• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
Status
Not open for further replies.

busterdog

Senior Veteran
Jun 20, 2006
3,359
183
Visit site
✟26,929.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm sitting here, trying to bite down the smarmy comment, but I just can't. Please take this in the best possible way. The question is:

"Why would God lie to us about this?"

No problem.

I am not seeing a consistent hermeneutic from the get go. No one can make the case that Eden is identical to the New Jerusalem or whatever happens after death is gone. But, there are certain elements that would appear to be continue, and they have to do with the presence of the creator and the life He gives. The essential issue is death, which is absent where He is present and where He rules. Any number of references suggest the same.

All I was trying to suggest is that the expansive use of "the former things passing away" just seemed to violate too many rules for construction. Former could mean "first in time" or "first in rank", and does not mean "all of the former things" but certain "former things".
 
Upvote 0

busterdog

Senior Veteran
Jun 20, 2006
3,359
183
Visit site
✟26,929.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
 
Upvote 0

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,723
6,254
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,132,742.00
Faith
Atheist
Why is that necessarily so?
I am not suggesting that they were idiots.

Newton is said to have said that he got to where he was scientifically because "I have stood on the shoulders of giants."

Bronze-age shepherds had fewer giants preceding them.

The Bible doesn't speak to germ theory, however.
Arguably, it doesn't speak to cosmology either. The stories of Genesis do, however -- whatever else they do -- speak to relationship. That is, Man's relationship to God.

That's what the Word is to me.
I don't quite get what you are referring to.
Of course, it also requires "Spirit" to be read, as I noted below to Assyrian regarding the passages from Corinthians. I can only infer that the intervention happened, since at least some of the Word has been received.
Sure, God speaks to us. He speaks to us through creation. He speaks to us through our Church. He speaks to us through our friends. And, of course, he speaks to us thru scripture. (No implied order of importance.)

If I were God, I would deal with that problem with a Bible like the one we have. Of course, Iam more filter than I am God.
I don't know what I would do if I were God. I just know I ain't him. But, I very much agree with your last sentence.

I agree with this to a degree. But your last phrase is where TEs disagree with you. The vast majority of biologists believe evolution -- as I believe our resident experts have pointed. (I'm more interested in the philosophy of knowing -- I'll leave the details to others.) I'd bet that the percentage of astronomers and physicists that don't believe that the evidence tells them that some stars are ~13 billion light-years away is so vanishingly small as to be zero.

We certainly don't know everything -- maybe not even much. But each generation, we acquire more giants.

The fact that we don't know everything shouldn't preclude us from believing that we can know some things beyond reasonable doubt.

God bless.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.