Where did I ever say that we would sin in heaven or deny that our body of sin will be removed?
How about out of your own mouth? From my post #2369, in which I quoted directly your post:
"Nowhere does the Bible say we stop sinning when we get to Heaven."
What else could you have meant by that?
The point I was making is that you are believing that a believer will not stop sinning until they die and go to Heaven. But the Scriptures teach that we can stop sinning now in this life (1 Peter 4:1) (Galatians 5:24) (Romans 6:14) (
Psalm 119:11) (Matthew 5:48) (John 5:14) (John 8:11) (Hebrews 12:14).
None of them teach anything close to that, unless you want to argue that Paul was off his rocker when he wrote Romans 7 and Eph 5.
Nowhere did I specifically mention you. I am merely attacking the belief and speaking generally of those who hold to this view. Granted, I realize that you do hold to this belief, but I am striving to not drag you or your personal life into it. This forum is not a facebook discussion; We are here to discuss God's Word. Anyways, I believe I have presented Scriptures that makes it all too clear that we can stop sinning in this life. Your not wanting to acknowledge such a truth does not change it in God's Word, my friend. But I do believe that people do not believe or do things without a reason or motivation behind it. I believe that if a person does sin or some kind of evil (Whether it be a lot of sin or a little bit of sin), they are doing so for a reason. This is why I believe many in the OSAS camp have gotten upset with me and have called me some pretty bad stuff over the years.
The ONLY reason anyone would call you "some pretty bad stuff" is because of the extremely unbiblical things you say.
In the bulk of Romans 7, Paul is talking from his perspective as a Jew before he became a Christian.
This is pure fantasy. Paul used the present tense throughout the chapter. But ignore if if you want.
In Romans 7:1, Paul says he speaks to those who know the Law. Meaning, he is speaking from a perspective of being under the Law from his old life.
That's just more fantasy. He is addressing the Jews in the congregation. That's all.
How so? Well, in Romans 7:14, Paul says he is sold under sin. Yet, in Romans 8:2, Paul says he is free from sin. So unless Paul has a split personality, he is clearly speaking from two different perspectives here. For Paul speaks in at least one other place in Scripture from another perspective (See Galatians 2:18).
cherry picking verses out of the air don't help you. Just reading ch 7 shows clearly that Paul's struggle between his 2 natures is continuing. The present tense completely defeats your claims.
Also, I believe I am defending the truth of the Scriptures, too; However, we both cannot be right, though.
Of course no one would try to defend what they bon't believe. Duh. And you're right; we both cannot be right. And I've consistently and repeatedly shown how your view is the wrong one.
Now, you are saying that you are to avoid sin and to confess sin when it happens.
Now?? I've ALWAYS said that.
But one cannot really avoid sin because in your belief they will always be dragged back into sin like a magnet sticking to a piece of metal.
Did I say any of that nonsense? No. So stop putting stupid words in the mouths of others. The Bible tells us that our sin nature WILL struggle with our new nature. Do you deny that truth?
There is no real avoidance of sin in your view.
You seem to be totally clueless as to my view. So stop trying to describe or define it.
In your belief, sin has dominion over you.
This is just idiotic. When functioning under the new nature and the filling of the Holy Spirit, sin does NOT have any dominion over the believer.
But, when the believer grieves (Eph 5:18) or quenches (1 Thess 5:19) the Holy Spirit, then sin DOES.
But this is all part of the doctrine of spiritual growth, which you seem totally unaware of.
But Paul says, in Romans 6:14, that sin shall not have dominion over you.
And it doesn't when the believer continues to confess their sins and lives from the new nature, not the old one.
Please take note that in Romans 6, one of the points Paul is making is for us not to continue in sin while under grace.
That is true and has nothing to do with sinless perfection.
Look, you've already admitted that you're only hoping for that state and haven't arrived yet. Duh. Since your admission, do you consider yourself saved yet?
What advantage does the devil have if a believer actually attains in living a holy life? I do not see how that helps him.
None. Of course it doesn't help him. Which is why he prowls around like a roaring lion, seeking someone to devour. 1 Pet 5:8
On the contrary, the Scriptures say, "be ye angry and sin not..." (Ephesians 4:26), "Neither give place to the devil" (Ephesians 4:27).
Yep. These are commands. And no one keeps all the commands perfectly or consistently, even yourself. As you've already admitted.
So you admit that you believe in a "sin and still be saved" doctrine on some level?
Because the Bible teaches that sinners are saved when they believe in Christ. And we're all sinners, including yourself. As you've already admitted.
Do you believe that you can die in urepentant sin and still be saved?
Yes, because eternal life is a gift of God (Rom 6:23) and God's gifts are irrevocable (Rom 11:29).
Further, believers are sealed with the Holy Spirit, which is a promise and guarantee from God to His own possession (believers) for the day of redemption. Eph 1:13,14,4:30, 2 Cor 1:22, 5:5.
I do hope you've at least read each of these verses. They couldn't be more clear.
Do you believe all future sin is paid for?
The Bible teaches that. But, do you believe what the Bible teaches? The book of Hebrews covers that in detail in ch 8-10.
How does that not lead one to think the wrong thing about salvation whereby they will live a life of sin without impunity?
Since no legitimate Bible teacher ever teaches such trash, why would anyone even come to that nonsense conclusion?
The Bible is full of dire warnings and consequences for sin. None of which include loss of salvation.
Your entire premise is false.
I believe I have an assurance of my salvation now (Which is based upon various verses in Scripture).
Based on what, exactly? Your hope to reach sinlessness? So why did Christ die for your sins?
But I also realize that I must continue in the faith, though.
Not to continue to be saved, but to be blessed and rewarded.
Again, even one sin is enough to cause tremendous problems even spiritually. For it only took one sin to separate God from man in the Garden.
We are not to be compared to Adam and his sin. But sin does separate us from God's fellowship, which is the point of 1 Jn 1. Though I don't expect you to understand that, since you haven't understood just how much 1 Jn 1:8 totally refutes your views.
No. See, you think it is okay in God's eyes to let a believer get away with a little bit of evil as long as they confess it.
Where did I say "get away with" anything? Again, stop putting stupid words in my mouth.
Do you understand grace? I've asked this before but I don't remember you ever explaining what you think grace is or means, or how it applies to the believer.
My understanding of your view is that you have to earn God's favor by becoming sinless.
I have already explained to you what 1 John 1:8 is actually saying.
Your so-called explanation doesn't come close to the actual words at all. They refute you.
Paul is not declaring he is a sinner in the present tense. Again, as I said before, see verse 13 (1 Timothy 1:13).
Nonsense. 1 Tim 1:15 is in the present tense.
It is a trustworthy statement, deserving full acceptance, that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners, among whom I
AM foremost of all.
If your view were correct, Paul would have said "I WAS foremost of all". But he used the PRESENT TENSE.
Paul says BEFORE he was a blasphemer, etc. (As a part of his old life).
Uh, yeah, before he believed. But v.15 totally destroys all your views.