Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That quote is more fitting for Ironhold, actually. He is the one constantly bringing it up in numerous threads and trying to characterize it as "mainstream Christianity". It's his personal vendetta, not mine. And, I will repeat, NOT a relevant topic for this particular sub-forum.Based on the content of this post I'd say Ironhold really hit a nerve. The words of Shakespeare come to mind, Methinks thou doth protest too much.
![]()
I believe in free speech and have not and will not report posts. That's for the mods to decide. Oddly enough, when you quote my post in your response, you create an association between my post and your comment. Hence, my approval comment. Don't like it? Don't quote me.And oddly enough I didn't make any claim about your relationship with my approval. People post their opinions and observations all the time. That includes you. I'm not aware of any good reason why I should be excluded from participating in this forum in the same manner as everyone else.
If you think my comment is a flame--report it.
![]()
Would it?
So you didn't understand that it is not ours to avenge?
I believe in free speech and have not and will not report posts.
Oddly enough, when you quote my post in your response, you create an association between my post and your comment. Hence, my approval comment. Don't like it? Don't quote me.
Don't ever desire to put yourself in the situation where you would have toI didn't say anything about avenging. You posted a twisted question. If I saw someone being hurt I would help them. I wouldn't wait until it was over and then avenge them. How I helped them would depend on the situation.
![]()
http://www.fmh-child.org/Lisa.html
I originally posted this elsewhere, but only one person dared address it.
The above tract was first published in 1984 by Chick Publications, a company that has spent the last 40+ decades publishing material aimed at converting people towards a form of Evangelical Protestantism; most of the material is produced, in whole or in part, by Jack Chick, the founder of the organization.
In the tract, a doctor discovers that the titular character, a young girl, is somehow suffering from a persistent STD and shows other signs of having been sexually assaulted. When the doctor confronts the girl's father about this, the father confesses. In response to this discovery, the doctor informs...
...the dad that he needs to get right with God.
Legal obligations to report abuse? What legal obligations to report abuse? No, once the dad says some choice words in front of the doctor, the doctor lets the dad go home to his family. The dad confesses all, and then says that he's already asked God for forgiveness. In response, the wife and child pray to God for forgiveness for ever being angry with him.
The end.
The company was ultimately forced to chuck things down the hole 1984-style... because the tract was a liability. Neither Chick himself nor the company have, to my knowledge, ever backed down from the message presented in it. Instead, they have simply chosen to deny that it ever existed. Problem is, they published so many copies of this before yanking it that enough copies survived to the dawn of the internet age, at which point they were promptly digitized at web sites like the one above.
So...
As someone who belongs to a mainline Christian denomination, how does it feel knowing that a tract like this was published in God's name?
Don't worry about it. The time will come when one will have to act and those who have grown up into the head will know what to doSounds like apathy to me.
![]()
a man rapes a virgin and then wants to marry her.
What is the simple solution?
mainline Christianity.
Doesn't fit here because Fundamentalism and Evangelicalism are in contrast to Mainline Protestantism.
Jack Chick and his comics do not represent Mainline Protestantism.
-CryptoLutheran
CryptoThrow his butt in jail and let him rot, and give the woman therapy, support, and time to heal from such a tragic event.
-CryptoLutheran
Did you think my response was to you personally?My comment was about not telling me what to do. Are you not able to participate without telling others what they should do?
![]()