what the Scriptures plainly say. 1 Peter 4:1, Galatians 5:24, and many others refute your belief. Jesus said to two people to: "sin no more."
I've refuted those verses. They don't occur in the original manuscripts.

So Jesus's parables and other analogies are a deception?
What a ridiculous question. Seriously? Jesus NEVER suggested His disciples speak in parables. Neither did Paul.

I have been talking against Calvinism and OSAS for many years now. Yes, you do not believe in Calvinism, but that is where OSAS comes from.
Wrong. It comes from the Bible. As been proven and you've rejected.

But if a believer makes excuses for sin by saying they will forever sin, then they are believing in a sin and still be saved doctrine (Which is wrong).
Who on this thread ever said they "will sin forever"? No one. So stop making claims that no one says. I've been clear about ceasing sin when we obtain a resurrection body. And there will be no sin in heaven.

You yourself said it is impossible for a beleiver to stop sinning.
Again, you keep trying to paint a very false picture that believers constantly sin. Stop it. It's impossible for believers to achieve sinless perfection.

So this gives the believer the green light to sin on occasion.
Don't be ridiculous. No one has a green light, nor a license. We do have sin natures, that do sin.

Yes, you believe a believer should strive to live holy and to repent of sin, etc. But that doesn't mean anything if one thinks they will just forever sin in this life. It's making an allowance for evil. It is having the wrong attitude towards sin.
You've got the wrong attitude about a lot of doctrine.

Which is teaching man to sin.
When did man need to be taught to sin?? That is laughable.
 
Upvote 0

FreeGrace2

Senior Veteran
Nov 15, 2012
20,401
1,730
USA
✟184,847.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Suffice it to say that I disagree with you on what several verses that you often use teach. Let' not go through them again here. We've already done it a dozen time or so before this.
Well, yeah, some people view 13 as unlucky.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.